Dissipation, Fate, and Toxicity of Crop Protection Chemical Safeners in Aquatic Environments.

IF 6.1 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1007/398_2021_70
Femi F Oloye, Oluwabunmi P Femi-Oloye, Jonathan K Challis, Paul D Jones, John P Giesy
{"title":"Dissipation, Fate, and Toxicity of Crop Protection Chemical Safeners in Aquatic Environments.","authors":"Femi F Oloye,&nbsp;Oluwabunmi P Femi-Oloye,&nbsp;Jonathan K Challis,&nbsp;Paul D Jones,&nbsp;John P Giesy","doi":"10.1007/398_2021_70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safeners are a group of chemicals applied with herbicides to protect crop plants from potential adverse effects of agricultural products used to kill weeds in monocotyledonous crops. Various routes of dissipation of safeners from their point of applications were evaluated. Despite the large numbers of safeners (over 18) commercially available and the relatively large quantities (~2 × 10<sup>6</sup> kg/year) used, there is little information on their mobility and fate in the environment and occurrence in various environmental matrices. The only class of safeners for which a significant amount of information is available is dichloroacetamide safeners, which have been observed in some rivers in the USA at concentrations ranging from 42 to 190 ng/L. Given this gap in the literature, there is a clear need to determine the occurrence, fate, and bioavailability of other classes of safeners. Furthermore, since safeners are typically used in commercial formulations, it is useful to study them in relation to their corresponding herbicides. Common routes of dissipation for herbicides and applied safeners are surface run off (erosion), hydrolysis, photolysis, sorption, leaching, volatilization, and microbial degradation. Toxic potencies of safeners vary among organisms and safener compounds, ranging from as low as the LC<sub>50</sub> for fish (Oncorhynchus mykiss) for isoxadifen-ethyl, which was 0.34 mg/L, to as high as the LC<sub>50</sub> for Daphnia magna from dichlormid, which was 161 mg/L. Solubilities and octanol-water partition coefficients seem to be the principal driving force in understanding safener mobilities. This paper provides an up-to-date literature review regarding the occurrence, behaviour, and toxic potency of herbicide safeners and identifies important knowledge gaps in our understanding of these compounds and the potential risks posed to potentially impacted ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"258 ","pages":"27-53"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2021_70","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Safeners are a group of chemicals applied with herbicides to protect crop plants from potential adverse effects of agricultural products used to kill weeds in monocotyledonous crops. Various routes of dissipation of safeners from their point of applications were evaluated. Despite the large numbers of safeners (over 18) commercially available and the relatively large quantities (~2 × 106 kg/year) used, there is little information on their mobility and fate in the environment and occurrence in various environmental matrices. The only class of safeners for which a significant amount of information is available is dichloroacetamide safeners, which have been observed in some rivers in the USA at concentrations ranging from 42 to 190 ng/L. Given this gap in the literature, there is a clear need to determine the occurrence, fate, and bioavailability of other classes of safeners. Furthermore, since safeners are typically used in commercial formulations, it is useful to study them in relation to their corresponding herbicides. Common routes of dissipation for herbicides and applied safeners are surface run off (erosion), hydrolysis, photolysis, sorption, leaching, volatilization, and microbial degradation. Toxic potencies of safeners vary among organisms and safener compounds, ranging from as low as the LC50 for fish (Oncorhynchus mykiss) for isoxadifen-ethyl, which was 0.34 mg/L, to as high as the LC50 for Daphnia magna from dichlormid, which was 161 mg/L. Solubilities and octanol-water partition coefficients seem to be the principal driving force in understanding safener mobilities. This paper provides an up-to-date literature review regarding the occurrence, behaviour, and toxic potency of herbicide safeners and identifies important knowledge gaps in our understanding of these compounds and the potential risks posed to potentially impacted ecosystems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作物保护化学安全剂在水生环境中的耗散、宿命和毒性。
安全剂是与除草剂一起使用的一组化学物质,用于保护作物免受用于杀死单子叶作物杂草的农产品的潜在不利影响。从应用角度出发,对各种安全系数的耗散途径进行了评价。尽管市面上有大量的安全剂(超过18种),而且使用量也相对较大(~2 × 106公斤/年),但关于它们在环境中的迁移和命运以及在各种环境基质中的发生情况的信息却很少。唯一一类有大量信息的安全剂是二氯乙酰胺安全剂,在美国的一些河流中已观察到其浓度在42至190纳克/升之间。鉴于文献中的这一空白,显然需要确定其他类别的安全剂的发生、命运和生物利用度。此外,由于安全剂通常用于商业配方,因此研究它们与相应除草剂的关系是有用的。除草剂和应用的安全剂的常见耗散途径是表面流失(侵蚀)、水解、光解、吸附、浸出、挥发和微生物降解。安全剂的毒性因生物和安全剂化合物而异,异二苯乙酯对鱼(Oncorhynchus mykiss)的LC50低至0.34 mg/L,而二氯菊酯对大水蚤的LC50高达161 mg/L。溶解度和辛醇-水分配系数似乎是理解安全剂迁移率的主要驱动力。本文提供了关于除草剂安全剂的发生、行为和毒性的最新文献综述,并确定了我们对这些化合物的理解以及对潜在受影响的生态系统构成的潜在风险的重要知识空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology publishes reviews pertaining to the sources, transport, fate and effects of contaminants in the environment. The journal provides a place for the publication of critical reviews of the current knowledge and understanding of environmental sciences in order to provide insight into contaminant pathways, fate and behavior in environmental compartments and the possible consequences of their presence, with multidisciplinary contributions from the fields of analytical chemistry, biochemistry, biology, ecology, molecular and cellular biology (in an environmental context), and human, wildlife and environmental toxicology. •Standing on a 55+ year history of publishing environmental toxicology reviews •Now publishing in journal format boasting rigorous review and expanded editorial board •Publishing home for extensive environmental reviews dealing with sources, transport, fate and effect of contaminants •Through Springer Compact agreements, authors from participating institutions can publish Open Choice at no cost to the authors
期刊最新文献
Environmental Impact Assessment in the Entire Life Cycle of Lithium-Ion Batteries A Review of Life Cycle Assessment of Soil Remediation Technology: Method Applications and Technological Characteristics Advances in Microbe-Driven Ecological Restoration on Bauxite Residue Disposal Areas Green Agriculture: Nanoparticles as Tools to Mitigate Heavy Metal Toxicity Use of Additives in Composting Promotes Passivation and Reduction in Bioavailability of Heavy Metals (HMs) in Compost
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1