Prevalence of handheld laser device use, exposure and associated injury.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Reports Pub Date : 2021-08-18 DOI:10.25318/82-003-x202100800002-eng
Sami S Qutob, James P McNamee, John Than, Orly Brion
{"title":"Prevalence of handheld laser device use, exposure and associated injury.","authors":"Sami S Qutob,&nbsp;James P McNamee,&nbsp;John Than,&nbsp;Orly Brion","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202100800002-eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the use of and exposure to handheld laser devices by Canadians and the potential associated health risks.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>The 2019 Canadian Community Health Survey collected data from 12,397 Canadians on the prevalence of handheld laser exposure or use, and associated eye or skin injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2019, an estimated 12.4% (95% CI: 11.4% to 13.4%) of Canadians reported using a handheld laser device or being exposed to its beam in the previous year, and those between the ages of 12 and 17 represented 30.5% (95% CI: 26.6% to 34.4%) of users. The highest laser device use or exposure was among those with a university education (13.8%; 95% CI: 11.8% to 15.8%), and a significant trend was found over income categories (p < 0.0001). The highest prevalence of exposure or use involved laser pointers (69.4%; 95% CI: 65.4% to 73.4%), followed by laser toys (38.5%; 95% CI: 34.6% to 42.5%), laser torches (8.2%; 95% CI: 6.1% to 10.4%) and-lastly-search-and-rescue lasers (0.8%E; 95% CI: 0.3% to 1.2%). Overall, 0.7%E (95% CI: 0.2% to 1.2%) of Canadians reported discomfort or injury in the past 12 months. One-quarter (27.9%; 95% CI: 23.8% to 31.9%) of users had a laser beam intentionally directed toward their eyes or skin. Most users did not buy the device (56.3%; 95% CI: 52.1% to 60.5%), while 40.5% (95% CI: 36.2% to 44.7%) purchased it at a Canadian retail store or online (3.8%E; 95% CI: 2.6% to 5.0%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The prevalence of handheld laser device use and beam exposure was 12.4% (95% CI: 11.4% to 13.4%), representing approximately 3.9 million Canadians. While the number of reported injuries was low, ongoing surveillance helps assess the effectiveness of current risk management approaches for laser products.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"32 8","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202100800002-eng","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the use of and exposure to handheld laser devices by Canadians and the potential associated health risks.

Data and methods: The 2019 Canadian Community Health Survey collected data from 12,397 Canadians on the prevalence of handheld laser exposure or use, and associated eye or skin injuries.

Results: In 2019, an estimated 12.4% (95% CI: 11.4% to 13.4%) of Canadians reported using a handheld laser device or being exposed to its beam in the previous year, and those between the ages of 12 and 17 represented 30.5% (95% CI: 26.6% to 34.4%) of users. The highest laser device use or exposure was among those with a university education (13.8%; 95% CI: 11.8% to 15.8%), and a significant trend was found over income categories (p < 0.0001). The highest prevalence of exposure or use involved laser pointers (69.4%; 95% CI: 65.4% to 73.4%), followed by laser toys (38.5%; 95% CI: 34.6% to 42.5%), laser torches (8.2%; 95% CI: 6.1% to 10.4%) and-lastly-search-and-rescue lasers (0.8%E; 95% CI: 0.3% to 1.2%). Overall, 0.7%E (95% CI: 0.2% to 1.2%) of Canadians reported discomfort or injury in the past 12 months. One-quarter (27.9%; 95% CI: 23.8% to 31.9%) of users had a laser beam intentionally directed toward their eyes or skin. Most users did not buy the device (56.3%; 95% CI: 52.1% to 60.5%), while 40.5% (95% CI: 36.2% to 44.7%) purchased it at a Canadian retail store or online (3.8%E; 95% CI: 2.6% to 5.0%).

Discussion: The prevalence of handheld laser device use and beam exposure was 12.4% (95% CI: 11.4% to 13.4%), representing approximately 3.9 million Canadians. While the number of reported injuries was low, ongoing surveillance helps assess the effectiveness of current risk management approaches for laser products.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手持式激光设备的使用、暴露和相关伤害的流行程度。
背景:本研究评估了加拿大人手持式激光设备的使用和暴露情况以及潜在的相关健康风险。数据和方法:2019年加拿大社区健康调查收集了12,397名加拿大人关于手持式激光暴露或使用的流行程度以及相关的眼睛或皮肤损伤的数据。结果:2019年,估计有12.4% (95% CI: 11.4%至13.4%)的加拿大人报告在前一年使用手持式激光设备或暴露在其光束下,其中12至17岁的用户占30.5% (95% CI: 26.6%至34.4%)。使用或接触激光设备最多的是受过大学教育的人(13.8%;95% CI: 11.8%至15.8%),并且在收入类别中发现了显著的趋势(p < 0.0001)。接触或使用激光笔的患病率最高(69.4%;95%置信区间:65.4%至73.4%),其次是激光玩具(38.5%;95% CI: 34.6% ~ 42.5%),激光手电筒(8.2%;95% CI: 6.1%至10.4%)和最后的搜索和救援激光器(0.8%E;95% CI: 0.3% ~ 1.2%)。总体而言,在过去的12个月里,有0.7%的加拿大人(95% CI: 0.2%至1.2%)报告不适或受伤。四分之一(27.9%;95%置信区间:23.8%至31.9%)的用户有激光束故意指向他们的眼睛或皮肤。大多数用户没有购买设备(56.3%;95% CI: 52.1%至60.5%),而40.5% (95% CI: 36.2%至44.7%)在加拿大零售店或网上购买(3.8%E;95% CI: 2.6% ~ 5.0%)。讨论:手持激光设备使用和光束暴露的患病率为12.4% (95% CI: 11.4%至13.4%),约占390万加拿大人。虽然报告的伤害数量很低,但持续的监测有助于评估当前激光产品风险管理方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Reports
Health Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Health Reports publishes original research on diverse topics related to understanding and improving the health of populations and the delivery of health care. We publish studies based on analyses of Canadian national/provincial representative surveys or Canadian national/provincial administrative databases, as well as results of international comparative health research. Health Reports encourages the sharing of methodological information among those engaged in the analysis of health surveys or administrative databases. Use of the most current data available is advised for all submissions.
期刊最新文献
Mental health and access to support among 2SLGBTQ+ youth. Updated breast cancer costs for women by disease stage and phase of care using population-based databases. Child care for young children with disabilities. From BpTRU to OMRON: The impact of changing automated blood pressure measurement devices on adult population estimates of blood pressure and hypertension. Trends in household food insecurity from the Canadian Community Health Survey, 2017 to 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1