COVID-19 related olfactory dysfunction prevalence and natural history in ambulatory patients.

Rhinology online Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-13 DOI:10.4193/rhinol/21.034
Daniel R Bacon, Princess Onuorah, Alexander Murr, Christopher A Wiesen, Jonathan Oakes, Brian D Thorp, Adam M Zanation, Charles S Ebert, David Wohl, Brent A Senior, Adam J Kimple
{"title":"COVID-19 related olfactory dysfunction prevalence and natural history in ambulatory patients.","authors":"Daniel R Bacon,&nbsp;Princess Onuorah,&nbsp;Alexander Murr,&nbsp;Christopher A Wiesen,&nbsp;Jonathan Oakes,&nbsp;Brian D Thorp,&nbsp;Adam M Zanation,&nbsp;Charles S Ebert,&nbsp;David Wohl,&nbsp;Brent A Senior,&nbsp;Adam J Kimple","doi":"10.4193/rhinol/21.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding prevalence of COVID-19 related Olfactory dysfunction (OD) among ambulatory patients is highly variable due to heterogeneity in study population and measurement methods. Relatively few studies have longitudinally investigated OD in ambulatory patients with objective methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a longitudinal study to investigate OD among COVID-19 ambulatory patients compared to symptomatic controls who test negative. Out of 81 patients enrolled, 45 COVID-19 positive patients and an age- and sex-matched symptomatic control group completed the BSIT and a questionnaire about smell, taste and nasal symptoms. These were repeated at 1 month for all COVID-19 positive patients, and again at 3 months for those who exhibited persistent OD. Analysis was performed by mixed-effects linear and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>46.7% of COVID-19 patients compared to 3.8% of symptomatic controls exhibited OD at 1-week post diagnosis (p<0.001). At 1 month, 16.7%, (6 of 36), of COVID-19 patients had persistent OD. Mean improvement in BSIT score in COVID-19 patients between 1-week BSIT and 1 month follow-up was 2.0 (95% CI 1.00 - 3.00, p<0.001). OD did not correlate with nasal congestion (r= -0.25, 95% CI, -0.52 to 0.06, p=0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ambulatory COVID-19 patients exhibited OD significantly more frequently than symptomatic controls. Most patients regained normal olfaction by 1 month. The BSIT is a simple validated and objective test to investigate the prevalence of OD in ambulatory patients. OD did not correlate with nasal congestion which suggests a congestion-independent mechanism of OD.</p>","PeriodicalId":74737,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology online","volume":"4 4","pages":"131-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415759/pdf/nihms-1732007.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/rhinol/21.034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding prevalence of COVID-19 related Olfactory dysfunction (OD) among ambulatory patients is highly variable due to heterogeneity in study population and measurement methods. Relatively few studies have longitudinally investigated OD in ambulatory patients with objective methods.

Methods: We performed a longitudinal study to investigate OD among COVID-19 ambulatory patients compared to symptomatic controls who test negative. Out of 81 patients enrolled, 45 COVID-19 positive patients and an age- and sex-matched symptomatic control group completed the BSIT and a questionnaire about smell, taste and nasal symptoms. These were repeated at 1 month for all COVID-19 positive patients, and again at 3 months for those who exhibited persistent OD. Analysis was performed by mixed-effects linear and logistic regression.

Results: 46.7% of COVID-19 patients compared to 3.8% of symptomatic controls exhibited OD at 1-week post diagnosis (p<0.001). At 1 month, 16.7%, (6 of 36), of COVID-19 patients had persistent OD. Mean improvement in BSIT score in COVID-19 patients between 1-week BSIT and 1 month follow-up was 2.0 (95% CI 1.00 - 3.00, p<0.001). OD did not correlate with nasal congestion (r= -0.25, 95% CI, -0.52 to 0.06, p=0.12).

Conclusions: Ambulatory COVID-19 patients exhibited OD significantly more frequently than symptomatic controls. Most patients regained normal olfaction by 1 month. The BSIT is a simple validated and objective test to investigate the prevalence of OD in ambulatory patients. OD did not correlate with nasal congestion which suggests a congestion-independent mechanism of OD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非住院患者新冠肺炎相关嗅觉功能障碍患病率及自然病史分析
背景:由于研究人群和测量方法的异质性,门诊患者中与COVID-19相关的嗅觉功能障碍(OD)患病率的证据差异很大。相对较少的研究以客观的方法对门诊患者的OD进行纵向调查。方法:我们进行了一项纵向研究,将COVID-19门诊患者的OD与检测阴性的症状对照组进行比较。在入组的81名患者中,45名COVID-19阳性患者和年龄和性别匹配的症状对照组完成了BSIT和关于嗅觉、味觉和鼻腔症状的问卷调查。对所有COVID-19阳性患者在1个月时重复这些,对那些表现出持续性用药过量的患者在3个月时再次重复这些。采用混合效应线性回归和逻辑回归进行分析。结果:在诊断后1周,46.7%的COVID-19患者出现OD,而症状对照组为3.8%(结论:门诊COVID-19患者出现OD的频率明显高于症状对照组)。大多数患者在1个月后恢复正常嗅觉。BSIT是一种简单、有效且客观的测试,用于调查门诊患者的OD患病率。用药过量与鼻塞无关,提示用药过量与鼻塞无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 control protocol for rhinologic surgery Trends in dupilumab persistence among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps Dupilumab as an emerging treatment for refractory allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: a case series and literature review Capturing qualitative olfactory dysfunction with PARPHAIT: the parosmia, phantosmia, and anosmia test Prevalence of smell and taste dysfunction in different clinical severity groups of COVID-19 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1