Distinct differences in analytical performance of two commercially available assays for specific IgE to egg white and house dust mite allergens.

Komei Ito, Kazunori Tagami
{"title":"Distinct differences in analytical performance of two commercially available assays for specific IgE to egg white and house dust mite allergens.","authors":"Komei Ito,&nbsp;Kazunori Tagami","doi":"10.1186/s12948-021-00151-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measurements of allergen-specific IgE antibodies with different manufacturers' assays show modest or poor agreement. This study compares analytical performance of specific IgE tests for whole allergen extracts and individual allergen components of two assay systems, IMMULITE and ImmunoCAP, using human sera as well as monoclonal antibodies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comparisons were performed for specific IgE to house dust mite (HDM, n = 44), egg white (EW, n = 36) and the allergen components rDer p 1, rDer p 2, nGal d 1, nGal d 2 and nGal d 4 in human sera and with monoclonal mouse/human chimeric IgE antibodies specific for the same allergen components. Competitive interference with IgE measurement was investigated using allergen-specific monoclonal IgG and IgG4 antibodies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measurements of IgE to HDM and EW in serial dilutions of human sera revealed weaker dilution linearity with IMMULITE than with ImmunoCAP. Analysis of five different monoclonal IgE antibodies with total and specific IgE assays, expected to return similar levels, gave an average specific/total IgE ratio of 0.96 (range 0.71-1.14) with ImmunoCAP and 1.89 (range 0.76-2.85) with IMMULITE, indicating overestimation of specific IgE by IMMULITE. With the EW IgE tests of both assay systems, measurements of a chimeric anti-Gal d 2 IgE antibody were unaffected by a competing mouse IgG antibody. While the same was true for measurement of a chimeric anti-Der p 1 IgE antibody using the HDM test in ImmunoCAP, a suppression of measured concentrations by up to 42% was observed in IMMULITE. Similarly, measurement of HDM-specific IgE in human sera by ImmunoCAP was unaffected by a competing monoclonal anti-Der p 2 IgG4 antibody while IMMULITE displayed a reduction of HDM-specific IgE values by up to 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this evaluation of analytical performance of two widely used assay systems, ImmunoCAP showed higher accuracy in quantitation of specific IgE and greater resistance against competing allergen-specific non-IgE antibodies which may arise through natural or dietary exposure, or as a result of allergen immunotherapy treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":38753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Molecular Allergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330041/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Molecular Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12948-021-00151-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Measurements of allergen-specific IgE antibodies with different manufacturers' assays show modest or poor agreement. This study compares analytical performance of specific IgE tests for whole allergen extracts and individual allergen components of two assay systems, IMMULITE and ImmunoCAP, using human sera as well as monoclonal antibodies.

Methods: Comparisons were performed for specific IgE to house dust mite (HDM, n = 44), egg white (EW, n = 36) and the allergen components rDer p 1, rDer p 2, nGal d 1, nGal d 2 and nGal d 4 in human sera and with monoclonal mouse/human chimeric IgE antibodies specific for the same allergen components. Competitive interference with IgE measurement was investigated using allergen-specific monoclonal IgG and IgG4 antibodies.

Results: Measurements of IgE to HDM and EW in serial dilutions of human sera revealed weaker dilution linearity with IMMULITE than with ImmunoCAP. Analysis of five different monoclonal IgE antibodies with total and specific IgE assays, expected to return similar levels, gave an average specific/total IgE ratio of 0.96 (range 0.71-1.14) with ImmunoCAP and 1.89 (range 0.76-2.85) with IMMULITE, indicating overestimation of specific IgE by IMMULITE. With the EW IgE tests of both assay systems, measurements of a chimeric anti-Gal d 2 IgE antibody were unaffected by a competing mouse IgG antibody. While the same was true for measurement of a chimeric anti-Der p 1 IgE antibody using the HDM test in ImmunoCAP, a suppression of measured concentrations by up to 42% was observed in IMMULITE. Similarly, measurement of HDM-specific IgE in human sera by ImmunoCAP was unaffected by a competing monoclonal anti-Der p 2 IgG4 antibody while IMMULITE displayed a reduction of HDM-specific IgE values by up to 30%.

Conclusions: In this evaluation of analytical performance of two widely used assay systems, ImmunoCAP showed higher accuracy in quantitation of specific IgE and greater resistance against competing allergen-specific non-IgE antibodies which may arise through natural or dietary exposure, or as a result of allergen immunotherapy treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种市售方法对蛋清和尘螨过敏原特异性IgE的分析性能有明显差异。
背景:不同厂家测定过敏原特异性IgE抗体的结果一致性一般或较差。本研究比较了两种检测系统(IMMULITE和ImmunoCAP)使用人血清和单克隆抗体对整个过敏原提取物和单个过敏原成分进行特异性IgE检测的分析性能。方法:比较人血清中尘螨(HDM, n = 44)、蛋清(EW, n = 36)及过敏原成分rDer p1、rDer p2、nGal d1、nGal d2、nGal d1、nGal d1、nGal d1、nGal d1、nGal d1和nGal d1的特异性IgE,并与对同一过敏原成分特异性的小鼠/人嵌合IgE单克隆抗体进行比较。采用过敏原特异性单克隆IgG和IgG4抗体研究对IgE测量的竞争干扰。结果:对人血清中HDM和EW的IgE进行系列稀释的结果显示,与ImmunoCAP相比,IMMULITE的稀释线性较弱。对五种不同的单克隆IgE抗体进行总IgE和特异性IgE分析,预计会得到相似的水平,免疫cap的平均特异性/总IgE比为0.96(范围为0.71-1.14),而IMMULITE的平均特异性/总IgE比为1.89(范围为0.76-2.85),表明IMMULITE对特异性IgE的估计过高。在两种检测系统的EW IgE测试中,嵌合抗gal d2 IgE抗体的测量不受竞争小鼠IgG抗体的影响。虽然在ImmunoCAP中使用HDM测试测量嵌合抗der p1 IgE抗体也是如此,但在IMMULITE中观察到测量浓度的抑制高达42%。同样,用ImmunoCAP测定人血清中hdm特异性IgE不受竞争单克隆抗der p2 IgG4抗体的影响,而IMMULITE显示hdm特异性IgE值降低高达30%。结论:在对两种广泛使用的分析系统的分析性能的评估中,免疫cap在定量特异性IgE方面显示出更高的准确性,并且对可能通过自然或饮食暴露或过敏原免疫治疗产生的竞争性过敏原特异性非IgE抗体有更大的抵抗力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Molecular Allergy
Clinical and Molecular Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Molecular Allergy is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that publishes research on human allergic and immunodeficient disease (immune deficiency not related to HIV infection/AIDS). The scope of the journal encompasses all aspects of the clinical, genetic, molecular and inflammatory aspects of allergic-respiratory (Type 1 hypersensitivity) and non-AIDS immunodeficiency disorders. However, studies of allergic/hypersensitive aspects of HIV infection/AIDS or drug desensitization protocols in AIDS are acceptable. At the basic science level, this includes original work and reviews on the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying the inflammatory response.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: SIRM‑SIAAIC consensus, an Italian document on management of patients at risk of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media. Breast feeding, obesity, and asthma association: clinical and molecular views. Serum interleukin-6 level and its association with pulmonary involvement in progressive systemic sclerosis; a case-control study. Identification of allergens in Artocarpus heterophyllus, Moringa oleifera, Trianthema portulacastrum and Syzygium samarangense. Systemic inflammatory proteins in offspring following maternal probiotic supplementation for atopic dermatitis prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1