Early response evaluation using 18F-FDG-PET/CT does not influence management of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with palliative intent.

IF 1.2 Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-03 DOI:10.1055/a-1542-6211
Sheima Farag, Nikki S IJzerman, Matthijs P M Houdijk, An K L Reyners, Anne Ij Arens, Dirk J Grünhagen, Ingrid M E Desar, Hans Gelderblom, Neeltje Steeghs, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
{"title":"Early response evaluation using 18F-FDG-PET/CT does not influence management of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with palliative intent.","authors":"Sheima Farag,&nbsp;Nikki S IJzerman,&nbsp;Matthijs P M Houdijk,&nbsp;An K L Reyners,&nbsp;Anne Ij Arens,&nbsp;Dirk J Grünhagen,&nbsp;Ingrid M E Desar,&nbsp;Hans Gelderblom,&nbsp;Neeltje Steeghs,&nbsp;Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei","doi":"10.1055/a-1542-6211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT on treatment decision making in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively evaluated <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT scans to monitor response of metastatic GIST patients treated with palliative intent. Data from the Dutch GIST Registry was used. Early scans (<10 weeks after start of treatment) and late scans (>10 weeks after start of treatment) were scored on the impact in change of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one PET/CT scans were performed for treatment evaluation in 39 patients with metastatic GIST of which 36 were early scans and 25 were late scans. Early PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 5.6% of patients and late PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 56% of patients. Change in management was more often seen after scans with lack of metabolic response (48% vs. 11% in scans with metabolic response, p=0.002). Neither metabolic response nor change in treatment were more often seen in patients with <i>KIT</i> mutations compared to patients with non-<i>KIT</i> mutations (metabolic response 65% <i>KIT</i> vs. 46% non-<i>KIT</i>, p=0.33, and change in management 28% <i>KIT</i> vs. 21% non-<i>KIT</i>, p=0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT is not recommended for early response evaluation in an unselected patient population with metastatic GIST, since it does not influence treatment decisions. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT, however, can be useful for late response assessment, especially in case of indeterminate CT results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":"411-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1542-6211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT on treatment decision making in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients.

Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans to monitor response of metastatic GIST patients treated with palliative intent. Data from the Dutch GIST Registry was used. Early scans (<10 weeks after start of treatment) and late scans (>10 weeks after start of treatment) were scored on the impact in change of treatment.

Results: Sixty-one PET/CT scans were performed for treatment evaluation in 39 patients with metastatic GIST of which 36 were early scans and 25 were late scans. Early PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 5.6% of patients and late PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 56% of patients. Change in management was more often seen after scans with lack of metabolic response (48% vs. 11% in scans with metabolic response, p=0.002). Neither metabolic response nor change in treatment were more often seen in patients with KIT mutations compared to patients with non-KIT mutations (metabolic response 65% KIT vs. 46% non-KIT, p=0.33, and change in management 28% KIT vs. 21% non-KIT, p=0.74).

Conclusion: 18F-FDG-PET/CT is not recommended for early response evaluation in an unselected patient population with metastatic GIST, since it does not influence treatment decisions. 18F-FDG-PET/CT, however, can be useful for late response assessment, especially in case of indeterminate CT results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用18F-FDG-PET/CT进行早期反应评估并不影响以姑息治疗为目的的转移性胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者的管理。
目的:本研究旨在探讨18F-FDG-PET/CT对转移性胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者治疗决策的影响。方法:本研究回顾性评估18F-FDG-PET/CT扫描监测转移性GIST患者姑息治疗的反应。数据来自荷兰GIST登记处。早期扫描(治疗开始后10周)对治疗变化的影响进行评分。结果:39例转移性GIST患者进行了61次PET/CT扫描进行治疗评估,其中36例为早期扫描,25例为晚期扫描。早期PET/CT扫描导致5.6%的患者管理发生变化,晚期PET/CT扫描导致56%的患者管理发生变化。治疗方法的改变在缺乏代谢反应的扫描后更为常见(48%对11%的代谢反应扫描,p=0.002)。与非KIT突变患者相比,KIT突变患者的代谢反应和治疗变化都不常见(代谢反应65% KIT vs 46%非KIT, p=0.33,管理变化28% KIT vs 21%非KIT, p=0.74)。结论:18F-FDG-PET/CT不推荐用于未选择的转移性GIST患者群体的早期反应评估,因为它不影响治疗决策。然而,18F-FDG-PET/CT可用于晚期反应评估,特别是在CT结果不确定的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emerging Theranostic Targets in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Radioactive Gold Isotopes in the Era of Theranostics: Medical Potential of ¹⁹⁸Au and ¹⁹⁹Au Radioisotopes. Radioiodine Therapy Unit as a "No-Care" Ward - A First Experience Report. Myocardial Perfusion SPECT 2024 in Germany: Results of the 10th Survey. Prognostic Significance of CD68+ Macrophages and FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells in Neuroendocrine Tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1