A Multi-Facility, Randomized, Comparative Study Examining the Efficacy of Biliary Reconstruction Under a Surgical Microscope in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

IF 1.1 Q3 SURGERY International Journal of Surgery Protocols Pub Date : 2021-07-28 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.29337/ijsp.151
Akihiko Soyama, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Mitsuhisa Takatsuki, Noboru Harada, Takeo Toshima, Shinichiro Ono, Takanobu Hara, Hajime Matsushima, Takayuki Tanaka, Hajime Imamura, Tomohiko Adachi, Masaaki Hidaka, Susumu Eguchi
{"title":"A Multi-Facility, Randomized, Comparative Study Examining the Efficacy of Biliary Reconstruction Under a Surgical Microscope in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.","authors":"Akihiko Soyama,&nbsp;Tomoharu Yoshizumi,&nbsp;Mitsuhisa Takatsuki,&nbsp;Noboru Harada,&nbsp;Takeo Toshima,&nbsp;Shinichiro Ono,&nbsp;Takanobu Hara,&nbsp;Hajime Matsushima,&nbsp;Takayuki Tanaka,&nbsp;Hajime Imamura,&nbsp;Tomohiko Adachi,&nbsp;Masaaki Hidaka,&nbsp;Susumu Eguchi","doi":"10.29337/ijsp.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative biliary complications in living donor liver transplantation are often difficult to treat, and if treatment is not successful, the patient's QOL is significantly reduced. The frequency of postoperative biliary complications is reported to be higher than that of deceased donor transplantation. In 2013, Lin et al. reported that while biliary reconstruction has traditionally used a surgical surgical loupe (2.5x-4.5x), biliary reconstruction using a surgical microscope (5x-15x) can reduce the incidence of complications. The objective of this study is to clarify the efficacy of biliary reconstruction using surgical microscope in living donor liver transplantation by a multi-facility, randomized comparative study.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>It is an open-label randomized controlled study in which target patients who meet the registration requirements are randomly allocated to a surgical loupe group and a microscopy group after obtaining their consent (Ratio 1:1). The primary endpoint is an incidence of biliary complications (bile leakage and anastomotic biliary stricture) with Clavien-Dindo class III or higher within 52 weeks following surgery. The secondary endpoint is length of time required for biliary reconstruction using a surgical microscope.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Nagasaki University Hospital (No. 20122102-2). The study is registered in UMIN-CTR as UMIN000042011. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at medical meetings.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Postoperative biliary complications in living donor liver transplantation are often difficult to treat.Lower incidence of biliary complication following biliary reconstruction using a surgical microscope has been reported.Facilities those use a surgical microscope for biliary reconstruction are limited.The first study to investigate the efficacy of surgical microscope for biliary construction in liver transplantation by randomized controlled trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":42077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323531/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative biliary complications in living donor liver transplantation are often difficult to treat, and if treatment is not successful, the patient's QOL is significantly reduced. The frequency of postoperative biliary complications is reported to be higher than that of deceased donor transplantation. In 2013, Lin et al. reported that while biliary reconstruction has traditionally used a surgical surgical loupe (2.5x-4.5x), biliary reconstruction using a surgical microscope (5x-15x) can reduce the incidence of complications. The objective of this study is to clarify the efficacy of biliary reconstruction using surgical microscope in living donor liver transplantation by a multi-facility, randomized comparative study.

Methods and analysis: It is an open-label randomized controlled study in which target patients who meet the registration requirements are randomly allocated to a surgical loupe group and a microscopy group after obtaining their consent (Ratio 1:1). The primary endpoint is an incidence of biliary complications (bile leakage and anastomotic biliary stricture) with Clavien-Dindo class III or higher within 52 weeks following surgery. The secondary endpoint is length of time required for biliary reconstruction using a surgical microscope.

Ethics and dissemination: This study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Nagasaki University Hospital (No. 20122102-2). The study is registered in UMIN-CTR as UMIN000042011. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at medical meetings.

Highlights: Postoperative biliary complications in living donor liver transplantation are often difficult to treat.Lower incidence of biliary complication following biliary reconstruction using a surgical microscope has been reported.Facilities those use a surgical microscope for biliary reconstruction are limited.The first study to investigate the efficacy of surgical microscope for biliary construction in liver transplantation by randomized controlled trial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活体肝移植手术显微镜下胆道重建疗效的多设备、随机对照研究。
活体供肝移植术后胆道并发症往往难以治疗,如果治疗不成功,患者的生活质量将显著降低。据报道,术后胆道并发症的发生率高于死亡供体移植。2013年,Lin等报道胆道重建传统上使用外科手术镜(2.5 -4.5倍),而手术显微镜(5 -15倍)胆道重建可以减少并发症的发生率。本研究的目的是通过一项多设施随机比较研究,阐明手术显微镜下胆道重建在活体肝移植中的疗效。方法与分析:该研究为开放标签随机对照研究,符合注册要求的目标患者经同意后随机分为手术镜组和显微镜组(比例为1:1)。主要终点是术后52周内Clavien-Dindo III级或以上胆道并发症(胆漏和吻合口胆道狭窄)的发生率。次要终点是手术显微镜下胆道重建所需的时间。伦理与传播:本研究方案已获得长崎大学医院机构审查委员会(No. 20122102-2)批准。该研究在UMIN-CTR中注册为UMIN000042011。所有参与者均需获得书面知情同意。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并将在医学会议上发表。重点:活体肝移植术后胆道并发症往往难以治疗。手术显微镜下胆道重建的胆道并发症发生率较低。使用外科显微镜进行胆道重建的设备有限。首次采用随机对照试验探讨手术显微镜对肝移植胆道构建的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: IJS Protocols is the first peer-reviewed, international, open access journal seeking to publish research protocols across across the full breadth of the surgical field. We are aim to provide rapid submission to decision times whilst maintaining a high quality peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer: a prospective cohort study Research protocol for an observational health data analysis to assess the applicability of randomized controlled trials focusing on newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer using real-world data: PIONEER IMI’s “big data for better outcomes” program Prophylactic slowly resorbable mesh in midline laparotomy to limit incisional hernia incidence: the prospective ‘Mesh Augmented Reinforcement of Abdominal Wall Suture Line (MARS)’ cohort study protocol Challenges during implant-assisted prosthetic rehabilitation in fibula reconstructed jaws and its management: a scoping review protocol The association of breast surgery ASPIRE: breast pain pathway rapid evaluation project - study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1