Underlying reasons why some people haven't tested for HIV - a discourse analysis of qualitative data from Cape Town, South Africa.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Sahara J-Journal of Social Aspects of Hiv-Aids Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1080/17290376.2021.1977686
Kyla Meyerson, Graeme Hoddinott, Tamryn Nicholson, Sue-Ann Meehan
{"title":"Underlying reasons why some people haven't tested for HIV - a discourse analysis of qualitative data from Cape Town, South Africa.","authors":"Kyla Meyerson,&nbsp;Graeme Hoddinott,&nbsp;Tamryn Nicholson,&nbsp;Sue-Ann Meehan","doi":"10.1080/17290376.2021.1977686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reported barriers to HIV testing over the last 15 years have remained consistent, despite improved service offerings. We aimed to probe deeper by exploring how people who have never tested construct HIV testing in their talk. We used this to suggest underlying psychosocial barriers to testing even when there is high availability. We enrolled 14 participants who reported that they had never tested for HIV and conducted individual, open-ended interviews. The data were organised thematically with theory-generative interpretations informed by discourse analysis. Reasons for not testing reported reflect similar barriers identified in previous research. Deeper probing identified three discursive processes by which participants explained why they had never tested for HIV, suggesting that the way participants used 'reasons' in their talk is an indicator that the participants were repeating 'tropes'. While aware of HIV testing facilities, participants still chose not to test. Influences on the choice to test or not were positioned as outside of the person's control. These findings suggest that there <i>are</i> deeper reasons why some people have not tested and that these will not be resolved through merely increasing accessibility to testing services. We recommend increased consideration of the psychosocial implications of testing in service delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":45939,"journal":{"name":"Sahara J-Journal of Social Aspects of Hiv-Aids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sahara J-Journal of Social Aspects of Hiv-Aids","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17290376.2021.1977686","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reported barriers to HIV testing over the last 15 years have remained consistent, despite improved service offerings. We aimed to probe deeper by exploring how people who have never tested construct HIV testing in their talk. We used this to suggest underlying psychosocial barriers to testing even when there is high availability. We enrolled 14 participants who reported that they had never tested for HIV and conducted individual, open-ended interviews. The data were organised thematically with theory-generative interpretations informed by discourse analysis. Reasons for not testing reported reflect similar barriers identified in previous research. Deeper probing identified three discursive processes by which participants explained why they had never tested for HIV, suggesting that the way participants used 'reasons' in their talk is an indicator that the participants were repeating 'tropes'. While aware of HIV testing facilities, participants still chose not to test. Influences on the choice to test or not were positioned as outside of the person's control. These findings suggest that there are deeper reasons why some people have not tested and that these will not be resolved through merely increasing accessibility to testing services. We recommend increased consideration of the psychosocial implications of testing in service delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一些人没有进行艾滋病毒检测的潜在原因——对南非开普敦定性数据的话语分析。
在过去15年中,尽管提供的服务有所改善,但报告的艾滋病毒检测障碍仍然存在。我们的目标是通过探索从未检测过的人如何在他们的谈话中构建艾滋病毒检测来进行更深入的探索。我们用它来提示潜在的心理障碍测试,即使有很高的可用性。我们招募了14名参与者,他们报告说他们从未检测过艾滋病毒,并进行了个人的开放式访谈。数据按主题组织,并通过语篇分析提供理论生成解释。未检测报告的原因反映了先前研究中发现的类似障碍。更深入的探索发现了参与者解释为什么他们从未检测过艾滋病毒的三个话语过程,这表明参与者在他们的谈话中使用“理由”的方式表明参与者在重复“比喻”。虽然知道艾滋病检测设施,但参与者仍然选择不进行检测。选择测试或不测试的影响被定位为不在个人控制范围之内。这些发现表明,有些人没有接受检测有更深层次的原因,而这些原因不能仅仅通过增加检测服务的可及性来解决。我们建议在提供服务时更多地考虑检测的社会心理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes contributions in English and French from all fields of social aspects of HIV/AIDS (care, support, behaviour change, behavioural surveillance, counselling, impact, mitigation, stigma, discrimination, prevention, treatment, adherence, culture, faith-based approaches, evidence-based intervention, health communication, structural and environmental intervention, financing, policy, media, etc).
期刊最新文献
Provision of HIV testing services and its impact on the HIV positivity rate in the public health sector in KwaZulu-Natal: a ten-year review. Sexual behaviour among Kenyan adolescents enrolled in an efficacy trial of a smartphone game to prevent HIV: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data. Spatial variations in STIs among women enrolled in HIV prevention clinical trials in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Factors influencing the adoption of HIV prevention measures in low socio-economic communities of inner-city Durban, South Africa. " …  [I]f I can [be] infected now that means I am going to die … ": an explorative study focusing on vulnerable, immunocompromised groups and caregivers experiences and perceptions of the Covid-19 pandemic in South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1