A Systematic Review of Systemic Treatment Options for Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.) Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-03-30 DOI:10.3233/kca-190078
Chelsea K Osterman, Tracy L Rose
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Systemic Treatment Options for Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Chelsea K Osterman,&nbsp;Tracy L Rose","doi":"10.3233/kca-190078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There have been a number of recent advances in the management of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, the majority of these studies excluded patients with non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC), and optimal management of nccRCC remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate systemic treatment options in locally advanced or metastatic nccRCC between 2000-2019. Randomized controlled trials, single-arm phase II-IV trials, and prospective analyses of medication access programs were included. The primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 studies were included in the final analysis. There was the highest level of evidence to support first-line treatment of nccRCC with sunitinib. Additional single-arm trials support the use of other vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors with axitinib and pazopanib, as well as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition with temsirolimus or everolimus +/- bevacizumab. Immune checkpoint inhibition has an emerging role in nccRCC, but optimal sequencing of available options is not clear. Prospective data to support the use of newer immunotherapy combinations are lacking. Treatment for collecting duct carcinoma remains platinum-based chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The availability of randomized trials in nccRCC is limited, and most studies include outcomes for nccRCC as a group, making conclusions about efficacy by subtype difficult. This systematic review supports consensus guidelines recommending sunitinib or clinical trial enrollment as preferred first-line treatment options for nccRCC, but also suggests a more nuanced approach to management and new options for therapy such as immune checkpoint inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/kca-190078","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/kca-190078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: There have been a number of recent advances in the management of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, the majority of these studies excluded patients with non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC), and optimal management of nccRCC remains unknown.

Materials and methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate systemic treatment options in locally advanced or metastatic nccRCC between 2000-2019. Randomized controlled trials, single-arm phase II-IV trials, and prospective analyses of medication access programs were included. The primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR).

Results: A total of 31 studies were included in the final analysis. There was the highest level of evidence to support first-line treatment of nccRCC with sunitinib. Additional single-arm trials support the use of other vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors with axitinib and pazopanib, as well as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition with temsirolimus or everolimus +/- bevacizumab. Immune checkpoint inhibition has an emerging role in nccRCC, but optimal sequencing of available options is not clear. Prospective data to support the use of newer immunotherapy combinations are lacking. Treatment for collecting duct carcinoma remains platinum-based chemotherapy.

Conclusions: The availability of randomized trials in nccRCC is limited, and most studies include outcomes for nccRCC as a group, making conclusions about efficacy by subtype difficult. This systematic review supports consensus guidelines recommending sunitinib or clinical trial enrollment as preferred first-line treatment options for nccRCC, but also suggests a more nuanced approach to management and new options for therapy such as immune checkpoint inhibition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期非透明细胞肾细胞癌系统治疗方案的系统综述。
引言:在晚期透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)的治疗方面有许多最新进展。然而,这些研究中的大多数都排除了非透明细胞RCC(nccRCC)患者,并且nccRCC的最佳管理仍然未知。材料和方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南对文献进行了系统综述,以评估2000-2019年间局部晚期或转移性nccRCC的系统治疗选择。包括随机对照试验、单臂II-IV期试验和药物获取计划的前瞻性分析。主要结果指标为无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和客观有效率(ORR)。结果:共有31项研究纳入最终分析。有最高水平的证据支持舒尼替尼一线治疗nccRCC。其他单臂试验支持使用其他血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂与阿西替尼和帕唑帕尼,以及哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶点(mTOR)抑制剂与替西罗莫司或依维莫司+/-贝伐单抗。免疫检查点抑制在nccRCC中具有新的作用,但可用选项的最佳测序尚不清楚。缺乏支持使用新型免疫疗法组合的前瞻性数据。收集管癌的治疗仍然是以铂为基础的化疗。结论:nccRCC随机试验的可用性有限,大多数研究都包括nccRCC作为一个组的结果,这使得很难按亚型得出疗效结论。这项系统综述支持共识指南,建议舒尼替尼或临床试验入选为nccRCC的首选一线治疗方案,但也提出了一种更细致的管理方法和新的治疗方案,如免疫检查点抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Second-Line Cabozantinib in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients After First-Line Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-based Combinations. Post-Metastasectomy Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Erratum to: Extended Disease Control with Unconventional Cabozantinib Dose Increase in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. A Systematic Review of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Clear-Cell Renal Cancer. Evaluating the Optimal Duration of Immunotherapy in Kidney Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1