[Partial visual rehabilitation 5 and 6 years after a Gundersen total conjunctival flap procedure].

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Ophthalmologe Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s00347-021-01503-4
Y Abu Dail, L Daas, F A Flockerzi, B Seitz
{"title":"[Partial visual rehabilitation 5 and 6 years after a Gundersen total conjunctival flap procedure].","authors":"Y Abu Dail,&nbsp;L Daas,&nbsp;F A Flockerzi,&nbsp;B Seitz","doi":"10.1007/s00347-021-01503-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We present the results of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) after previous treatment with a total conjunctival flap in two patients.</p><p><strong>Case reports: </strong>Patient 1, a 66-year-old with a history of bilateral cement chemical burn in 1986 and external right-sided limbokeratoplasty in 2008 was treated externally with a total conjunctival flap in the right eye in 2014 due to a persistent corneal ulcer with imminent perforation. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the right eye was light sensation, intraocular pressure on palpation was within normal range. Clinically, total conjunctival flap was present. Patient 2 was treated externally in May 2015 due to acanthamoeba keratitis in the left eye with a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). A re-DALK was also performed externally in the same month. A third DALK was performed externally in August 2015 due to a persistent corneal ulcer, followed by a total conjunctival flap 2 weeks later. BCVA of the left eye was light sensation and intraocular pressure on palpation was within the normal range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient 1 was treated with removal of the conjunctival flap in the right eye and penetrating central re-keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 8.5/8.75 mm). Simultaneously, lens extraction and intraocular lens implantation were performed (as a triple procedure). Additionally, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were performed. BCVA 6 months postoperatively was 0.1. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection. Patient 2 was treated on the left eye with removal of the conjunctival flap and a penetrating central keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 7.0/7.5 mm). An AMT as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were simultaneously performed. Cataract surgery was performed 3 months postoperatively and BCVA of the right eye was 0.1 thereafter. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conjunctival flap is a treatment of last resort of the (almost) penetrated corneal ulcer, which is to be used only when a keratoplasty is technically impossible. Provided the eye structure and retinal function are preserved, partial visual rehabilitation can possibly be achieved through a PKP after excision of the conjunctival flap, even years after corneal blindness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54676,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologe","volume":"119 2","pages":"203-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologe","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01503-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: We present the results of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) after previous treatment with a total conjunctival flap in two patients.

Case reports: Patient 1, a 66-year-old with a history of bilateral cement chemical burn in 1986 and external right-sided limbokeratoplasty in 2008 was treated externally with a total conjunctival flap in the right eye in 2014 due to a persistent corneal ulcer with imminent perforation. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the right eye was light sensation, intraocular pressure on palpation was within normal range. Clinically, total conjunctival flap was present. Patient 2 was treated externally in May 2015 due to acanthamoeba keratitis in the left eye with a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). A re-DALK was also performed externally in the same month. A third DALK was performed externally in August 2015 due to a persistent corneal ulcer, followed by a total conjunctival flap 2 weeks later. BCVA of the left eye was light sensation and intraocular pressure on palpation was within the normal range.

Results: Patient 1 was treated with removal of the conjunctival flap in the right eye and penetrating central re-keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 8.5/8.75 mm). Simultaneously, lens extraction and intraocular lens implantation were performed (as a triple procedure). Additionally, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were performed. BCVA 6 months postoperatively was 0.1. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection. Patient 2 was treated on the left eye with removal of the conjunctival flap and a penetrating central keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 7.0/7.5 mm). An AMT as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were simultaneously performed. Cataract surgery was performed 3 months postoperatively and BCVA of the right eye was 0.1 thereafter. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection.

Conclusion: The conjunctival flap is a treatment of last resort of the (almost) penetrated corneal ulcer, which is to be used only when a keratoplasty is technically impossible. Provided the eye structure and retinal function are preserved, partial visual rehabilitation can possibly be achieved through a PKP after excision of the conjunctival flap, even years after corneal blindness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Gundersen全结膜瓣术后5、6年的部分视力恢复]。
背景:我们报告了两例患者在先前用全结膜瓣治疗后进行穿透性角膜移植术(PKP)的结果。病例报告:患者1,66岁,1986年有双侧水泥化学烧伤史,2008年有右外侧边缘角膜移植术,2014年因持续性角膜溃疡伴即刻穿孔右眼行全结膜瓣外置治疗。右眼最佳矫正视力(BCVA)为光感,触诊眼压正常。临床表现为全结膜瓣。患者2因左眼棘阿米巴角膜炎于2015年5月行深度前板层角膜移植术(deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, DALK)。同月还在外部进行了re-DALK。由于持续性角膜溃疡,2015年8月进行了第三次体外DALK手术,两周后进行了全结膜瓣手术。左眼BCVA轻感,触诊眼压正常。结果:患者1行右眼结膜瓣摘除及穿透性中央角膜移植术(手持式Barron环钻;接枝直径8.5/8.75 mm)。同时行晶状体摘除和人工晶状体植入术(三联手术)。此外,还进行了羊膜移植(AMT)作为补片和颞外侧修复术。术后6个月BCVA为0.1。移植的器官很清晰,没有任何排斥反应。患者2在左眼接受了结膜瓣切除和穿透性中央角膜移植术(手持式Barron环钻;接枝直径7.0/7.5 mm)。同时行AMT补片和颞外侧修复术。术后3个月行白内障手术,术后右眼BCVA为0.1。移植的器官很清晰,没有任何排斥反应。结论:结膜瓣是治疗(几乎)穿透性角膜溃疡的最后手段,只有在角膜移植术技术上不可行时才可使用。在保留眼结构和视网膜功能的前提下,在结膜瓣切除后,甚至在角膜失明数年后,可以通过PKP实现部分视力恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmologe
Ophthalmologe 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Ophthalmologe is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of ophthalmology. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of ophthalmologists. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Mediated Optic Neuritis Following COVID-19 Vaccination. [Acute unilateral impaired vision after COVID vaccination]. [Epidemiology and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. The Hannover data in the Retina.net ROP registry from 2001-2017]. [Displacement of a STARflo glaucoma drainage implant with accompanying complications]. [Complete visual recovery after Nd:YAG laser polishing of the anterior surface of the intraocular lens].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1