Informing decision makers seeking to improve vaccination programs: case-study Serbia.

Q2 Medicine Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2021-07-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20016689.2021.1938894
Christophe Sauboin, Jovan Mihajlović, Maarten Jacobus Postma, Regine Geets, Djurdja Antic, Baudouin Standaert
{"title":"Informing decision makers seeking to improve vaccination programs: case-study Serbia.","authors":"Christophe Sauboin,&nbsp;Jovan Mihajlović,&nbsp;Maarten Jacobus Postma,&nbsp;Regine Geets,&nbsp;Djurdja Antic,&nbsp;Baudouin Standaert","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2021.1938894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b>The optimisation of vaccine policies before their implementation is beholden upon public health decision makers, seeking to maximise population health. In this case study in Serbia, the childhood vaccines under consideration included pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV), rotavirus (RV) vaccination and varicella zoster virus (VZV) vaccination. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study is to define the optimal order of introduction of vaccines to minimise deaths, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) lost, or hospitalisation days, under budget and vaccine coverage constraints. <b>Methods:</b> A constrained optimisation model was developed including a static multi-cohort decision-tree model for the three infectious diseases. Budget and vaccine coverage were constrained, and to rank the vaccines, the optimal solution to the linear programming problem was based upon the ratio of the outcome (deaths, QALYs or hospitalisation days) per unit of budget. A probabilistic decision analysis Monte Carlo simulation technique was used to test the robustness of the rankings. <b>Results:</b> PCV was the vaccine ranked first to minimise deaths, VZV vaccination for QALY loss minimisation and RV vaccination for hospitalisation day reduction. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the most robust ranking was that for PCV minimizing deaths. <b>Conclusion:</b> Constrained optimisation modelling, whilst considering all potential interventions currently, provided a comprehensive and rational approach to decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"1938894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20016689.2021.1938894","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2021.1938894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background:The optimisation of vaccine policies before their implementation is beholden upon public health decision makers, seeking to maximise population health. In this case study in Serbia, the childhood vaccines under consideration included pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV), rotavirus (RV) vaccination and varicella zoster virus (VZV) vaccination. Objective: The objective of this study is to define the optimal order of introduction of vaccines to minimise deaths, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) lost, or hospitalisation days, under budget and vaccine coverage constraints. Methods: A constrained optimisation model was developed including a static multi-cohort decision-tree model for the three infectious diseases. Budget and vaccine coverage were constrained, and to rank the vaccines, the optimal solution to the linear programming problem was based upon the ratio of the outcome (deaths, QALYs or hospitalisation days) per unit of budget. A probabilistic decision analysis Monte Carlo simulation technique was used to test the robustness of the rankings. Results: PCV was the vaccine ranked first to minimise deaths, VZV vaccination for QALY loss minimisation and RV vaccination for hospitalisation day reduction. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the most robust ranking was that for PCV minimizing deaths. Conclusion: Constrained optimisation modelling, whilst considering all potential interventions currently, provided a comprehensive and rational approach to decision making.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向寻求改进疫苗接种规划的决策者提供信息:塞尔维亚案例研究。
背景:疫苗政策实施前的优化是公共卫生决策者的责任,旨在最大限度地提高人口健康。在塞尔维亚的这个案例研究中,正在考虑的儿童疫苗包括肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV)、轮状病毒(RV)疫苗和水痘带状疱疹病毒(VZV)疫苗。目的:本研究的目的是确定在预算和疫苗覆盖限制下引入疫苗的最佳顺序,以最大限度地减少死亡、质量调整生命年(QALYs)损失或住院天数。方法:建立三种传染病的约束优化模型,包括静态多队列决策树模型。预算和疫苗覆盖率受到限制,为了对疫苗进行排序,线性规划问题的最佳解决方案是基于每单位预算的结果(死亡、质量寿命或住院天数)的比率。采用概率决策分析蒙特卡洛模拟技术来检验排名的稳健性。结果:PCV疫苗在减少死亡方面排名第一,VZV疫苗在减少质量损失方面排名第一,RV疫苗在减少住院天数方面排名第一。敏感性分析表明,最可靠的排名是PCV最大限度地减少死亡。结论:约束优化模型在考虑当前所有潜在干预措施的同时,为决策提供了全面合理的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Value of Further Investment in R&D Using Mixed Methods: A Case Study of Biosensor-Integrated Arteriovenous Grafts. Managing Pharmaceutical Costs in Health Systems: A Review of Affordability, Accessibility and Sustainability Strategies. Operational Efficiency of Public Hospitals in Greece During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis Using DEA and AHP Models. Gatekeeping or Provider Choice for Sustainable Health Systems? A Literature Review on Their Impact on Efficiency, Access, and Quality of Services. Technology Assessment vs. Technology Appraisal-How to Strengthen the Science/Value Dichotomy with EU HTA?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1