Microbiological Pattern, Antimicrobial Resistance and Prevalence of MDR/XDR Organisms in Patients With Diabetic Foot Infection in an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-12 DOI:10.1177/15347346211038090
Idris Dawaiwala, Snehal Awaghade, Pranjali Kolhatkar, Sunita Pawar, Supriya Barsode
{"title":"Microbiological Pattern, Antimicrobial Resistance and Prevalence of MDR/XDR Organisms in Patients With Diabetic Foot Infection in an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital.","authors":"Idris Dawaiwala, Snehal Awaghade, Pranjali Kolhatkar, Sunita Pawar, Supriya Barsode","doi":"10.1177/15347346211038090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Foot infections are the most prevalent problem in persons with diabetes. The burden of multidrug resistant (MDR) microorganisms in diabetic foot infections (DFIs) is rising day by day. Given that, the present study aims to determine the variety of microorganisms isolated from the diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern. This prospective observational study was conducted for 1 year at Bharati Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India. Clinically infected patients with DFU admitted to the surgery ward were included in this study. The specimen for microbiological studies is obtained from the wound swabs, soft tissue, and bone tissue as a part of routine clinical care. All demographic, clinical data, microbial culture results were collected, and evaluated for each case. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing to different agents was carried out using the VITEK-2<sup>®</sup> machine. A total of 110 microorganisms were isolated from 76 specimens, with an average of 1.4 organisms per lesion. <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (n = 27, 24.5%) and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (n = 17, 15.4%) were the most prevalent Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms isolated, respectively. MDR organisms constituted up to 52 (47.2%), while 6 (5.4%) of the samples were extensively drug resistant (XDR). Methicillin-resistant <i>S aureus</i> (MRSA) accounted for up to 19 (70.3%) of the <i>S aureus</i> isolates, likewise extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing microorganisms constituted 16 (14.5%) of total isolates in this study. Oxacillin and benzyl penicillin exhibited least susceptibility against Gram-positive bacteria, among Gram-negative organisms; cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin were least sensitive. As most of the <i>S aureus</i> isolate in our study was MRSA, empirical antimicrobial therapy may include coverage for MRSA in a patient with risk factors associated with this pathogen. A crucial observation is the presence of XDR strains of <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> in DFIs, which is resistant to almost all the antimicrobials, tested. Appropriate antimicrobial selection may reduce the morbidity and the emergence of MDR organisms in DFIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","volume":" ","pages":"695-703"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346211038090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Foot infections are the most prevalent problem in persons with diabetes. The burden of multidrug resistant (MDR) microorganisms in diabetic foot infections (DFIs) is rising day by day. Given that, the present study aims to determine the variety of microorganisms isolated from the diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern. This prospective observational study was conducted for 1 year at Bharati Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India. Clinically infected patients with DFU admitted to the surgery ward were included in this study. The specimen for microbiological studies is obtained from the wound swabs, soft tissue, and bone tissue as a part of routine clinical care. All demographic, clinical data, microbial culture results were collected, and evaluated for each case. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing to different agents was carried out using the VITEK-2® machine. A total of 110 microorganisms were isolated from 76 specimens, with an average of 1.4 organisms per lesion. Staphylococcus aureus (n = 27, 24.5%) and Escherichia coli (n = 17, 15.4%) were the most prevalent Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms isolated, respectively. MDR organisms constituted up to 52 (47.2%), while 6 (5.4%) of the samples were extensively drug resistant (XDR). Methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) accounted for up to 19 (70.3%) of the S aureus isolates, likewise extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing microorganisms constituted 16 (14.5%) of total isolates in this study. Oxacillin and benzyl penicillin exhibited least susceptibility against Gram-positive bacteria, among Gram-negative organisms; cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin were least sensitive. As most of the S aureus isolate in our study was MRSA, empirical antimicrobial therapy may include coverage for MRSA in a patient with risk factors associated with this pathogen. A crucial observation is the presence of XDR strains of Proteus mirabilis in DFIs, which is resistant to almost all the antimicrobials, tested. Appropriate antimicrobial selection may reduce the morbidity and the emergence of MDR organisms in DFIs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度一家三级医院糖尿病足感染患者的微生物学模式、抗菌素耐药性和MDR/XDR微生物的流行
足部感染是糖尿病患者最常见的问题。糖尿病足感染(DFIs)中多药耐药(MDR)微生物的负担日益增加。鉴于此,本研究旨在确定从糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)中分离的微生物的种类及其抗生素敏感性模式。这项前瞻性观察性研究在印度浦那的Bharati医院和研究中心进行了一年。本研究纳入了外科病房的DFU临床感染患者。微生物研究的标本是从伤口拭子、软组织和骨组织中获得的,作为常规临床护理的一部分。收集所有人口统计学、临床数据、微生物培养结果,并对每个病例进行评估。使用VITEK-2®机器对不同药剂进行抗菌药敏试验。共从76个标本中分离出110种微生物,平均每个病变有1.4种微生物。金黄色葡萄球菌(n = 27.24.5%)和大肠杆菌(n = 17,15.4%)分别是分离出的最流行的革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性生物体。耐多药生物多达52种(47.2%),而6种(5.4%)样本具有广泛耐药性(XDR)。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)占金黄色葡萄菌分离株的19株(70.3%),同样,产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的微生物占本研究总分离株的16株(14.5%)。在革兰氏阴性菌中,奥西林和苄青霉素对革兰氏阳性菌的易感性最低;头孢呋辛、头孢曲松和环丙沙星的敏感性最低。由于我们研究中的大多数金黄色葡萄球菌分离物都是MRSA,经验抗菌治疗可能包括在有与该病原体相关风险因素的患者中覆盖MRSA。一个关键的观察结果是在DFI中存在奇异变形杆菌的XDR菌株,该菌株对几乎所有测试的抗菌药物都具有耐药性。适当的抗菌药物选择可以减少DFI中MDR生物的发病率和出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (IJLEW) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reviews of evidence-based diagnostic techniques and methods, disease and patient management, and surgical and medical therapeutics for lower extremity wounds such as burns, stomas, ulcers, fistulas, and traumatic wounds. IJLEW also offers evaluations of assessment and monitoring tools, dressings, gels, cleansers, pressure management, footwear/orthotics, casting, and bioengineered skin. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Identification of High-Risk Lower Extremity Wounds Using Point-of-Care Test for Bacterial Protease Activity; A Single-Centre, Single-Blinded, Prospective Study Retracted: "The Leg Subcutaneous Tissue Calcification and Venous Ulcer-a Case Series". Sticking to What Matters: A Matched Comparative Study of Fibrin Glue and Mechanical Fixation for Split-Thickness Skin Grafts in the Lower Extremity. Cases of Lower Extremity and Perianal Burns at the Burn Center in the Southeast Anatolia of Turkey. Superficial Tissue Swabs Versus Deep Tissue Samples in the Detection of Microbiological Profile of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1