Clinical outcomes of two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty in infected cases with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers produced using a handmade silicone mold.

IF 4.1 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Surgery & Related Research Pub Date : 2021-08-28 DOI:10.1186/s43019-021-00113-3
Takashi Hoshino, Toshifumi Watanabe, Yusuke Nakagawa, Hiroki Katagiri, Nobutake Ozeki, Toshiyuki Ohara, Mikio Shioda, Yuji Kono, Ichiro Sekiya, Hideyuki Koga
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty in infected cases with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers produced using a handmade silicone mold.","authors":"Takashi Hoshino,&nbsp;Toshifumi Watanabe,&nbsp;Yusuke Nakagawa,&nbsp;Hiroki Katagiri,&nbsp;Nobutake Ozeki,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Ohara,&nbsp;Mikio Shioda,&nbsp;Yuji Kono,&nbsp;Ichiro Sekiya,&nbsp;Hideyuki Koga","doi":"10.1186/s43019-021-00113-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the clinical outcomes of periprosthetic joint infection patients who underwent two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers fabricated using a handmade silicone mold.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included seven patients (average age 77 years, average follow-up time 54 months) who underwent surgery at our hospital between 2009 and 2013. Clinical outcomes including knee scores, function scores, knee range of motion, and walking ability at the final observation, period from the primary total knee arthroplasty to implant removal, period from implant removal to revision total knee arthroplasty, and follow-up period after revision total knee arthroplasty were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the final follow-up, the average knee range of motion was 99°, with no significant differences at each stage; average knee and function scores were 84 and 77, respectively. With cement spacers, five patients were able to walk with a t-cane. No recurrence of infection was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical outcomes of the current case series demonstrated good knee function with preserved walking ability, without any recurrence of periprosthetic joint infection. This study suggests that using a handmade silicone mold could be an effective option for periprosthetic joint infection after a total knee arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":17886,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","volume":"33 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8400397/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-021-00113-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: This study assessed the clinical outcomes of periprosthetic joint infection patients who underwent two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers fabricated using a handmade silicone mold.

Materials and methods: This study included seven patients (average age 77 years, average follow-up time 54 months) who underwent surgery at our hospital between 2009 and 2013. Clinical outcomes including knee scores, function scores, knee range of motion, and walking ability at the final observation, period from the primary total knee arthroplasty to implant removal, period from implant removal to revision total knee arthroplasty, and follow-up period after revision total knee arthroplasty were investigated.

Results: At the final follow-up, the average knee range of motion was 99°, with no significant differences at each stage; average knee and function scores were 84 and 77, respectively. With cement spacers, five patients were able to walk with a t-cane. No recurrence of infection was observed.

Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of the current case series demonstrated good knee function with preserved walking ability, without any recurrence of periprosthetic joint infection. This study suggests that using a handmade silicone mold could be an effective option for periprosthetic joint infection after a total knee arthroplasty.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用手工硅胶模具制作的含抗生素水泥垫片对感染病例进行两期翻修全膝关节置换术的临床效果
目的:本研究评估假体周围关节感染患者的临床结果,这些患者接受了两期翻修全膝关节置换术,使用手工硅胶模具制作抗生素负载水泥垫片。材料与方法:本研究纳入2009 - 2013年在我院行手术治疗的7例患者,平均年龄77岁,平均随访时间54个月。临床结果包括膝关节评分、功能评分、膝关节活动范围、最终观察时的行走能力、首次全膝关节置换术至取出假体的时间、取出假体至翻修全膝关节置换术的时间、翻修全膝关节置换术后的随访时间。结果:最终随访时,膝关节平均活动范围为99°,各阶段差异无统计学意义;平均膝关节和功能评分分别为84分和77分。有了水泥垫片,5名患者可以用t型手杖行走。未见感染复发。结论:本病例系列的临床结果显示膝关节功能良好,行走能力保留,无假体周围关节感染复发。本研究表明,在全膝关节置换术后,使用手工硅胶模具可能是假体周围关节感染的有效选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of radiographic factors affecting the significant differences in knee alignment between hip-to-talus and hip-to-calcaneus radiographs after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy Ramp lesion in anterior cruciate ligament injury: a review of the anatomy, biomechanics, epidemiology, and diagnosis. Total knee arthroplasty in dialysis patients: a national in-patient sample-based study of perioperative complications. Does body mass index influence improvement in patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis of 3918 cases. Home ownership, full-time employment, and other markers of higher socioeconomic status are predictive of shorter time to initial evaluation, shorter time to surgery, and superior postoperative outcomes among lateral patellar instability patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1