Posttraumatic stress following childbirth: psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the City Birth Trauma Scale.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-27 DOI:10.1080/0167482X.2021.1977278
Flavia de Lima Osório, Ana Carolina Rossini Darwin, Eduardo Antonio Bombonetti, Susan Ayers
{"title":"Posttraumatic stress following childbirth: psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the City Birth Trauma Scale.","authors":"Flavia de Lima Osório,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Rossini Darwin,&nbsp;Eduardo Antonio Bombonetti,&nbsp;Susan Ayers","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2021.1977278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To seek validity and reliability evidence of the Brazilian version of the City Birth Trauma Scale (BiTS-Br) and establish diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 343 mothers (up to one year after childbirth, 30.8<b> </b>years old on average) completed the BiTs-Br and other instruments screening for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety for convergent validity analysis. Structural validity was verified using exploratory techniques (principal components analysis), while discriminant validity was checked using the known-groups method and ROC curve. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 was applied <i>via</i> telephone interviews. Test-retest reliability was obtained in a 15-30-d interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-factor structure was found (birth-related and general symptoms), with excellent test-retest reliability (0.73) and internal consistency (0.91). Moderate/strong associations (>0.62) were found with correlated symptoms and posttraumatic stress. The scale had a diagnostic accuracy of 86.7% and a cutoff point >28 was the most appropriate, with a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 83%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BiTS-Br presented excellent psychometric indexes, similar to the original version and other cross-culturally adapted versions. Thus, it can be widely used in scientific research and clinical settings to support the identification and treatment of PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2021.1977278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: To seek validity and reliability evidence of the Brazilian version of the City Birth Trauma Scale (BiTS-Br) and establish diagnostic accuracy.

Method: A total of 343 mothers (up to one year after childbirth, 30.8years old on average) completed the BiTs-Br and other instruments screening for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety for convergent validity analysis. Structural validity was verified using exploratory techniques (principal components analysis), while discriminant validity was checked using the known-groups method and ROC curve. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 was applied via telephone interviews. Test-retest reliability was obtained in a 15-30-d interval.

Results: A two-factor structure was found (birth-related and general symptoms), with excellent test-retest reliability (0.73) and internal consistency (0.91). Moderate/strong associations (>0.62) were found with correlated symptoms and posttraumatic stress. The scale had a diagnostic accuracy of 86.7% and a cutoff point >28 was the most appropriate, with a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 83%.

Conclusions: BiTS-Br presented excellent psychometric indexes, similar to the original version and other cross-culturally adapted versions. Thus, it can be widely used in scientific research and clinical settings to support the identification and treatment of PTSD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分娩后的创伤后压力:巴西版城市出生创伤量表的心理测量特性。
目的:寻求巴西版城市出生创伤量表(BiTS-Br)的效度和信度证据,建立诊断的准确性。方法:对343名产妇(分娩后1年内,平均年龄30.8岁)进行创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、抑郁、焦虑等心理指标的bit - br及其他量表筛查,进行收敛效度分析。结构效度采用探索性技术(主成分分析)验证,判别效度采用已知组法和ROC曲线检验。DSM-5的结构化临床访谈采用电话访谈方式。在15-30 d的间隔内获得重测信度。结果:发现双因素结构(出生相关症状和一般症状),具有良好的重测信度(0.73)和内部一致性(0.91)。中度/强相关性(>0.62)与相关症状和创伤后应激相关。该量表诊断准确率为86.7%,截断点>28为最佳,敏感性72%,特异性83%。结论:BiTS-Br具有与原版及其他跨文化改编版本相似的优秀心理测量指标。因此,它可以广泛应用于科学研究和临床环境,以支持PTSD的识别和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology was founded in 1982 in order to provide a scientific forum for obstetricians, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists, academic health professionals as well as for all those who are interested in the psychosocial and psychosomatic aspects of women’s health. Another of its aims is to stimulate obstetricians and gynecologists to pay more attention to this very important facet of their profession.
期刊最新文献
Retracted article: The effects of fish oil omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on mental health parameters and metabolic status of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Effect of social support on fetal movement self-monitoring behavior in Chinese women: a moderated mediation model of health beliefs. The role and outcomes of music therapy during pregnancy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Assessment of factors related to poly cystic ovarian syndrome - A comparative and correlational study. Investigating socioeconomic disparities of Kangaroo mother care on preterm infant health outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1