The Use of Androgen Priming in Women with Reduced Ovarian Reserve Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Seminars in reproductive medicine Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-09 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1735646
Alison Richardson, Kanna Jayaprakasan
{"title":"The Use of Androgen Priming in Women with Reduced Ovarian Reserve Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology.","authors":"Alison Richardson,&nbsp;Kanna Jayaprakasan","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1735646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Androgen priming with either dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) or testosterone has been suggested as an adjunct to improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Numerous studies have investigated the effects of both DHEA and testosterone on IVF outcome. The results were inconsistent, and the quality of most studies is substandard. Meta-analyses have consistently reported that DHEA does appear to significantly improve IVF outcome in women with predicted or proven poor ovarian response (POR), but these have included some normal responders and/or nonrandomized studies. Our meta-analyses including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) incorporating only women with DOR or POR suggest that DHEA confers no benefit. While meta-analyses of RCTs on the use of testosterone in women with DOR or POR showed an improved IVF outcome, most studies included are of low quality with high risk of bias. When analysis of data from studies of only low-risk bias was performed, such a benefit with testosterone was not observed. Although recruitment may well be a challenge, a large, well-designed RCT is, however, still warranted to investigate whether or not androgen priming with either DHEA or testosterone should be recommended as an adjuvant treatment for women with DOR or POR undergoing IVF.</p>","PeriodicalId":21661,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in reproductive medicine","volume":"39 5-06","pages":"207-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735646","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Androgen priming with either dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) or testosterone has been suggested as an adjunct to improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Numerous studies have investigated the effects of both DHEA and testosterone on IVF outcome. The results were inconsistent, and the quality of most studies is substandard. Meta-analyses have consistently reported that DHEA does appear to significantly improve IVF outcome in women with predicted or proven poor ovarian response (POR), but these have included some normal responders and/or nonrandomized studies. Our meta-analyses including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) incorporating only women with DOR or POR suggest that DHEA confers no benefit. While meta-analyses of RCTs on the use of testosterone in women with DOR or POR showed an improved IVF outcome, most studies included are of low quality with high risk of bias. When analysis of data from studies of only low-risk bias was performed, such a benefit with testosterone was not observed. Although recruitment may well be a challenge, a large, well-designed RCT is, however, still warranted to investigate whether or not androgen priming with either DHEA or testosterone should be recommended as an adjuvant treatment for women with DOR or POR undergoing IVF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雄激素启动在辅助生殖技术卵巢储备减少的妇女中的应用。
用脱氢表雄酮(DHEA)或睾酮进行雄激素启动已被认为是改善卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)妇女体外受精(IVF)结果的辅助手段。许多研究调查了脱氢表雄酮和睾酮对体外受精结果的影响。结果是不一致的,大多数研究的质量是不合格的。荟萃分析一致报道,DHEA确实显着改善了预测或证实卵巢反应不良(POR)的妇女的体外受精结果,但这些研究包括一些正常反应和/或非随机研究。我们的荟萃分析包括随机对照试验(rct),仅纳入DOR或POR的女性,表明脱氢表雄酮没有益处。虽然对DOR或POR妇女使用睾酮的随机对照试验的荟萃分析显示体外受精结果有所改善,但大多数纳入的研究质量低,偏倚风险高。当仅对低风险偏倚的研究数据进行分析时,没有观察到睾酮的这种益处。尽管招募可能是一个挑战,但一个大型的、设计良好的随机对照试验仍然有必要调查是否应该推荐用脱氢表雄酮或睾酮作为DOR或POR接受体外受精的女性的辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in reproductive medicine
Seminars in reproductive medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Reproductive Medicine is a bi-monthly topic driven review journal that provides in-depth coverage of important advances in the understanding of normal and disordered human reproductive function, as well as new diagnostic and interventional techniques. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine offers an informed perspective on issues like male and female infertility, reproductive physiology, pharmacological hormonal manipulation, and state-of-the-art assisted reproductive technologies.
期刊最新文献
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Pregnancy: Managing Disease Activity and Fertility Concerns. Impact of Antiphospholipid Syndrome on Reproductive Outcomes: Current Insights and Management Approaches. A Review of Celiac Disease and Its Implications on Fertility and Pregnancy. Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Reproductive Health: A Focus on Pregnancy Planning and Outcomes. Type 1 Diabetes and Pregnancy: Challenges in Glycemic Control and Maternal-Fetal Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1