The safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2021-07-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986211027096
Li-Ting Wang, Wei-Ting Lin, Chih-Cheng Lai, Ya-Hui Wang, Cheng-Hsin Chen, Yen-Teh Chang, Chao-Hsien Chen, Cheng-Yi Wang
{"title":"The safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections: a systemic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Li-Ting Wang,&nbsp;Wei-Ting Lin,&nbsp;Chih-Cheng Lai,&nbsp;Ya-Hui Wang,&nbsp;Cheng-Hsin Chen,&nbsp;Yen-Teh Chang,&nbsp;Chao-Hsien Chen,&nbsp;Cheng-Yi Wang","doi":"10.1177/20420986211027096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from their inception until May 2020 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only RCTs evaluating the risk of adverse events (AEs) for ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparative treatments for acute bacterial infections in adult patients were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, four RCTs including a total of 2924 patients (1475 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 1449 in the control group) were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of treatment-emergent AEs was 51.3% (748/1458) in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group, which was comparable to the control group, 49.9% [714/1430; odd's ratio (OR), 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91-1.25; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%]. In addition, no difference was observed between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and control groups in terms of the risk of serious AEs (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.93-1.61; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 15.5%) and the risk of discontinuing the study drug due to AEs (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55-1.33; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%). The rate of all-cause mortality did not significantly differ between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and control groups (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82-1.50; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%). The only exception was the risk of <i>Clostridiodes difficile</i> (<i>C. difficile</i>) colitis, where ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with the control group [0.72% (10/1376) <i>versus</i> 0.14% (2/1391), OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.23-11.97; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment is as tolerable as comparative treatment options for acute bacterial infections in adult patients, however it has an increased risk of <i>C. difficile</i> infection. As a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam could be a safe therapeutic option for use in common clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong><b>The safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam (an antibiotics) for the treatment of acute bacterial infections</b> <b>Objective(s):</b> Ceftolozane-tazobactam is an effective antibiotic for the treatment of acute bacterial infections. This study conducts a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety (side effects) of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients compared with other drugs. <b>Methods:</b> We extracted data from four randomized controlled trials, including a total of 2924 patients (1475 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 1449 in the control group). <b>Results:</b> The rate of treatment related adverse events (AEs) was similar in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group (51.3%) and control group (49.9%). There was also no difference in risk of serious adverse events, the risk of discontinuing the study drug due to AEs, and all-cause mortality. The only exception was the risk of <i>Clostridiodes difficile</i> colitis (a cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea), where ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with the control group. <b>Conclusion:</b> In conclusion, as a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam could be a safe therapeutic option for use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"12 ","pages":"20420986211027096"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20420986211027096","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986211027096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from their inception until May 2020 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only RCTs evaluating the risk of adverse events (AEs) for ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparative treatments for acute bacterial infections in adult patients were included.

Results: Overall, four RCTs including a total of 2924 patients (1475 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 1449 in the control group) were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of treatment-emergent AEs was 51.3% (748/1458) in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group, which was comparable to the control group, 49.9% [714/1430; odd's ratio (OR), 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91-1.25; I 2 = 0%]. In addition, no difference was observed between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and control groups in terms of the risk of serious AEs (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.93-1.61; I 2 = 15.5%) and the risk of discontinuing the study drug due to AEs (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55-1.33; I 2 = 0%). The rate of all-cause mortality did not significantly differ between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and control groups (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82-1.50; I 2 = 0%). The only exception was the risk of Clostridiodes difficile (C. difficile) colitis, where ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with the control group [0.72% (10/1376) versus 0.14% (2/1391), OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.23-11.97; I 2 = 0%].

Conclusion: Ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment is as tolerable as comparative treatment options for acute bacterial infections in adult patients, however it has an increased risk of C. difficile infection. As a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam could be a safe therapeutic option for use in common clinical practice.

Plain language summary: The safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam (an antibiotics) for the treatment of acute bacterial infections Objective(s): Ceftolozane-tazobactam is an effective antibiotic for the treatment of acute bacterial infections. This study conducts a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety (side effects) of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients compared with other drugs. Methods: We extracted data from four randomized controlled trials, including a total of 2924 patients (1475 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 1449 in the control group). Results: The rate of treatment related adverse events (AEs) was similar in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group (51.3%) and control group (49.9%). There was also no difference in risk of serious adverse events, the risk of discontinuing the study drug due to AEs, and all-cause mortality. The only exception was the risk of Clostridiodes difficile colitis (a cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea), where ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with the control group. Conclusion: In conclusion, as a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam could be a safe therapeutic option for use in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦治疗急性细菌感染的安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
目的:本研究的目的是进行一项荟萃分析,以评估头孢唑氮-他唑巴坦治疗成人急性细菌感染的临床安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库从建立到2020年5月的相关随机对照试验(rct)。仅纳入了评价头孢唑氮-他唑巴坦不良事件(ae)风险和成人急性细菌感染比较治疗的随机对照试验。结果:meta分析共纳入4项rct,共2924例患者(头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦组1475例,对照组1449例)。头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦组治疗后突发不良事件发生率为51.3%(748/1458),与对照组49.9%(714/1430)相当;奇比(OR), 1.06;95%置信区间(CI) 0.91-1.25;i2 = 0%]。此外,在严重不良事件的风险方面,头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦组与对照组之间没有差异(OR, 1.22;95% ci, 0.93-1.61;i2 = 15.5%)和因ae而停止研究药物的风险(OR, 0.85;95% ci, 0.55-1.33;i2 = 0%)。头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦组与对照组的全因死亡率无显著差异(OR, 1.11;95% ci, 0.82-1.50;i2 = 0%)。唯一的例外是艰难梭菌(C. difficile)结肠炎的风险,与对照组相比,头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦治疗的风险明显更高[0.72%(10/1376)对0.14% (2/1391),OR, 3.84;95% ci, 1.23-11.97;i2 = 0%]。结论:头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦治疗成人急性细菌感染的可耐受性与比较治疗方案一样,但它增加了艰难梭菌感染的风险。头孢唑氮-他唑巴坦作为一种新型广谱抗生素,可作为一种安全的治疗选择用于临床实践。摘要:头孢托洛赞-他唑巴坦(抗生素)治疗急性细菌感染的安全性目的:头孢托洛赞-他唑巴坦是治疗急性细菌感染的有效抗生素。本研究通过荟萃分析,比较头孢唑氮-他唑巴坦治疗成人急性细菌感染患者与其他药物的临床安全性(副作用)。方法:从4项随机对照试验中提取资料,共2924例患者(头孢洛赞-他唑巴坦组1475例,对照组1449例)。结果:头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦治疗相关不良事件(ae)发生率与对照组(49.9%)相当,为51.3%。在严重不良事件的风险、因不良事件而停用研究药物的风险和全因死亡率方面也没有差异。唯一的例外是艰难梭菌结肠炎(抗生素相关性腹泻的一种原因)的风险,与对照组相比,头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦治疗的风险明显更高。结论:头孢唑嗪-他唑巴坦作为一种新型广谱抗生素,可作为一种安全的治疗方案应用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the impact of a pharmacist intervention on inappropriate prescribing practices at hospital admission and discharge in older patients: a secondary outcome analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Determining the optimum dose of remifentanil in combination with propofol for total intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy under Narcotrend and SPI monitoring. The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance department in the pharmaceutical industry: results of an Italian national survey. Comparison of a single intravenous infusion of alfentanil or sufentanil combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial. Governance of artificial intelligence and machine learning in pharmacovigilance: what works today and what more is needed?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1