Auxiliary controller design and performance comparative analysis in closed-loop brain-machine interface system.

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Biological Cybernetics Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-04 DOI:10.1007/s00422-021-00897-3
Hongguang Pan, Haoqian Song, Qi Zhang, Wenyu Mi, Jinggao Sun
{"title":"Auxiliary controller design and performance comparative analysis in closed-loop brain-machine interface system.","authors":"Hongguang Pan,&nbsp;Haoqian Song,&nbsp;Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Wenyu Mi,&nbsp;Jinggao Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00422-021-00897-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain-machine interface (BMI) can realize information interaction between the brain and external devices, and yet the control accuracy is limited by the change of electroencephalogram signals. The introduction of auxiliary controller can overcome the above problems, but the performance of different auxiliary controllers is quite different. Hence, in this paper, we comprehensively compare and analyze the performance of different auxiliary controllers to provide a theoretical basis for designing BMI system. The main work includes: (1) designing four kinds of auxiliary controllers based on simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation-function approximator (SPSA-FA), iterative feedback tuning-PID (IFT-PID), model predictive control (MPC) and model-free control (MFC); (2) based on the model of improved single-joint information transmission, constructing the closed-loop BMI systems with the decoder-based Wiener filter; and (3) comparing their performance in the constructed closed-loop BMI systems for dynamic motion restoration. The results show that the order of tracking accuracy is MPC, IFT-PID, SPSA-FA, MFC, and the order of time consumed is opposite. A good control effectiveness is achieved at the expense of time, so a suitable auxiliary controller should be selected according to the actual requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":55374,"journal":{"name":"Biological Cybernetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-021-00897-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Brain-machine interface (BMI) can realize information interaction between the brain and external devices, and yet the control accuracy is limited by the change of electroencephalogram signals. The introduction of auxiliary controller can overcome the above problems, but the performance of different auxiliary controllers is quite different. Hence, in this paper, we comprehensively compare and analyze the performance of different auxiliary controllers to provide a theoretical basis for designing BMI system. The main work includes: (1) designing four kinds of auxiliary controllers based on simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation-function approximator (SPSA-FA), iterative feedback tuning-PID (IFT-PID), model predictive control (MPC) and model-free control (MFC); (2) based on the model of improved single-joint information transmission, constructing the closed-loop BMI systems with the decoder-based Wiener filter; and (3) comparing their performance in the constructed closed-loop BMI systems for dynamic motion restoration. The results show that the order of tracking accuracy is MPC, IFT-PID, SPSA-FA, MFC, and the order of time consumed is opposite. A good control effectiveness is achieved at the expense of time, so a suitable auxiliary controller should be selected according to the actual requirements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
闭环脑机接口系统中辅助控制器的设计与性能对比分析。
脑机接口(BMI)可以实现大脑与外部设备之间的信息交互,但其控制精度受脑电图信号变化的限制。辅助控制器的引入可以克服上述问题,但不同的辅助控制器性能差异较大。因此,本文全面比较分析了不同辅助控制器的性能,为BMI系统的设计提供理论依据。主要工作包括:(1)设计了基于同步摄动随机逼近函数逼近器(SPSA-FA)、迭代反馈整定pid (IFT-PID)、模型预测控制(MPC)和无模型控制(MFC)的四种辅助控制器;(2)基于改进的单关节信息传输模型,构建了基于解码器的维纳滤波器的闭环BMI系统;(3)比较它们在构建的闭环BMI系统中的动态运动恢复性能。结果表明:该方法的跟踪精度顺序为MPC、IFT-PID、SPSA-FA、MFC,所消耗的时间顺序相反。以牺牲时间为代价获得良好的控制效果,因此应根据实际要求选择合适的辅助控制器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Cybernetics
Biological Cybernetics 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Cybernetics is an interdisciplinary medium for theoretical and application-oriented aspects of information processing in organisms, including sensory, motor, cognitive, and ecological phenomena. Topics covered include: mathematical modeling of biological systems; computational, theoretical or engineering studies with relevance for understanding biological information processing; and artificial implementation of biological information processing and self-organizing principles. Under the main aspects of performance and function of systems, emphasis is laid on communication between life sciences and technical/theoretical disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Phase response curves and the role of coordinates. Neuroscientific insights about computer vision models: a concise review. Astrocyte-mediated neuronal irregularities and dynamics: the complexity of the tripartite synapse Can a Hebbian-like learning rule be avoiding the curse of dimensionality in sparse distributed data? Variational analysis of sensory feedback mechanisms in powerstroke-recovery systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1