Provision of Government-funded and Pro Bono Dental Care: Are There Gender Differences?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the Canadian Dental Association Pub Date : 2021-01-01
Kenneth Mui, Marco Caminiti, Howard Tenenbaum, Carlos Quiñonez
{"title":"Provision of Government-funded and Pro Bono Dental Care: Are There Gender Differences?","authors":"Kenneth Mui,&nbsp;Marco Caminiti,&nbsp;Howard Tenenbaum,&nbsp;Carlos Quiñonez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Government-funded and pro bono dental care are important to populations with limited means. At the same time, dentistry is experiencing a gender shift in the practising profession. As a result, we aimed to determine the factors associated with the provision of government-funded and pro bono dental care and whether there are gender differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary data analysis of the results of a 2012 survey of a representative sample of Ontario dentists. Descriptive, bivariate and multivariable analyses were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 867 survey respondents represented a 28.9% response rate. On average, Ontario dentists reported that 15.7% of their practice consisted of government-funded patients and they provided $2242 worth of pro bono care monthly. Male and female dentists reported similar levels of both (p > 0.05). Being a practice owner and having more pediatric patients influenced levels of government-funded patients. Being internationally trained, of European ethnicity, single, and income status affected levels of monthly pro bono care. Gender-stratified analysis revealed that, among female dentists, household responsibilities was a unique factor associated with the proportion of government-funded patients, as was international training, personal income and ethnic origin for levels of pro bono care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, male and female dentists are similar in the provision of government-funded and pro bono care, but various factors influence levels of each in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":50005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Dental Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Government-funded and pro bono dental care are important to populations with limited means. At the same time, dentistry is experiencing a gender shift in the practising profession. As a result, we aimed to determine the factors associated with the provision of government-funded and pro bono dental care and whether there are gender differences.

Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of the results of a 2012 survey of a representative sample of Ontario dentists. Descriptive, bivariate and multivariable analyses were carried out.

Results: The 867 survey respondents represented a 28.9% response rate. On average, Ontario dentists reported that 15.7% of their practice consisted of government-funded patients and they provided $2242 worth of pro bono care monthly. Male and female dentists reported similar levels of both (p > 0.05). Being a practice owner and having more pediatric patients influenced levels of government-funded patients. Being internationally trained, of European ethnicity, single, and income status affected levels of monthly pro bono care. Gender-stratified analysis revealed that, among female dentists, household responsibilities was a unique factor associated with the proportion of government-funded patients, as was international training, personal income and ethnic origin for levels of pro bono care.

Conclusion: Overall, male and female dentists are similar in the provision of government-funded and pro bono care, but various factors influence levels of each in both groups.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提供政府资助和无偿牙科护理:是否存在性别差异?
背景:政府资助和无偿的牙科护理对经济条件有限的人群很重要。与此同时,牙科正在经历执业职业的性别转变。因此,我们的目的是确定与提供政府资助和无偿牙科护理有关的因素,以及是否存在性别差异。方法:我们对2012年安大略省牙医代表性样本的调查结果进行了二次数据分析。进行了描述性、双变量和多变量分析。结果:867名调查对象的回复率为28.9%。平均而言,安大略省的牙医报告说,他们15.7%的执业是由政府资助的病人组成的,他们每月提供价值2242美元的无偿护理。男性和女性牙医报告的水平相似(p > 0.05)。作为一家诊所的所有者,拥有更多的儿科患者会影响政府资助患者的水平。接受过国际培训、欧洲种族、单身和收入状况会影响每月无偿护理的水平。性别分层分析显示,在女牙医中,家庭责任是与政府资助患者比例相关的一个独特因素,国际培训、个人收入和种族出身也是公益护理水平的一个独特因素。结论:总体而言,男性和女性牙医在提供政府资助和无偿护理方面相似,但各种因素影响了两组中各自的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Canadian Dental Association
Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JCDA.ca (Journal of the Canadian Dental Association) is the flagship scholarly, peer-reviewed publication of CDA, providing dialogue between the national association and the dental community. It is dedicated to publishing worthy scientific and clinical articles and informing dentists of issues significant to the profession. CDA has focused its recent efforts on knowledge, advocacy and practice support initiatives and JCDA.ca is an essential part of CDA''s knowledge strategy.
期刊最新文献
Osteomyelitis of the Jaw: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis at a Tertiary Health Care Centre in Canada. Infective Endocarditis: Etiology, Epidemiology and Current Recommendations for the Dental Practitioner. Long-Term Trends in Access to Dental Care in Canada. Persistent Toothache Despite Multiple Dental-related Treatments: How Could this Be? Impact of Delayed Dental Treatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic in an Undergraduate Dental Clinic in Southwestern Ontario, Canada - A Retrospective Chart Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1