Consult Coordination Affects Patient Experience.

American journal of accountable care Pub Date : 2017-03-01
Steven D Pizer, Michael L Davies, Julia C Prentice
{"title":"Consult Coordination Affects Patient Experience.","authors":"Steven D Pizer,&nbsp;Michael L Davies,&nbsp;Julia C Prentice","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Medicare accountable care organization (ACO) program financially rewards ACOs for providing high-quality healthcare, and also factors in the patient experience of care. This study examined whether administrative measures of wait times for specialist consults are associated with self-reported patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Analyses used administrative and survey data from a clinically integrated healthcare system similar to an ACO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data from 2012 was obtained. Administrative access metrics included the number of days between the creation of the consult request and: 1) first action taken on the consult, 2) scheduling of the consult, and 3) completion of the consult. The Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients-which is modeled after the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems family of survey instruments used by ACOs to measure patient experience-provided the outcome measures. Outcomes included general VHA satisfaction measures and satisfaction with timeliness of care, including wait times for specialists and treatments. Logistic regression models predicted the likelihood of patients reporting being satisfied on each outcome. Models were risk adjusted for demographics, self-reported health, and healthcare use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Longer waits for the scheduling of consults and completed consults were found to be significantly associated with decreased patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because patients often report high levels of powerlessness and uncertainty while waiting for consultation, these wait times are an important patient-centered access metric for ACOs to consider. ACOs should have systems and tools in place to streamline the specialist consult referral process and increase care coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":72160,"journal":{"name":"American journal of accountable care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404203/pdf/nihms-1718527.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of accountable care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Medicare accountable care organization (ACO) program financially rewards ACOs for providing high-quality healthcare, and also factors in the patient experience of care. This study examined whether administrative measures of wait times for specialist consults are associated with self-reported patient satisfaction.

Study design: Analyses used administrative and survey data from a clinically integrated healthcare system similar to an ACO.

Methods: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data from 2012 was obtained. Administrative access metrics included the number of days between the creation of the consult request and: 1) first action taken on the consult, 2) scheduling of the consult, and 3) completion of the consult. The Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients-which is modeled after the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems family of survey instruments used by ACOs to measure patient experience-provided the outcome measures. Outcomes included general VHA satisfaction measures and satisfaction with timeliness of care, including wait times for specialists and treatments. Logistic regression models predicted the likelihood of patients reporting being satisfied on each outcome. Models were risk adjusted for demographics, self-reported health, and healthcare use.

Results: Longer waits for the scheduling of consults and completed consults were found to be significantly associated with decreased patient satisfaction.

Conclusions: Because patients often report high levels of powerlessness and uncertainty while waiting for consultation, these wait times are an important patient-centered access metric for ACOs to consider. ACOs should have systems and tools in place to streamline the specialist consult referral process and increase care coordination.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
会诊协调影响患者体验。
目的:医疗保险责任医疗组织(ACO)计划在经济上奖励提供高质量医疗保健的责任医疗组织,并考虑患者的护理体验。本研究考察了专科会诊等待时间的行政措施是否与自我报告的患者满意度有关。研究设计:分析使用来自类似于ACO的临床综合医疗保健系统的管理和调查数据。方法:获取2012年退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)数据。管理访问度量包括从创建咨询请求到以下日期之间的天数:1)对咨询采取的第一个操作,2)对咨询进行调度,以及3)完成咨询。患者医疗体验调查——模仿ACOs用来衡量患者体验的医疗服务提供者和系统系列调查工具的消费者评估——提供了结果测量。结果包括一般VHA满意度测量和对护理及时性的满意度,包括等待专家和治疗的时间。逻辑回归模型预测了患者报告对每个结果满意的可能性。根据人口统计学、自我报告的健康状况和医疗保健使用情况对模型进行了风险调整。结果:较长的等待会诊安排和完成会诊被发现与降低患者满意度显着相关。结论:由于患者在等待会诊时经常报告高水平的无力感和不确定性,这些等待时间是ACOs考虑的以患者为中心的重要访问指标。ACOs应该有适当的系统和工具来简化专家咨询转诊过程并加强护理协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary Care Case Conferences to Mitigate Social Determinants of Health: A Case Study from One FQHC System. Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Reduce Spending on Surgery. Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Reduce Spending on Surgery. Implementation Variation in Natural Experiments of State Health Policy Initiatives. Increased Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures Associated With Chronic Opioid Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1