Early response evaluation using 18F-FDG-PET/CT does not influence management of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with palliative intent.
Sheima Farag, Nikki S IJzerman, Matthijs P M Houdijk, An K L Reyners, Anne Ij Arens, Dirk J Grünhagen, Ingrid M E Desar, Hans Gelderblom, Neeltje Steeghs, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
{"title":"Early response evaluation using 18F-FDG-PET/CT does not influence management of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with palliative intent.","authors":"Sheima Farag, Nikki S IJzerman, Matthijs P M Houdijk, An K L Reyners, Anne Ij Arens, Dirk J Grünhagen, Ingrid M E Desar, Hans Gelderblom, Neeltje Steeghs, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei","doi":"10.1055/a-1542-6211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT on treatment decision making in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively evaluated <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT scans to monitor response of metastatic GIST patients treated with palliative intent. Data from the Dutch GIST Registry was used. Early scans (<10 weeks after start of treatment) and late scans (>10 weeks after start of treatment) were scored on the impact in change of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one PET/CT scans were performed for treatment evaluation in 39 patients with metastatic GIST of which 36 were early scans and 25 were late scans. Early PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 5.6% of patients and late PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 56% of patients. Change in management was more often seen after scans with lack of metabolic response (48% vs. 11% in scans with metabolic response, p=0.002). Neither metabolic response nor change in treatment were more often seen in patients with <i>KIT</i> mutations compared to patients with non-<i>KIT</i> mutations (metabolic response 65% <i>KIT</i> vs. 46% non-<i>KIT</i>, p=0.33, and change in management 28% <i>KIT</i> vs. 21% non-<i>KIT</i>, p=0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT is not recommended for early response evaluation in an unselected patient population with metastatic GIST, since it does not influence treatment decisions. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT, however, can be useful for late response assessment, especially in case of indeterminate CT results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":"411-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1542-6211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT on treatment decision making in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients.
Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans to monitor response of metastatic GIST patients treated with palliative intent. Data from the Dutch GIST Registry was used. Early scans (<10 weeks after start of treatment) and late scans (>10 weeks after start of treatment) were scored on the impact in change of treatment.
Results: Sixty-one PET/CT scans were performed for treatment evaluation in 39 patients with metastatic GIST of which 36 were early scans and 25 were late scans. Early PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 5.6% of patients and late PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 56% of patients. Change in management was more often seen after scans with lack of metabolic response (48% vs. 11% in scans with metabolic response, p=0.002). Neither metabolic response nor change in treatment were more often seen in patients with KIT mutations compared to patients with non-KIT mutations (metabolic response 65% KIT vs. 46% non-KIT, p=0.33, and change in management 28% KIT vs. 21% non-KIT, p=0.74).
Conclusion: 18F-FDG-PET/CT is not recommended for early response evaluation in an unselected patient population with metastatic GIST, since it does not influence treatment decisions. 18F-FDG-PET/CT, however, can be useful for late response assessment, especially in case of indeterminate CT results.
目的:本研究旨在探讨18F-FDG-PET/CT对转移性胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者治疗决策的影响。方法:本研究回顾性评估18F-FDG-PET/CT扫描监测转移性GIST患者姑息治疗的反应。数据来自荷兰GIST登记处。早期扫描(治疗开始后10周)对治疗变化的影响进行评分。结果:39例转移性GIST患者进行了61次PET/CT扫描进行治疗评估,其中36例为早期扫描,25例为晚期扫描。早期PET/CT扫描导致5.6%的患者管理发生变化,晚期PET/CT扫描导致56%的患者管理发生变化。治疗方法的改变在缺乏代谢反应的扫描后更为常见(48%对11%的代谢反应扫描,p=0.002)。与非KIT突变患者相比,KIT突变患者的代谢反应和治疗变化都不常见(代谢反应65% KIT vs 46%非KIT, p=0.33,管理变化28% KIT vs 21%非KIT, p=0.74)。结论:18F-FDG-PET/CT不推荐用于未选择的转移性GIST患者群体的早期反应评估,因为它不影响治疗决策。然而,18F-FDG-PET/CT可用于晚期反应评估,特别是在CT结果不确定的情况下。