Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies.

Urban transformations Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-18 DOI:10.1186/s42854-021-00024-2
Geoff Boeing, Max Besbris, David Wachsmuth, Jake Wegmann
{"title":"Tilted platforms: rental housing technology and the rise of urban big data oligopolies.","authors":"Geoff Boeing, Max Besbris, David Wachsmuth, Jake Wegmann","doi":"10.1186/s42854-021-00024-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This article interprets emerging scholarship on rental housing platforms-particularly the most well-known and used short- and long-term rental housing platforms-and considers how the technological processes connecting both short-term and long-term rentals to the platform economy are transforming cities. It discusses potential policy approaches to more equitably distribute benefits and mitigate harms. We argue that information technology is not value-neutral. While rental housing platforms may empower data analysts and certain market participants, the same cannot be said for all users or society at large. First, user-generated online data frequently reproduce the systematic biases found in traditional sources of housing information. Evidence is growing that the information broadcasting potential of rental housing platforms may increase rather than mitigate sociospatial inequality. Second, technology platforms curate and shape information according to their creators' own financial and political interests. The question of which data-and people-are hidden or marginalized on these platforms is just as important as the question of which data are available. Finally, important differences in benefits and drawbacks exist between short-term and long-term rental housing platforms, but are underexplored in the literature: this article unpacks these differences and proposes policy recommendations.</p><p><strong>Policy and practice recommendations: </strong>As rental housing technologies upend traditional market processes in favor of platform oligopolies, policymakers must reorient these processes toward the public good.Long-term and short-term rental platforms offer different market benefits and drawbacks, but the latter in particular requires proactive regulation to mitigate harm.At a minimum, policymakers must require that short-term rental platforms provide the information necessary for cities to enforce current, let alone new, housing regulations.Practitioners should be cautious inferring market conditions from rental housing platform data, due to difficult-to-measure sampling biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":75286,"journal":{"name":"Urban transformations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban transformations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00024-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This article interprets emerging scholarship on rental housing platforms-particularly the most well-known and used short- and long-term rental housing platforms-and considers how the technological processes connecting both short-term and long-term rentals to the platform economy are transforming cities. It discusses potential policy approaches to more equitably distribute benefits and mitigate harms. We argue that information technology is not value-neutral. While rental housing platforms may empower data analysts and certain market participants, the same cannot be said for all users or society at large. First, user-generated online data frequently reproduce the systematic biases found in traditional sources of housing information. Evidence is growing that the information broadcasting potential of rental housing platforms may increase rather than mitigate sociospatial inequality. Second, technology platforms curate and shape information according to their creators' own financial and political interests. The question of which data-and people-are hidden or marginalized on these platforms is just as important as the question of which data are available. Finally, important differences in benefits and drawbacks exist between short-term and long-term rental housing platforms, but are underexplored in the literature: this article unpacks these differences and proposes policy recommendations.

Policy and practice recommendations: As rental housing technologies upend traditional market processes in favor of platform oligopolies, policymakers must reorient these processes toward the public good.Long-term and short-term rental platforms offer different market benefits and drawbacks, but the latter in particular requires proactive regulation to mitigate harm.At a minimum, policymakers must require that short-term rental platforms provide the information necessary for cities to enforce current, let alone new, housing regulations.Practitioners should be cautious inferring market conditions from rental housing platform data, due to difficult-to-measure sampling biases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倾斜的平台:住房租赁技术与城市大数据寡头的崛起。
摘要:本文对新出现的住房租赁平台--尤其是最知名、最常用的短期和长期住房租赁平台--的学术研究进行了解读,并探讨了将短期和长期租赁与平台经济联系在一起的技术过程是如何改变城市的。报告讨论了更公平地分配利益和减轻危害的潜在政策方法。我们认为,信息技术并非价值中立。尽管住房租赁平台可能会增强数据分析师和某些市场参与者的能力,但对所有用户或整个社会来说却并非如此。首先,用户生成的在线数据经常重现传统住房信息来源中的系统性偏见。越来越多的证据表明,住房租赁平台的信息广播潜力可能会加剧而非缓解社会空间的不平等。其次,技术平台根据其创建者自身的经济和政治利益来策划和塑造信息。在这些平台上,哪些数据--哪些人--被隐藏或边缘化的问题与哪些数据是可用的问题同样重要。最后,短期住房租赁平台和长期住房租赁平台之间存在着重要的利弊差异,但相关文献却未对此进行深入探讨:本文对这些差异进行了解读,并提出了政策建议:由于住房租赁技术颠覆了传统的市场程序,有利于平台寡头垄断,政策制定者必须将这些程序重新定位为公共利益。长期和短期租赁平台提供了不同的市场利益和弊端,但后者尤其需要积极的监管来减轻危害。政策制定者至少必须要求短期租赁平台提供必要的信息,以便城市执行当前的住房法规,更不用说新法规了。由于难以衡量的抽样偏差,从业者应谨慎地从住房租赁平台数据中推断市场状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊最新文献
Urban governance arrangements for sustainability and justice – linking theory with experience Mapping the diversity & transformative potential of approaches to sustainable just cities Art, science, and life: where arts-based research and social-ecological transformation can meet Sites for sustainability transitions: the interplay of urban experiments and socio-spatial configurations in transforming habits Mobilising transformative community-based climate change adaptation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1