Assessment and Clinical Decision-Making During Imminent Death in Hospice Music Therapy.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Music Therapy Pub Date : 2022-03-21 DOI:10.1093/jmt/thab016
Erin Fox, Alexa Economos, Noah Potvin
{"title":"Assessment and Clinical Decision-Making During Imminent Death in Hospice Music Therapy.","authors":"Erin Fox,&nbsp;Alexa Economos,&nbsp;Noah Potvin","doi":"10.1093/jmt/thab016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessment is a critical aspect of treatment planning, and while there exist standards for facilitating music therapy assessments in a variety of clinical settings, no such standards exist for music therapists in hospice and palliative care. This gap in knowledge, which limits music therapists' ability to provide patients and caregivers best practices promoting supported movement through the dying process, becomes particularly problematic when assessing patients who are imminently dying with a 24-72 hour prognosis. To further develop and define assessment and clinical decision-making processes used by music therapists in hospice and palliative care, the authors used a constructivist grounded theory and situational analysis methodology to analyze interviews of 15 hospice music therapists. The resulting theoretical model describes an ongoing process of assessment and clinical decision-making shaped by participants' individual epistemologies. Epistemologies were comprised of 5 ways of knowing, which were termed experiential, personal, musical, ethical, and integral, and provided participants critical foundations for their practice. The results support a development of a model for reflective practice as well as continued research on epistemological foundations of clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thab016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Assessment is a critical aspect of treatment planning, and while there exist standards for facilitating music therapy assessments in a variety of clinical settings, no such standards exist for music therapists in hospice and palliative care. This gap in knowledge, which limits music therapists' ability to provide patients and caregivers best practices promoting supported movement through the dying process, becomes particularly problematic when assessing patients who are imminently dying with a 24-72 hour prognosis. To further develop and define assessment and clinical decision-making processes used by music therapists in hospice and palliative care, the authors used a constructivist grounded theory and situational analysis methodology to analyze interviews of 15 hospice music therapists. The resulting theoretical model describes an ongoing process of assessment and clinical decision-making shaped by participants' individual epistemologies. Epistemologies were comprised of 5 ways of knowing, which were termed experiential, personal, musical, ethical, and integral, and provided participants critical foundations for their practice. The results support a development of a model for reflective practice as well as continued research on epistemological foundations of clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临终关怀音乐治疗中濒死期之评估与临床决策。
评估是治疗计划的一个关键方面,虽然在各种临床环境中存在促进音乐治疗评估的标准,但临终关怀和姑息治疗中的音乐治疗师没有这样的标准。这种知识上的差距限制了音乐治疗师在临终过程中为患者和护理人员提供促进支持运动的最佳实践的能力,在评估24-72小时预后即将死亡的患者时,这种差距变得尤其有问题。为了进一步发展和定义音乐治疗师在安宁疗护和缓和疗护中使用的评估和临床决策过程,作者使用建构主义理论和情境分析方法来分析15位安宁疗护音乐治疗师的访谈。由此产生的理论模型描述了由参与者的个人认识论塑造的评估和临床决策的持续过程。认识论由五种认识方式组成,分别是经验的、个人的、音乐的、伦理的和整体的,为参与者的实践提供了关键的基础。研究结果支持了反思性实践模型的发展,以及对临床实践认识论基础的持续研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Music Therapy
Journal of Music Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Developing Music Therapy in Maternity Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study Scoping Review of Music Interventions Aimed at Improving Reading Skills in Children with Specific Learning Disorders in Reading. Telehealth Engaged Music for Pain Outcomes: A Music and Imagery Proof-of-concept Study with Veterans. Professional Development and Learning Through the Research Process. Music Therapists´ Job Satisfaction and Related Factors: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Five European Countries and Israel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1