The management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Is there a benefit to operate elderly patients?

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Translational Medicine at UniSa Pub Date : 2020-10-01 eCollection Date: 2020-09-01 DOI:10.37825/2239-9747.1017
N M Bouayed, A Sekkal
{"title":"The management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Is there a benefit to operate elderly patients?","authors":"N M Bouayed,&nbsp;A Sekkal","doi":"10.37825/2239-9747.1017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We present a retrospective study of a series of 40 patients over the age of 75 operated for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The results were evaluated during an average of 3 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>The study is retrospective and monocentric. The series includes 40 patients aged over 75 years and with an average age of 78.5 years (range 75-82). Patients underwent surgery for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis of more than 80%. The technique in all case was a carotid endarterectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There have been no postoperative deaths or neurological adverse events. During an average follow-up of 3 years, there was one death secondary to colon cancer. However, 5 patients were lost to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Carotid surgery in elderly patients may have a benefit. However, our study has shortcomings. It is retrospective and the patient cohort is reduced. A randomized, prospective study, comparing surgery or angioplasty with the best medical treatment, is necessary to choose the most effective and safest treatment to offer to an elderly patient with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370528/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37825/2239-9747.1017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: We present a retrospective study of a series of 40 patients over the age of 75 operated for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The results were evaluated during an average of 3 years of follow-up.

Material and method: The study is retrospective and monocentric. The series includes 40 patients aged over 75 years and with an average age of 78.5 years (range 75-82). Patients underwent surgery for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis of more than 80%. The technique in all case was a carotid endarterectomy.

Results: There have been no postoperative deaths or neurological adverse events. During an average follow-up of 3 years, there was one death secondary to colon cancer. However, 5 patients were lost to follow-up.

Conclusion: Carotid surgery in elderly patients may have a benefit. However, our study has shortcomings. It is retrospective and the patient cohort is reduced. A randomized, prospective study, comparing surgery or angioplasty with the best medical treatment, is necessary to choose the most effective and safest treatment to offer to an elderly patient with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无症状颈动脉狭窄的治疗:老年患者手术是否有好处?
背景:我们对40名75岁以上的无症状颈动脉狭窄患者进行了回顾性研究。在平均3年的随访中对结果进行了评估。材料与方法:本研究为回顾性、单中心研究。该系列包括40名年龄在75岁以上的患者,平均年龄为78.5岁(75-82岁)。患者接受了超过80%的无症状颈动脉狭窄的手术。所有病例的技术都是颈动脉内膜切除术。结果:无术后死亡或神经系统不良事件。在平均3年的随访中,有一例死于癌症。然而,有5名患者在随访中丢失。结论:颈动脉手术治疗老年患者可能有一定的疗效。然而,我们的研究存在不足。它具有回顾性,患者队列减少。有必要对无症状颈动脉狭窄的老年患者进行随机、前瞻性研究,将手术或血管成形术与最佳药物治疗进行比较,以选择最有效、最安全的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Medicine at UniSa
Translational Medicine at UniSa MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Anaesthesiologist-led Multidisciplinary Model for Evaluating High-risk Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Surgical Patients. Instrumental Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta and Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes: Literature Review and Observational Study. Physical Activity in Cancer Rehabilitation and Technology Acceptance: Results From the "Oncology in Motion" Project. Novel Targets and Strategies Addressing Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Post-acute Coronary Syndromes Patients. Telerehabilitation: A Solution for Patients After Hip Fracture?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1