Quantitative Analysis of Multimodal Skeletal SPECT/CT Reconstructions in Diagnosing Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw.

IF 1.2 Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-11 DOI:10.1055/a-1525-7621
Michael Thomas Beck, Gregor Rugel, Julia Reinfelder, Torsten Kuwert, Philipp Ritt, Sebastian Kreissel, Tilo Schlittenbauer
{"title":"Quantitative Analysis of Multimodal Skeletal SPECT/CT Reconstructions in Diagnosing Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw.","authors":"Michael Thomas Beck,&nbsp;Gregor Rugel,&nbsp;Julia Reinfelder,&nbsp;Torsten Kuwert,&nbsp;Philipp Ritt,&nbsp;Sebastian Kreissel,&nbsp;Tilo Schlittenbauer","doi":"10.1055/a-1525-7621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our goal was to assess visual and quantitative aspects of multimodal skeletal SPECT/CT reconstructions (recon) in differentiating necrotic and healthy bone of patients with suspected MRONJ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prior to surgery, 20 patients with suspected MRONJ underwent SPECT/CT of the jaw 3-4 hours after injection of Tc-99m-DPD (622±112.4 MBq). SPECT/CT data were reconstructed using the multimodal xSPECT Bone and xSPECT Quant algorithms as well as the OSEM-algorithm FLASH 3D. For analysis, we divided the jaw into 12 separate regions. Both xSPECT Bone and FLASH 3D datasets were scored on a four-point scale (VIS xSPECT; VIS F3D), based on the intensity of localized tracer uptake. In F3D and xSPECT Quant datasets, local tracer uptake of each region was recorded as semi-quantitative uptake ratio (SQR F3D) or SUVs, respectively. ROC analysis was performed. Postoperative histologic results served as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VIS F3D, VIS xSPECT and SQR F3D did not differ significantly in diagnostic accuracy (VIS xSPECT sensitivity=0.64; specificity=0.89). Of the quantitative parameters, SUVpeak yielded the best interobserver reproducibility. SUVpeak was 9.9±7.1 (95%CI: 7.84-11.95) in MRONJ regions, as opposed 3.6±1.8 (95% CI:3.36-3.88) elsewhere, with a cutpoint of 4.5 (sensitivity=0.83; specificity=0.80). Absolute quantitation significantly surpassed VIS and SQR (p<0.05) in accuracy and interobserver agreement (SUVpeak: κ=0.92; VIS xSPECT: κ=0.61; SQR F3D κ=0.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Absolute quantitation proved significantly more accurate than visual and semi-quantitative assessment in diagnosing MRONJ, with higher interobserver agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":"403-410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1525-7621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Our goal was to assess visual and quantitative aspects of multimodal skeletal SPECT/CT reconstructions (recon) in differentiating necrotic and healthy bone of patients with suspected MRONJ.

Methods: Prior to surgery, 20 patients with suspected MRONJ underwent SPECT/CT of the jaw 3-4 hours after injection of Tc-99m-DPD (622±112.4 MBq). SPECT/CT data were reconstructed using the multimodal xSPECT Bone and xSPECT Quant algorithms as well as the OSEM-algorithm FLASH 3D. For analysis, we divided the jaw into 12 separate regions. Both xSPECT Bone and FLASH 3D datasets were scored on a four-point scale (VIS xSPECT; VIS F3D), based on the intensity of localized tracer uptake. In F3D and xSPECT Quant datasets, local tracer uptake of each region was recorded as semi-quantitative uptake ratio (SQR F3D) or SUVs, respectively. ROC analysis was performed. Postoperative histologic results served as gold standard.

Results: VIS F3D, VIS xSPECT and SQR F3D did not differ significantly in diagnostic accuracy (VIS xSPECT sensitivity=0.64; specificity=0.89). Of the quantitative parameters, SUVpeak yielded the best interobserver reproducibility. SUVpeak was 9.9±7.1 (95%CI: 7.84-11.95) in MRONJ regions, as opposed 3.6±1.8 (95% CI:3.36-3.88) elsewhere, with a cutpoint of 4.5 (sensitivity=0.83; specificity=0.80). Absolute quantitation significantly surpassed VIS and SQR (p<0.05) in accuracy and interobserver agreement (SUVpeak: κ=0.92; VIS xSPECT: κ=0.61; SQR F3D κ=0.66).

Conclusion: Absolute quantitation proved significantly more accurate than visual and semi-quantitative assessment in diagnosing MRONJ, with higher interobserver agreement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模态骨骼SPECT/CT重建诊断颌骨药物相关性骨坏死的定量分析。
目的:我们的目的是评估多模态骨骼SPECT/CT重建(recon)在鉴别疑似MRONJ患者的坏死骨和健康骨方面的视觉和定量方面。方法:术前,20例疑似MRONJ患者在注射Tc-99m-DPD(622±112.4 MBq)后3-4小时行颌骨SPECT/CT检查。使用多模态xSPECT Bone和xSPECT Quant算法以及osem算法FLASH 3D重建SPECT/CT数据。为了分析,我们把颌骨分成了12个不同的区域。xSPECT骨骼和FLASH 3D数据集均按4分制评分(VIS xSPECT;VIS F3D),基于局部示踪剂摄取的强度。在F3D和xSPECT Quant数据集中,每个区域的局部示踪剂摄取分别记录为半定量摄取比(SQR F3D)或suv。进行ROC分析。术后组织学结果作为金标准。结果:VIS F3D、VIS xSPECT和SQR F3D在诊断准确性上无显著差异(VIS xSPECT敏感性=0.64;特异性= 0.89)。在定量参数中,SUVpeak产生了最好的观察者间再现性。MRONJ区域的SUVpeak为9.9±7.1 (95%CI: 7.84-11.95),而其他区域的SUVpeak为3.6±1.8 (95%CI: 3.36-3.88),临界值为4.5(敏感性=0.83;特异性= 0.80)。结论:绝对定量诊断MRONJ的准确性明显高于目测和半定量评估,观察者间一致性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radioactive Gold Isotopes in the Era of Theranostics: Medical Potential of ¹⁹⁸Au and ¹⁹⁹Au Radioisotopes. Radioiodine Therapy Unit as a "No-Care" Ward - A First Experience Report. Myocardial Perfusion SPECT 2024 in Germany: Results of the 10th Survey. Prognostic Significance of CD68+ Macrophages and FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells in Neuroendocrine Tumors. Diagnosis of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis:18F-FDG-PET activity compared to the Echinococcus multilocularis Ulm Ultrasound Classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1