Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 2: Rise of the American Medical Association.

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Chiropractic Education Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.7899/JCE-21-23
Claire D Johnson, Bart N Green
{"title":"Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 2: Rise of the American Medical Association.","authors":"Claire D Johnson, Bart N Green","doi":"10.7899/JCE-21-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper is the second in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated anti-trust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of how the AMA rose to dominate health care in the United States, and within this social context, how the chiropractic profession fought to survive in the first half of the 20th century.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the second of the series that explores the growth of medicine and the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AMA's code of ethics established in 1847 continued to direct organized medicine's actions to exclude other health professions. During the early 1900s, the AMA established itself as \"regular medicine.\" They labeled other types of medicine and health care professions, such as chiropractic, as \"irregulars\" claiming that they were cultists and quacks. In addition to the rise in power of the AMA, a report written by Abraham Flexner helped to solidify the AMA's control over health care. Chiropractic as a profession was emerging and developing in practice, education, and science. The few resources available to chiropractors were used to defend their profession against attacks from organized medicine and to secure legislation to legalize the practice of chiropractic. After years of struggle, the last state in the US legalized chiropractic 79 years after the birth of the profession.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the first part of the 20th century, the AMA was amassing power as chiropractic was just emerging as a profession. Events such as publication of Flexner's report and development of the medical basic science laws helped to entrench the AMA's monopoly on health care. The health care environment shaped how chiropractic grew as a profession. Chiropractic practice, education, and science were challenged by trying to develop outside of the medical establishment. These events added to the tensions between the professions that ultimately resulted in the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.</p>","PeriodicalId":44516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8493523/pdf/i2374-250X-35-S1-25.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-21-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This paper is the second in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated anti-trust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of how the AMA rose to dominate health care in the United States, and within this social context, how the chiropractic profession fought to survive in the first half of the 20th century.

Methods: This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the second of the series that explores the growth of medicine and the chiropractic profession.

Results: The AMA's code of ethics established in 1847 continued to direct organized medicine's actions to exclude other health professions. During the early 1900s, the AMA established itself as "regular medicine." They labeled other types of medicine and health care professions, such as chiropractic, as "irregulars" claiming that they were cultists and quacks. In addition to the rise in power of the AMA, a report written by Abraham Flexner helped to solidify the AMA's control over health care. Chiropractic as a profession was emerging and developing in practice, education, and science. The few resources available to chiropractors were used to defend their profession against attacks from organized medicine and to secure legislation to legalize the practice of chiropractic. After years of struggle, the last state in the US legalized chiropractic 79 years after the birth of the profession.

Conclusion: In the first part of the 20th century, the AMA was amassing power as chiropractic was just emerging as a profession. Events such as publication of Flexner's report and development of the medical basic science laws helped to entrench the AMA's monopoly on health care. The health care environment shaped how chiropractic grew as a profession. Chiropractic practice, education, and science were challenged by trying to develop outside of the medical establishment. These events added to the tensions between the professions that ultimately resulted in the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾改变脊骨神经科学行业的诉讼案第二部分:美国医学协会的崛起。
目的:本文是 "威尔克诉美国医学会(AMA)"系列文章的第二篇,该系列文章探讨了与 "威尔克诉美国医学会(AMA)"诉讼案相关的历史事件,在该诉讼案中,原告认为美国医学会、美国医院协会和其他医学专业协会限制脊骨神经科医生的商业行为,违反了反垄断法。本文旨在简要回顾美国医学会是如何崛起并主导美国医疗保健行业的历史,以及在这一社会背景下,脊骨神经科学行业是如何在20世纪上半叶为生存而奋斗的:本历史研究采用现象学方法,对脊骨神经医学现代化时期常规医学与脊骨神经医学之间的冲突以及法律纠纷前后的事件进行定性调查。我们的研究方法包括获取原始数据和二手数据。最后的叙述性复述按照时间顺序发展成 8 篇论文。本文是该系列的第二篇论文,探讨了医学和脊骨神经科学专业的发展:结果:美国医学会于1847年制定的道德准则继续指导着有组织的医学行动,将其他医疗行业排除在外。20 世纪初,美国医学会将自己定位为 "正规医学"。他们将脊骨神经科等其他类型的医学和保健专业称为 "非正规",声称它们是邪教和庸医。除了美国医学会权力的崛起,亚伯拉罕-弗莱克斯纳(Abraham Flexner)撰写的一份报告也巩固了美国医学会对医疗保健的控制。脊骨神经科作为一个新兴行业,在实践、教育和科学方面都在不断发展。脊骨神经科医生利用为数不多的资源捍卫自己的职业,抵御来自有组织医学的攻击,并争取立法使脊骨神经科执业合法化。经过多年的斗争,在脊骨神经科学诞生79年后,美国最后一个州实现了脊骨神经科学的合法化:结论:20世纪上半叶,脊骨神经医学刚刚兴起时,美国医学会的势力正在不断壮大。弗莱克斯纳报告的发表和医学基础科学法的制定等事件有助于巩固美国医学会在医疗保健领域的垄断地位。当时的医疗环境决定了脊骨神经科学的发展。脊骨神经科学的实践、教育和科学都因试图在医疗机构之外发展而受到挑战。这些事件加剧了行业间的紧张关系,最终导致了威尔克诉美国医学会的诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Education
Journal of Chiropractic Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
37.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chiropractic Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing research and scholarly articles pertaining to education theory, pedagogy, methodologies, practice, and other content relevant to the health professions academe. Journal contents are of interest to teachers, researchers, clinical educators, administrators, and students.
期刊最新文献
Patient satisfaction with clinical services provided by chiropractic students under supervision compared to licensed chiropractors: An observational study. Development of a new examination for the Canadian Chiropractic Examining Board. Improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in chiropractic education and profession: Report from three 2020-2021 summit meetings. Compliance with evidence-based radiographic imaging guidelines by chiropractic interns at a chiropractic training program. Comparison of mistakes on multiple-choice question and fill-in-the-blank examinations: A retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1