Physician Scientists Of Yesterday, Today And Tomorrow.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical and Investigative Medicine Pub Date : 2021-10-03 DOI:10.25011/cim.v44i3.36707
Ryan H Kirkpatrick, J Gordon Boyd
{"title":"Physician Scientists Of Yesterday, Today And Tomorrow.","authors":"Ryan H Kirkpatrick,&nbsp;J Gordon Boyd","doi":"10.25011/cim.v44i3.36707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the separate roles of physicians and scientists are well defined, the role of a physician scientist is broad and variable. In today’s society, physician scientists are seen as a hybrid between the two fields and they are, therefore, expected to be key to the translation of biomedical research into clinical care. This article offers a narrative review on physician scientists and endeavours to answer whether there is an ongoing need for physician scientists today. The historical role of physician scientists is discussed and compared with physician scientists of the 21st century. Fundamental differences and similarities between the separate roles of physicians and scientists are examined as well as the current state of bench to bedside research. Finally, the ability of 21st century physician scientists to impact their respective medical and scientific fields in comparison to non-physician scientists will be discussed. This paper speculates as to why numbers of physician scientists are dwindling and uses the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of rapid translational research. Ultimately, we suggest that physician scientists are important and may have the most impact on their field by working to connect bedside and bench rather than simply working separately in the bedside and bench. To do this, physician scientists may need to lead clinical research teams composed of individuals from diverse training backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":50683,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v44i3.36707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the separate roles of physicians and scientists are well defined, the role of a physician scientist is broad and variable. In today’s society, physician scientists are seen as a hybrid between the two fields and they are, therefore, expected to be key to the translation of biomedical research into clinical care. This article offers a narrative review on physician scientists and endeavours to answer whether there is an ongoing need for physician scientists today. The historical role of physician scientists is discussed and compared with physician scientists of the 21st century. Fundamental differences and similarities between the separate roles of physicians and scientists are examined as well as the current state of bench to bedside research. Finally, the ability of 21st century physician scientists to impact their respective medical and scientific fields in comparison to non-physician scientists will be discussed. This paper speculates as to why numbers of physician scientists are dwindling and uses the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of rapid translational research. Ultimately, we suggest that physician scientists are important and may have the most impact on their field by working to connect bedside and bench rather than simply working separately in the bedside and bench. To do this, physician scientists may need to lead clinical research teams composed of individuals from diverse training backgrounds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
昨天,今天和明天的内科科学家。
虽然医生和科学家的独立角色是明确的,但医生科学家的角色是广泛而多变的。在当今社会,内科科学家被视为这两个领域的混合体,因此,他们被期望成为将生物医学研究转化为临床护理的关键。这篇文章提供了一个叙述性的回顾医师科学家和努力回答是否有一个持续的需要医师科学家今天。讨论了医学家的历史作用,并与21世纪的医学家进行了比较。医生和科学家的不同角色之间的基本差异和相似之处被检查,以及目前的状态从实验室到床边的研究。最后,与非医师科学家相比,21世纪医师科学家影响各自医学和科学领域的能力将被讨论。这篇论文推测了为什么医生科学家的数量正在减少,并以COVID-19大流行为例进行了快速转化研究。最终,我们认为内科科学家是重要的,通过将床边和实验室联系起来,而不是简单地在床边和实验室分开工作,可能会对他们的领域产生最大的影响。要做到这一点,内科科学家可能需要领导由不同培训背景的个人组成的临床研究团队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Investigative Medicine
Clinical and Investigative Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Investigative Medicine (CIM), publishes original work in the field of Clinical Investigation. Original work includes clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical reports. Reviews include information for Continuing Medical Education (CME), narrative review articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Global Trends and Frontier in Research on Pancreatic Alpha Cells: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2013 to 2023. Recommendations for Recovery of the COVID-19 Pandemic-related Diagnostic, Screening, and Procedure Backlog in Ontario: A Survey of Healthcare Leaders. Spring 2024: Clinician Investigator Trainee Association of Canada (CITAC). Training Outcomes and Satisfaction in Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc Programs: Findings from a National Survey. A Discussion with Dr. Natasha Kekre, Hematologist and Clinician Scientist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1