Exploring the feasibility of the Magnet Hospital concept within a European university nursing department: a mixed-methods study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Contemporary Nurse Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-12 DOI:10.1080/10376178.2021.1987939
Méryl Paquay, Jean-Marie Boulanger, Médéa Locquet, Nadège Dubois, Alexandre Ghuysen
{"title":"Exploring the feasibility of the Magnet Hospital concept within a European university nursing department: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Méryl Paquay,&nbsp;Jean-Marie Boulanger,&nbsp;Médéa Locquet,&nbsp;Nadège Dubois,&nbsp;Alexandre Ghuysen","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2021.1987939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human resource management in hospitals has become increasingly challenging. Nursing staff are a major asset in achieving the quality and safety objectives of health care institutions. The concept of Magnet Hospitals seeks to promote a positive work environment. Despite knowledge of the Magnet Hospital concept, the reasons for the lack of applying the concept within Belgian nursing departments is matter for debate.</p><p><strong>Objectives/ aims/ hypotheses: </strong>The aim was to explore whether Magnet Hospital principles and values were applicable to a nursing department within a Belgian University Hospital Centre.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed methods approach involving both qualitative and quantitative methodology was adopted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected across two sites of a University Hospital. For the quantitative phase, a magnetism measurement questionnaire was administered to a convenience sample of nurses from both sites using email and the hospital intranet. For the qualitative phase, a convenience sample of head nurses from across the two sites were recruited by email and agreed to attend interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the quantitative phase, scores obtained show a limited magnetism among the nurses (<i>n</i> = 224). Out of the 18 sub-dimensions, seven appear to be underdeveloped (score <50) compared to two developed (score> 75). The qualitative phase showed nine facilitators, nine barriers, and seven neutral constructs among surveyed head nurses (<i>n</i> = 17). These demonstrate a marked interest in the concept, but constraints put forward imply that establishment of the concept would be premature or at least quite difficult within the institution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite interest toward the concept, the implementation of Magnet Hospital within nursing departments currently seems difficult. However, these results shed light upon managerial, organisational, and scientific issues involved in using the concept of the Magnet Hospital within European hospitals.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>Communication, unit management strategy and transition of human resource management, through a more human and less administrative approach, are essential for Magnet Hospital implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55633,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Nurse","volume":"57 3-4","pages":"187-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1987939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Human resource management in hospitals has become increasingly challenging. Nursing staff are a major asset in achieving the quality and safety objectives of health care institutions. The concept of Magnet Hospitals seeks to promote a positive work environment. Despite knowledge of the Magnet Hospital concept, the reasons for the lack of applying the concept within Belgian nursing departments is matter for debate.

Objectives/ aims/ hypotheses: The aim was to explore whether Magnet Hospital principles and values were applicable to a nursing department within a Belgian University Hospital Centre.

Design: A mixed methods approach involving both qualitative and quantitative methodology was adopted.

Methods: Data were collected across two sites of a University Hospital. For the quantitative phase, a magnetism measurement questionnaire was administered to a convenience sample of nurses from both sites using email and the hospital intranet. For the qualitative phase, a convenience sample of head nurses from across the two sites were recruited by email and agreed to attend interviews.

Results: For the quantitative phase, scores obtained show a limited magnetism among the nurses (n = 224). Out of the 18 sub-dimensions, seven appear to be underdeveloped (score <50) compared to two developed (score> 75). The qualitative phase showed nine facilitators, nine barriers, and seven neutral constructs among surveyed head nurses (n = 17). These demonstrate a marked interest in the concept, but constraints put forward imply that establishment of the concept would be premature or at least quite difficult within the institution.

Conclusions: Despite interest toward the concept, the implementation of Magnet Hospital within nursing departments currently seems difficult. However, these results shed light upon managerial, organisational, and scientific issues involved in using the concept of the Magnet Hospital within European hospitals.

Impact statement: Communication, unit management strategy and transition of human resource management, through a more human and less administrative approach, are essential for Magnet Hospital implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索磁铁医院概念在欧洲大学护理部门的可行性:一项混合方法研究。
背景:医院人力资源管理面临的挑战越来越大。护理人员是实现保健机构质量和安全目标的重要资产。磁铁医院的概念旨在促进积极的工作环境。尽管知道磁石医院的概念,但比利时护理部门缺乏应用这一概念的原因是有争议的。目的/目的/假设:目的是探讨磁石医院的原则和价值观是否适用于比利时大学医院中心的护理部门。设计:采用定性和定量相结合的方法。方法:收集某大学附属医院两所医院的资料。在定量阶段,通过电子邮件和医院内部网对两个站点的护士进行磁力测量问卷调查。在定性阶段,通过电子邮件从两个地点的护士长中招募了一个方便的样本,并同意参加面试。结果:在定量阶段,获得的评分在护士中显示出有限的吸引力(n = 224)。在18个子维度中,有7个维度似乎不发达(75分)。在定性阶段,被调查的护士长共有9个促进因素、9个障碍因素和7个中性因素(n = 17)。这些国家对这一概念表现出明显的兴趣,但提出的限制意味着在机构内确立这一概念为时过早,或至少相当困难。结论:尽管人们对磁石医院的概念感兴趣,但目前在护理部门实施磁石医院似乎很困难。然而,这些结果揭示了在欧洲医院中使用磁铁医院概念所涉及的管理、组织和科学问题。影响说明:沟通、单位管理战略和人力资源管理转型,通过更人性化、更少行政化的方式,对磁石医院的实施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Nurse
Contemporary Nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Nurse is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to increase nursing skills, knowledge and communication, assist in professional development and to enhance educational standards by publishing stimulating, informative and useful articles on a range of issues influencing professional nursing research, teaching and practice. Contemporary Nurse is a forum for nursing educators, researchers and professionals who require high-quality, peer-reviewed research on emerging research fronts, perspectives and protocols, community and family health, cross-cultural research, recruitment, retention, education, training and practitioner perspectives. Contemporary Nurse publishes original research articles, reviews and discussion papers.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing job satisfaction among advanced nurse practitioners: insights and reflections from Taiwan Special Issue: Advances in Frailty Science Special Issue: Quality Improvement Developing nursing interventions in Paediatric Emergence Delirium: a scoping review Integrating technology in aged care: challenges, opportunities, and a nursing lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1