Vestibular socket therapy with immediate implant placement for managing compromised fresh extraction sockets: A prospective single-arm clinical study.

Abdelsalam Elaskary, Moataz Meabed, Iman Abd-ElWahab Radi
{"title":"Vestibular socket therapy with immediate implant placement for managing compromised fresh extraction sockets: A prospective single-arm clinical study.","authors":"Abdelsalam Elaskary,&nbsp;Moataz Meabed,&nbsp;Iman Abd-ElWahab Radi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess hard and soft tissues regenerated around immediate implants placed in compromised fresh extraction sockets using vestibular socket therapy 2 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-seven compromised fresh extraction sockets were managed using vestibular socket therapy and immediate implant placement. After immediate implant placement, a cortical bone shield was stabilised through a vestibular incision. The socket defect was filled with particulate bone graft. Labial plate thickness and bone height were evaluated 1 and 2 years postoperatively using CBCT. The pink aesthetic score and probing depth were recorded after 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. A Friedman test was used to study changes in the reported outcomes over time, with the level of statistical significance set at P ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All implants recorded a 100.0% survival rate. A statistically significant increase in bone height (0.93 mm, P = 0.004) and apical (0.12 mm, P = 0.026), midfacial (1.26 mm, P < 0.001) and crestal (0.86 mm, P < 0.001) bone thickness was observed after 2 years. The changes in pink aesthetic score and probing depth were not significant: the pink aesthetic score was 12.48 ± 1.45 and the mean PD was 2.37 ± 0.79 mm mesially, 2.11 ± 0.70 mm facially, 2.07 ± 1.04 mm distally and 1.00 ± 0.00 mm palatally after 2 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining immediate implant placement with vestibular socket therapy to manage compromised fresh extraction sockets offers promising radiographic, aesthetic and periodontal results while minimising the treatment time and number of surgical procedures required.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"14 3","pages":"307-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess hard and soft tissues regenerated around immediate implants placed in compromised fresh extraction sockets using vestibular socket therapy 2 years postoperatively.

Materials and methods: Twenty-seven compromised fresh extraction sockets were managed using vestibular socket therapy and immediate implant placement. After immediate implant placement, a cortical bone shield was stabilised through a vestibular incision. The socket defect was filled with particulate bone graft. Labial plate thickness and bone height were evaluated 1 and 2 years postoperatively using CBCT. The pink aesthetic score and probing depth were recorded after 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. A Friedman test was used to study changes in the reported outcomes over time, with the level of statistical significance set at P ≤ 0.05.

Results: All implants recorded a 100.0% survival rate. A statistically significant increase in bone height (0.93 mm, P = 0.004) and apical (0.12 mm, P = 0.026), midfacial (1.26 mm, P < 0.001) and crestal (0.86 mm, P < 0.001) bone thickness was observed after 2 years. The changes in pink aesthetic score and probing depth were not significant: the pink aesthetic score was 12.48 ± 1.45 and the mean PD was 2.37 ± 0.79 mm mesially, 2.11 ± 0.70 mm facially, 2.07 ± 1.04 mm distally and 1.00 ± 0.00 mm palatally after 2 years.

Conclusion: Combining immediate implant placement with vestibular socket therapy to manage compromised fresh extraction sockets offers promising radiographic, aesthetic and periodontal results while minimising the treatment time and number of surgical procedures required.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前庭窝治疗与立即植入处理受损新鲜拔牙窝:一项前瞻性单臂临床研究。
目的:评估在受损的新鲜拔牙槽内使用前庭槽治疗2年后立即种植体周围的硬软组织再生情况。材料和方法:27个受损的新鲜拔牙槽采用前庭槽治疗和立即种植。即刻植入后,通过前庭切口稳定皮质骨盾牌。骨窝缺损用颗粒骨移植物填充。术后1年和2年用CBCT评估唇板厚度和骨高度。术后6个月、1年、2年分别记录粉红色美学评分和探探深度。采用Friedman检验研究报告结果随时间的变化,P≤0.05为统计学显著性水平。结果:所有种植体成活率均为100.0%。2年后,骨高(0.93 mm, P = 0.004)、骨尖(0.12 mm, P = 0.026)、面中(1.26 mm, P < 0.001)、嵴(0.86 mm, P < 0.001)骨厚均有统计学意义的增加。2年后,粉色美学评分和探探深度的变化不显著:粉红色美学评分为12.48±1.45,平均PD为近端2.37±0.79 mm,面2.11±0.70 mm,远端2.07±1.04 mm,上颚1.00±0.00 mm。结论:结合前庭牙槽治疗治疗受损的新鲜拔牙槽提供了有希望的放射学,美学和牙周效果,同时最大限度地减少了治疗时间和所需的手术次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dental implants versus removable prostheses for the management of edentulous sites in patients with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: A systematic review of literature with a follow-up period of at least 3 years. Effect of the mesiodistal cantilever on implant-supported single crowns on biological and technical complications: A retrospective study. Setting up our patients' dental implants for long-term success. Submerged vertical bone augmentation of supraosseous peri-implant defects. The adjunctive use of systemic antibiotics in the non-surgical and surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1