Association between Social Frailty and Sleep Quality among Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2021-04-01 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1298/ptr.E10085
Taiji Noguchi, Ippei Nojima, Tomoe Inoue-Hirakawa, Hideshi Sugiura
{"title":"Association between Social Frailty and Sleep Quality among Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Taiji Noguchi,&nbsp;Ippei Nojima,&nbsp;Tomoe Inoue-Hirakawa,&nbsp;Hideshi Sugiura","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined the association between social frailty and subjective sleep quality among community-dwelling adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study recruited Japanese adults over the age of 60 years from health check-ups held in a public townhall in a suburban area between 2018 and 2019. Social frailty was evaluated using five criteria (living alone, not visiting friends sometimes, going out less frequently than the last year, not feeling helpful to friends or family, and not talking to someone every day) and categorized into three groups: non-frailty, pre-frailty, and frailty. Sleep quality was assessed according to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) by giving participants a self-reported questionnaire. We performed multivariable linear regression analysis, denoting social frailty as an independent variable, and the global PSQI score as a dependent variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 300 older adults were analyzed, 51.0% of whom were female. The participants' mean age was 73.0 years (standard deviation = 5.8). Multivariable analysis revealed the notable association between social frailty and a high global PSQI score (compared with non-frailty, frailty: β = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.08 to 1.80, p = 0.033). Of the five determiners of social frailty, not talking with someone every day was especially associated with a high global PSQI score (β = 1.57, 95% CI = 0.49 to 2.66, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study suggests that social frailty is associated with poor sleep quality among community-dwelling older adults. Our findings indicate the importance of social frailty on sleep quality among older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"24 2","pages":"153-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419475/pdf/ptr-24-02-0153.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: We examined the association between social frailty and subjective sleep quality among community-dwelling adults.

Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited Japanese adults over the age of 60 years from health check-ups held in a public townhall in a suburban area between 2018 and 2019. Social frailty was evaluated using five criteria (living alone, not visiting friends sometimes, going out less frequently than the last year, not feeling helpful to friends or family, and not talking to someone every day) and categorized into three groups: non-frailty, pre-frailty, and frailty. Sleep quality was assessed according to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) by giving participants a self-reported questionnaire. We performed multivariable linear regression analysis, denoting social frailty as an independent variable, and the global PSQI score as a dependent variable.

Results: Data from 300 older adults were analyzed, 51.0% of whom were female. The participants' mean age was 73.0 years (standard deviation = 5.8). Multivariable analysis revealed the notable association between social frailty and a high global PSQI score (compared with non-frailty, frailty: β = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.08 to 1.80, p = 0.033). Of the five determiners of social frailty, not talking with someone every day was especially associated with a high global PSQI score (β = 1.57, 95% CI = 0.49 to 2.66, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: The present study suggests that social frailty is associated with poor sleep quality among community-dwelling older adults. Our findings indicate the importance of social frailty on sleep quality among older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区居住老年人社会脆弱与睡眠质量的关系:一项横断面研究。
目的:探讨社区居民的社会脆弱与主观睡眠质量之间的关系。方法:这项横断面研究招募了2018年至2019年期间在郊区一个公共市政厅进行健康检查的60岁以上的日本成年人。社会脆弱是用五个标准来评估的(独自生活,有时不拜访朋友,比去年更少外出,对朋友或家人没有帮助,每天不与某人交谈),并分为三组:非脆弱,脆弱前和脆弱。根据匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI),通过给参与者一份自我报告的问卷来评估睡眠质量。我们进行了多变量线性回归分析,将社会脆弱性作为自变量,将整体PSQI评分作为因变量。结果:分析了300名老年人的数据,其中51.0%为女性。参与者的平均年龄为73.0岁(标准差= 5.8)。多变量分析显示,社会脆弱与高整体PSQI评分之间存在显著关联(与非脆弱相比,脆弱:β = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.08至1.80,p = 0.033)。在社会脆弱的五个决定因素中,不每天与某人交谈与高整体PSQI评分特别相关(β = 1.57, 95% CI = 0.49至2.66,p = 0.005)。结论:目前的研究表明,在社区居住的老年人中,社会脆弱性与睡眠质量差有关。我们的研究结果表明,社会脆弱性对老年人睡眠质量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Decision Tree Analysis Model for Predicting Home Discharge in a Convalescent Ward: A Single Institution Study. Early Ambulation Following Lung Resection Surgery: Impact on Short-term Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer. Effects of Isometric Quadriceps Muscle Exercise with Visual and Auditory Feedback at 1 Year after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Family-centered Care for Children with Disabilities in Japan-the Origin and Future of the "Ryouiku". The Assessment and Response of Rehabilitation Professionals to Sudden Deterioration in Symptoms: An Analysis of the National Database in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1