Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial (SCAR trial).

IF 1.1 Q3 SURGERY International Journal of Surgery Protocols Pub Date : 2021-08-30 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.29337/ijsp.159
Sung Il Kang, In Teak Woo, Sung Uk Bae, Chun-Seok Yang
{"title":"Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial (SCAR trial).","authors":"Sung Il Kang,&nbsp;In Teak Woo,&nbsp;Sung Uk Bae,&nbsp;Chun-Seok Yang","doi":"10.29337/ijsp.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) was introduced decades ago, it is still considered a difficult technique to perform compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA). In addition, controversy about the benefits of SILA compared to CLA abound and no definite criteria for choosing SILA over CLA in patients with appendicitis currently exist. Therefore, we have planned a multi-center randomized controlled trial to compare SILA with CLA in terms of cosmetic satisfaction and pain reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Patients diagnosed with appendicitis at the participating centers will be recruited and allocated into either a CLA or an SILA groups using a 1:1 randomization. Patients in the CLA group will receive a conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy and patients in the SILA group will receive a laparoscopic appendectomy using a single-incision at the umbilicus. The primary trial endpoint is cosmetic satisfaction assessed using the Patients and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) administered 6 weeks post-surgery. Secondary trial endpoints include cosmetic satisfaction assessed via the Body Image Questionnaire, pain levels assessed via the Visual Analog Scale and International Pain Outcomes questionnaire, and the presence of postoperative complications. The target sample size of this superiority trial is 120 patients, as this will provide 80% power at the 2.5% level of significance to detect a 3-point difference in POSAS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of this planned multi-center randomized controlled trial will provide substantive evidence to help surgeons choose when to use SILA over CLA in patients with appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This trial was approved by the institutional review board at Daegu joint on February 27, 2020 (No: 19-12-001-001) and registered with the clinical research information service (CRIS) (KCT0005048). The results of the study will be published and presented at appropriate conferences.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>To investigate the clinical benefits comparing between single incision laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendectomyTo assess the pain and cosmetic satisfaction through quantitative scales, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs), International Pain Outcome (IPO) Questionnaire, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and the Body Image Questionnaire (BIQ)To help surgeons choose when to use single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with appendicitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":42077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415183/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Although single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) was introduced decades ago, it is still considered a difficult technique to perform compared to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA). In addition, controversy about the benefits of SILA compared to CLA abound and no definite criteria for choosing SILA over CLA in patients with appendicitis currently exist. Therefore, we have planned a multi-center randomized controlled trial to compare SILA with CLA in terms of cosmetic satisfaction and pain reduction.

Methods and analysis: Patients diagnosed with appendicitis at the participating centers will be recruited and allocated into either a CLA or an SILA groups using a 1:1 randomization. Patients in the CLA group will receive a conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy and patients in the SILA group will receive a laparoscopic appendectomy using a single-incision at the umbilicus. The primary trial endpoint is cosmetic satisfaction assessed using the Patients and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) administered 6 weeks post-surgery. Secondary trial endpoints include cosmetic satisfaction assessed via the Body Image Questionnaire, pain levels assessed via the Visual Analog Scale and International Pain Outcomes questionnaire, and the presence of postoperative complications. The target sample size of this superiority trial is 120 patients, as this will provide 80% power at the 2.5% level of significance to detect a 3-point difference in POSAS.

Discussion: The results of this planned multi-center randomized controlled trial will provide substantive evidence to help surgeons choose when to use SILA over CLA in patients with appendicitis.

Ethics and dissemination: This trial was approved by the institutional review board at Daegu joint on February 27, 2020 (No: 19-12-001-001) and registered with the clinical research information service (CRIS) (KCT0005048). The results of the study will be published and presented at appropriate conferences.

Highlights: To investigate the clinical benefits comparing between single incision laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendectomyTo assess the pain and cosmetic satisfaction through quantitative scales, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs), International Pain Outcome (IPO) Questionnaire, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and the Body Image Questionnaire (BIQ)To help surgeons choose when to use single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with appendicitis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单切口与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术:多中心随机对照试验(SCAR试验)。
虽然单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)在几十年前就被引入,但与传统的腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)相比,它仍然被认为是一项难以实施的技术。此外,对于SILA与CLA相比的益处存在争议,目前阑尾炎患者选择SILA与CLA的明确标准尚不存在。因此,我们计划了一项多中心随机对照试验,比较SILA与CLA在美容满意度和疼痛减轻方面的差异。方法和分析:在参与中心诊断为阑尾炎的患者将被招募并按1:1随机分配到CLA组或SILA组。CLA组患者将接受传统的三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术,而SILA组患者将接受脐单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术。主要试验终点是术后6周使用患者和观察员疤痕评估量表(POSAS)评估美容满意度。次要试验终点包括通过身体形象问卷评估的美容满意度,通过视觉模拟量表和国际疼痛结局问卷评估的疼痛水平,以及术后并发症的存在。该优势试验的目标样本量为120例患者,因为这将在2.5%的显著性水平上提供80%的能力来检测POSAS的3点差异。讨论:这项计划中的多中心随机对照试验的结果将提供实质性证据,帮助外科医生选择何时在阑尾炎患者中使用SILA而不是CLA。伦理与传播:该试验于2020年2月27日在大邱联合机构审查委员会获得批准(No: 19-12-001-001),并在临床研究信息服务(CRIS)注册(KCT0005048)。这项研究的结果将在适当的会议上发表和提出。亮点:目的探讨单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术与常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床疗效比较。通过定量量表、患者报告结局量表(PROMs)、国际疼痛结局问卷(IPO)、患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)、身体形象问卷(Body Image Questionnaire, BIQ)帮助外科医生选择阑尾炎患者单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术的时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: IJS Protocols is the first peer-reviewed, international, open access journal seeking to publish research protocols across across the full breadth of the surgical field. We are aim to provide rapid submission to decision times whilst maintaining a high quality peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer: a prospective cohort study Research protocol for an observational health data analysis to assess the applicability of randomized controlled trials focusing on newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer using real-world data: PIONEER IMI’s “big data for better outcomes” program Prophylactic slowly resorbable mesh in midline laparotomy to limit incisional hernia incidence: the prospective ‘Mesh Augmented Reinforcement of Abdominal Wall Suture Line (MARS)’ cohort study protocol Challenges during implant-assisted prosthetic rehabilitation in fibula reconstructed jaws and its management: a scoping review protocol The association of breast surgery ASPIRE: breast pain pathway rapid evaluation project - study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1