Going the Distance: Technical Assistance to Community Prevention Coalitions and its impact on Prevention Coalitions Over Time.

IF 0.9 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Consulting Psychology Journal-Practice and Research Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-30 DOI:10.1037/cpb0000180
Sarah M Chilenski, Janet A Welsh, Daniel F Perkins, Lesa Hoffman
{"title":"Going the Distance: Technical Assistance to Community Prevention Coalitions and its impact on Prevention Coalitions Over Time.","authors":"Sarah M Chilenski,&nbsp;Janet A Welsh,&nbsp;Daniel F Perkins,&nbsp;Lesa Hoffman","doi":"10.1037/cpb0000180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prevention Coordinators are the linking agents providing technical assistance between universities and communities in the PROSPER model to support the implementation and sustainability of youth and family programs that have reduced substance abuse in prior research. This study examines the outcomes and trajectory of the frequency of contact of technical assistance (i.e. dosage) with community collaborative prevention coalitions across the three stages of coalition development. After communities were randomized, members of PROSPER coalitions (n=12) provided information about the quality of their operations at five time points across four and one-half years; prevention coordinators reported on the frequency of contact with their community coalitions at 14 intervals across the same period of time. This study only utilizes the intervention communities. Results from correlational models show that levels of dosage relate to the quality of internal coalition processes over time, but that the direction of the relationship changes over time: high frequency of contact early on relates to lower coalition-rated functioning initially. In contrast, early frequency of contact relates to higher levels of coalition functioning at later time points. Furthermore, longitudinal mixed models show that levels of dosage were consistent over time. These results provide empirical support of the importance of a proactive technical assistance model and add further evidence that important distinctions exist among different coalition developmental phases.</p>","PeriodicalId":53219,"journal":{"name":"Consulting Psychology Journal-Practice and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8341402/pdf/nihms-1713273.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consulting Psychology Journal-Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prevention Coordinators are the linking agents providing technical assistance between universities and communities in the PROSPER model to support the implementation and sustainability of youth and family programs that have reduced substance abuse in prior research. This study examines the outcomes and trajectory of the frequency of contact of technical assistance (i.e. dosage) with community collaborative prevention coalitions across the three stages of coalition development. After communities were randomized, members of PROSPER coalitions (n=12) provided information about the quality of their operations at five time points across four and one-half years; prevention coordinators reported on the frequency of contact with their community coalitions at 14 intervals across the same period of time. This study only utilizes the intervention communities. Results from correlational models show that levels of dosage relate to the quality of internal coalition processes over time, but that the direction of the relationship changes over time: high frequency of contact early on relates to lower coalition-rated functioning initially. In contrast, early frequency of contact relates to higher levels of coalition functioning at later time points. Furthermore, longitudinal mixed models show that levels of dosage were consistent over time. These results provide empirical support of the importance of a proactive technical assistance model and add further evidence that important distinctions exist among different coalition developmental phases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坚持到底:对社区预防联盟的技术援助及其长期对预防联盟的影响。
预防协调员是在PROSPER模式中为大学和社区提供技术援助的联系机构,以支持青年和家庭项目的实施和可持续性,这些项目在先前的研究中减少了药物滥用。本研究考察了技术援助(即剂量)与社区合作预防联盟在联盟发展的三个阶段的接触频率的结果和轨迹。在社区被随机化后,PROSPER联盟的成员(n=12)在四年半的五个时间点提供了有关其运营质量的信息;预防协调员在同一时期内以14个间隔报告与其社区联盟的接触频率。本研究仅采用干预社区。相关模型的结果表明,剂量水平随时间的推移与内部联盟过程的质量有关,但这种关系的方向随时间而变化:早期的高接触频率与最初的低联盟评级功能有关。相比之下,早期的接触频率与后期更高水平的联合功能有关。此外,纵向混合模式表明,剂量水平随时间的推移是一致的。这些结果为前瞻性技术援助模式的重要性提供了实证支持,并进一步证明了不同联盟发展阶段之间存在重要差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research serves as a forum for anyone working in the area of consultation. The journal publishes theoretical and conceptual articles, original research, and in-depth reviews with respect to consultation and its practice. The journal also publishes case studies demonstrating the application of innovative consultation methods and strategies on critical or often overlooked issues with unusual features that would be of general interest to other consultants. Special issues have focused on such current topics as organizational change, executive coaching, and the consultant as an expert witness.
期刊最新文献
The empathy factor: An important aspect of success in every coaching session. Informing inclusive management practices for employees with developmental disabilities: A supervisor training needs analysis. Successful employment outcomes for people with disabilities: A proposed conceptual model. Overlooked employees: Understanding the experiences of disability status and remote working in the wake of COVID-19. Double disadvantage: Disability and gender in the context of workplace harassment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1