Tools and Techniques Used With Robotic Devices to Quantify Upper-Limb Function in Typically Developing Children: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.3 Q1 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Process and Outcome Pub Date : 2020-12-14 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179572720979013
Stephan Cd Dobri, Hana M Ready, Theresa Claire Davies
{"title":"Tools and Techniques Used With Robotic Devices to Quantify Upper-Limb Function in Typically Developing Children: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Stephan Cd Dobri,&nbsp;Hana M Ready,&nbsp;Theresa Claire Davies","doi":"10.1177/1179572720979013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic devices have been used to quantify function, identify impairment, and rehabilitate motor function extensively in adults, but less-so in younger populations. The ability to perform motor actions improves as children grow. It is important to quantify this rate of change of the neurotypical population before attempting to identify impairment and target rehabilitation techniques.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>For a population of typically developing children, this systematic review identifies and analyzes tools and techniques used with robotic devices to quantify upper-limb motor function. Since most of the papers also used robotic devices to compare function of neurotypical to pathological populations, a secondary objective was introduced to relate clinical outcome measures to identified robotic tools and techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched between February 2019 and August 2020, and 226 articles were found, 19 of which are included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robotic devices, tasks, outcome measures, and clinical assessments were not consistent among studies from different settings but were consistent within laboratory groups. Fifteen of the 19 articles evaluated both typically developing and pathological populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To optimize universally comparable outcomes in future work, it is recommended that a standard set of tasks and measures is used to assess upper-limb motor function. Standardized tasks and measures will facilitate effective rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":41347,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Process and Outcome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179572720979013","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Process and Outcome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179572720979013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Robotic devices have been used to quantify function, identify impairment, and rehabilitate motor function extensively in adults, but less-so in younger populations. The ability to perform motor actions improves as children grow. It is important to quantify this rate of change of the neurotypical population before attempting to identify impairment and target rehabilitation techniques.

Objectives: For a population of typically developing children, this systematic review identifies and analyzes tools and techniques used with robotic devices to quantify upper-limb motor function. Since most of the papers also used robotic devices to compare function of neurotypical to pathological populations, a secondary objective was introduced to relate clinical outcome measures to identified robotic tools and techniques.

Methods: Five databases were searched between February 2019 and August 2020, and 226 articles were found, 19 of which are included in the review.

Results: Robotic devices, tasks, outcome measures, and clinical assessments were not consistent among studies from different settings but were consistent within laboratory groups. Fifteen of the 19 articles evaluated both typically developing and pathological populations.

Conclusion: To optimize universally comparable outcomes in future work, it is recommended that a standard set of tasks and measures is used to assess upper-limb motor function. Standardized tasks and measures will facilitate effective rehabilitation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与机器人设备一起用于量化典型发育儿童上肢功能的工具和技术:系统综述。
背景:机器人设备已广泛用于成人的功能量化、识别损伤和运动功能康复,但在年轻人群中应用较少。随着孩子的成长,运动能力也会提高。在试图确定损伤和目标康复技术之前,量化神经典型人群的这种变化率是很重要的。目的:对于典型发育的儿童群体,本系统综述确定并分析了机器人设备用于量化上肢运动功能的工具和技术。由于大多数论文也使用机器人设备来比较神经正常人群和病理人群的功能,因此引入了第二个目标,将临床结果测量与确定的机器人工具和技术联系起来。方法:检索2019年2月- 2020年8月5个数据库,共检索到226篇文献,其中19篇纳入综述。结果:机器人设备、任务、结果测量和临床评估在不同环境的研究中不一致,但在实验室组中是一致的。19篇文章中有15篇评估了典型发育人群和病态人群。结论:为了在未来的工作中优化普遍可比较的结果,建议使用一套标准的任务和测量方法来评估上肢运动功能。标准化的任务和措施有利于有效的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advances in Rehabilitation Science and Practice (AdvRSP) Editorial: A Journal Showcasing Exciting Developments in the Field of Rehabilitation in Medical Conditions. A Proposal for Expansion of the Medical Specialty of Rehabilitation Medicine. Verification of the Integrative Model of Adjustment to Chronic Conditions by Mapping it Onto the World Health Organization's International Classification of Function, Disability and Health. TEleRehabilitation Nepal (TERN) for People With Spinal Cord Injury and Acquired Brain Injury: A Feasibility Study. Remote Delivery of Service: A Survey of Occupational Therapists' Perceptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1