Rapid diagnostic testing as an indicator of malaria prevalence in Rorya District, Tanzania.

MalariaWorld journal Pub Date : 2021-07-01 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01
Will R Geisen, Cheryl Bartone, Deborah Gerdes, Christopher Lewis
{"title":"Rapid diagnostic testing as an indicator of malaria prevalence in Rorya District, Tanzania.","authors":"Will R Geisen,&nbsp;Cheryl Bartone,&nbsp;Deborah Gerdes,&nbsp;Christopher Lewis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid Diagnostic Testing (RDT), a point-of-care, qualitative test for <i>Plasmodium</i> antigen, has been a catalyst in the diagnosis of patients in malaria-endemic regions. While blood-smear microscopy remains the gold standard, RDT allows for swift diagnosis in resource-poor settings. Our study sought to utilize RDT to quantify local malaria prevalence in the Rorya district of Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two field clinics were established and 1,032 patients were screened. Those that described malaria symptoms were tested via RDT. The percentage of positive tests was compared to national data from the World Health Organization's 2019 World Malaria report and the President's Malaria Initiative Report for Tanzania. Intake data (sex, age, heart rate (HR), and temperature) were compared between the malaria-positive and malaria-negative groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>772 patients received RDT of whom 487 tested positive. There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of positive patients between the two sites (52.0% vs 38.2%). Sixty percent of malaria-positives were female and the median age of this group was 10 yrs (range 5-15 yrs). Intake data showed a notable difference in median heart rates between malaria-positive and malaria-negative persons, 84.0 (72-100) and 72.0 (74-84) beats per minute (bpm), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of malaria in Rorya was significantly higher than the reported Tanzanian average. Additionally, children were at a statistically higher risk of contracting malaria. Our data indicates that RDT offers enhanced insight into the local malarial burden that may be valuable to (governmental) health providers for the disbursement of resources in malaria-endemic regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74100,"journal":{"name":"MalariaWorld journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MalariaWorld journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rapid Diagnostic Testing (RDT), a point-of-care, qualitative test for Plasmodium antigen, has been a catalyst in the diagnosis of patients in malaria-endemic regions. While blood-smear microscopy remains the gold standard, RDT allows for swift diagnosis in resource-poor settings. Our study sought to utilize RDT to quantify local malaria prevalence in the Rorya district of Tanzania.

Materials and methods: Two field clinics were established and 1,032 patients were screened. Those that described malaria symptoms were tested via RDT. The percentage of positive tests was compared to national data from the World Health Organization's 2019 World Malaria report and the President's Malaria Initiative Report for Tanzania. Intake data (sex, age, heart rate (HR), and temperature) were compared between the malaria-positive and malaria-negative groups.

Results: 772 patients received RDT of whom 487 tested positive. There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of positive patients between the two sites (52.0% vs 38.2%). Sixty percent of malaria-positives were female and the median age of this group was 10 yrs (range 5-15 yrs). Intake data showed a notable difference in median heart rates between malaria-positive and malaria-negative persons, 84.0 (72-100) and 72.0 (74-84) beats per minute (bpm), respectively.

Conclusions: The prevalence of malaria in Rorya was significantly higher than the reported Tanzanian average. Additionally, children were at a statistically higher risk of contracting malaria. Our data indicates that RDT offers enhanced insight into the local malarial burden that may be valuable to (governmental) health providers for the disbursement of resources in malaria-endemic regions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速诊断检测作为坦桑尼亚罗亚地区疟疾流行的一项指标。
背景:快速诊断检测(RDT)是一种针对疟原虫抗原的即时定性检测方法,已成为疟疾流行地区诊断患者的催化剂。虽然血液涂片镜检仍然是金标准,但RDT可以在资源贫乏的环境中进行快速诊断。我们的研究试图利用RDT来量化坦桑尼亚罗亚地区的当地疟疾流行情况。材料与方法:建立2个野外诊所,筛选1032例患者。那些描述疟疾症状的人通过RDT进行了检测。将阳性检测百分比与世界卫生组织2019年世界疟疾报告和坦桑尼亚总统疟疾倡议报告中的国家数据进行了比较。将疟疾阳性组和疟疾阴性组的摄入数据(性别、年龄、心率和体温)进行比较。结果:772例患者接受RDT治疗,其中阳性487例。两个地点的阳性患者比例差异有统计学意义(52.0% vs 38.2%)。60%的疟疾阳性者为女性,这一群体的中位年龄为10岁(范围5-15岁)。摄入数据显示,疟疾阳性和疟疾阴性人群的中位心率差异显著,分别为每分钟84.0次(72-100次)和72.0次(74-84次)。结论:罗亚的疟疾流行率明显高于坦桑尼亚报告的平均水平。此外,从统计数据来看,儿童感染疟疾的风险更高。我们的数据表明,RDT提供了对当地疟疾负担的更深入了解,这可能对(政府)卫生提供者在疟疾流行地区分配资源有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biochemical features of the Cry4B toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and its interaction with BT-R3, a bitopic cadherin G-protein coupled receptor in Anopheles gambiae. Relapsing Plasmodium vivax malaria in a 12-year-old Brazilian girl: A case report. Uneasy bedfellows: Public-Private partnerships for malaria control. Palestine 100 years ago seen through the malaria lens: an examination of successful malaria elimination, and of where the malaria community seems to have taken a wrong turning Regaining the path to malaria elimination: Lessons from the pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1