Mental health during the first wave of COVID-19 in Canada, the USA, Brazil and Italy.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-05 DOI:10.1080/13651501.2021.1956544
Jasmine Turna, Beth Patterson, Carolina Goldman Bergmann, Nina Lamberti, Maryam Rahat, Heather Dwyer, Ana Paula Francisco, Matteo Vismara, Bernardo Dell'Osso, Beth Sideris, Michael Van Ameringen
{"title":"Mental health during the first wave of COVID-19 in Canada, the USA, Brazil and Italy.","authors":"Jasmine Turna,&nbsp;Beth Patterson,&nbsp;Carolina Goldman Bergmann,&nbsp;Nina Lamberti,&nbsp;Maryam Rahat,&nbsp;Heather Dwyer,&nbsp;Ana Paula Francisco,&nbsp;Matteo Vismara,&nbsp;Bernardo Dell'Osso,&nbsp;Beth Sideris,&nbsp;Michael Van Ameringen","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2021.1956544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mental health (MH) burden on healthcare practitioners (HCPs) is emerging as a significant cost of the pandemic, although few studies have compared the MH of HCPs in different countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A link to an online survey was posted in the Spring of 2020 which included questions regarding perceived impact of the pandemic; current MH symptom severity and impairment was evaluated using validated scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1315 individuals (74% female, mean age: 42.9 + 16.4) in Canada, the United States, Brazil and Italy completed the survey. Nearly 26% met diagnostic thresholds for GAD and MDD; Italian respondents reported the lowest rates of disorder. Except for Canada, non-HCPs in each country reported higher symptom severity than HCPs. Amongst the HCPs, Canadian HCPs reported the highest rates of anxiety and depression as well as increases in alcohol and cannabis use, lower levels of perceived emotional support and more worry about themselves or their loved ones contracting COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite key infrastructural and COVID-19 mortality differences between the countries, the MH effects appeared to be quite similar. HCPs, with the exception of Canada, reported less impact on their mental health compared to the general population, suggesting resilience in the face of adversity.Key pointsRates of current mental health disorders were similar across Canada, the USA and Brazil but lower in Italy, yet much higher than pre-pandemic ratesNon-Healthcare Practitioners (HCPs) reported significantly higher severity on all MH scales in the overall sample. This was consistent within the USA, Brazil and Italy, however in Canada, HCPs reported higher anxiety, depression and stress symptom severity compared to Canadian non-HCPs.Canadian HCPs reported significantly higher anxiety and depression symptom severity than all other countriesCanadian HCPs also reported significantly greater increases in alcohol and cannabis use, lower levels of perceived emotional support and more worry about themselves or their loved ones contracting COVID-19 compared to HCPs in the other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13651501.2021.1956544","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2021.1956544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The mental health (MH) burden on healthcare practitioners (HCPs) is emerging as a significant cost of the pandemic, although few studies have compared the MH of HCPs in different countries.

Methods: A link to an online survey was posted in the Spring of 2020 which included questions regarding perceived impact of the pandemic; current MH symptom severity and impairment was evaluated using validated scales.

Results: Overall, 1315 individuals (74% female, mean age: 42.9 + 16.4) in Canada, the United States, Brazil and Italy completed the survey. Nearly 26% met diagnostic thresholds for GAD and MDD; Italian respondents reported the lowest rates of disorder. Except for Canada, non-HCPs in each country reported higher symptom severity than HCPs. Amongst the HCPs, Canadian HCPs reported the highest rates of anxiety and depression as well as increases in alcohol and cannabis use, lower levels of perceived emotional support and more worry about themselves or their loved ones contracting COVID-19.

Conclusion: Despite key infrastructural and COVID-19 mortality differences between the countries, the MH effects appeared to be quite similar. HCPs, with the exception of Canada, reported less impact on their mental health compared to the general population, suggesting resilience in the face of adversity.Key pointsRates of current mental health disorders were similar across Canada, the USA and Brazil but lower in Italy, yet much higher than pre-pandemic ratesNon-Healthcare Practitioners (HCPs) reported significantly higher severity on all MH scales in the overall sample. This was consistent within the USA, Brazil and Italy, however in Canada, HCPs reported higher anxiety, depression and stress symptom severity compared to Canadian non-HCPs.Canadian HCPs reported significantly higher anxiety and depression symptom severity than all other countriesCanadian HCPs also reported significantly greater increases in alcohol and cannabis use, lower levels of perceived emotional support and more worry about themselves or their loved ones contracting COVID-19 compared to HCPs in the other countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大、美国、巴西和意大利第一波COVID-19期间的心理健康状况。
背景:卫生保健从业人员(HCPs)的精神卫生负担正在成为大流行的一项重大成本,尽管很少有研究比较不同国家卫生保健从业人员的精神卫生负担。方法:2020年春季发布了一项在线调查的链接,其中包括有关大流行影响的问题;目前的MH症状严重程度和损害评估使用有效的量表。结果:总体而言,来自加拿大、美国、巴西和意大利的1315人(74%为女性,平均年龄:42.9 + 16.4岁)完成了调查。近26%达到了广泛性焦虑症和重度抑郁症的诊断阈值;意大利的受访者报告的混乱率最低。除加拿大外,每个国家的非HCPs报告的症状严重程度都高于HCPs。在hcp中,加拿大hcp报告的焦虑和抑郁率最高,酒精和大麻使用量增加,感知到的情感支持水平较低,更担心自己或亲人感染COVID-19。结论:尽管各国之间存在关键的基础设施和COVID-19死亡率差异,但MH效应似乎非常相似。除加拿大外,据报告,与一般人群相比,HCPs对其心理健康的影响较小,这表明他们在面对逆境时具有弹性。在加拿大、美国和巴西,当前精神健康障碍的比率相似,但在意大利较低,但远高于大流行前的比率。在整个样本中,非医疗从业人员(HCPs)在所有MH量表上报告的严重程度都要高得多。这在美国、巴西和意大利都是一致的,然而在加拿大,与加拿大的非hcp相比,hcp报告的焦虑、抑郁和压力症状严重程度更高。与其他国家的HCPs相比,加拿大HCPs报告的焦虑和抑郁症状严重程度显着高于所有其他国家。与其他国家的HCPs相比,加拿大HCPs还报告了酒精和大麻使用的显着增加,感知到的情感支持水平较低,更担心自己或亲人感染COVID-19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
期刊最新文献
Mirtazapine blood levels and antidepressant response. Exploring real-world prescribing patterns for maintenance treatment in bipolar disorders: a focus on antidepressants and benzodiazepines. Real-world demographic and clinical profiles of patients with treatment-resistant depression initiated on esketamine nasal spray. Real-world outcomes of long-term use of silexan in patients with anxiety disorders: a single-centre experience. Neurobiological and psychological factors to depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1