Cardiovascular Safety and Hemostatic Efficacy of Topical Epinephrine in Children Receiving Zirconia Crowns.

Q3 Medicine Anesthesia progress Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.2344/anpr-68-02-05
Afsoon Fazeli, Travis M Nelson, Mir Sohail Fazeli, Yvonne S Lin, JoAnna Scott
{"title":"Cardiovascular Safety and Hemostatic Efficacy of Topical Epinephrine in Children Receiving Zirconia Crowns.","authors":"Afsoon Fazeli,&nbsp;Travis M Nelson,&nbsp;Mir Sohail Fazeli,&nbsp;Yvonne S Lin,&nbsp;JoAnna Scott","doi":"10.2344/anpr-68-02-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to determine the cardiovascular safety of topical racemic epinephrine pellets by measuring heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure in children receiving dental care under general anesthesia. The secondary aim was to assess clinical efficacy by measuring time to reach adequate hemostasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this pilot study utilizing a split-mouth randomized design, 13 patients requiring prefabricated zirconia crowns on both primary maxillary first molars were recruited. Patients received continuous infusions of propofol and remifentanil with 50-70% inhaled nitrous oxide and oxygen. After randomization and tooth preparation, either saline pellets (control) or racemic epinephrine pellets (experimental) were applied directly to gingival tissue. Vital signs were recorded for 5 minutes. The procedure was repeated on the contralateral side using the alternative (control or experimental) treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Topical racemic epinephrine compared to saline produced a significantly larger decrease in mean diastolic blood pressure (-11.1% vs -3.9%; P < .01) and mean arterial pressure (-8.1% vs -2.1%; P < .01), although all noted decreases in cardiovascular variables were clinically insignificant. All experimental treatment teeth achieved adequate hemostasis after 2.2 minutes. Only 5 of the 13 control treatment teeth achieved adequate hemostasis during the 5-minute observation period (1.6 vs 4.2 minutes; P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, we conclude that use of topical racemic epinephrine pellets did not result in adverse cardiovascular effects and hemostasis was reached more quickly and predictably compared to saline pellets.</p>","PeriodicalId":7818,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"68 3","pages":"133-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8500323/pdf/i0003-3006-68-3-133.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-68-02-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to determine the cardiovascular safety of topical racemic epinephrine pellets by measuring heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure in children receiving dental care under general anesthesia. The secondary aim was to assess clinical efficacy by measuring time to reach adequate hemostasis.

Methods: For this pilot study utilizing a split-mouth randomized design, 13 patients requiring prefabricated zirconia crowns on both primary maxillary first molars were recruited. Patients received continuous infusions of propofol and remifentanil with 50-70% inhaled nitrous oxide and oxygen. After randomization and tooth preparation, either saline pellets (control) or racemic epinephrine pellets (experimental) were applied directly to gingival tissue. Vital signs were recorded for 5 minutes. The procedure was repeated on the contralateral side using the alternative (control or experimental) treatment.

Results: Topical racemic epinephrine compared to saline produced a significantly larger decrease in mean diastolic blood pressure (-11.1% vs -3.9%; P < .01) and mean arterial pressure (-8.1% vs -2.1%; P < .01), although all noted decreases in cardiovascular variables were clinically insignificant. All experimental treatment teeth achieved adequate hemostasis after 2.2 minutes. Only 5 of the 13 control treatment teeth achieved adequate hemostasis during the 5-minute observation period (1.6 vs 4.2 minutes; P = .01).

Conclusion: Overall, we conclude that use of topical racemic epinephrine pellets did not result in adverse cardiovascular effects and hemostasis was reached more quickly and predictably compared to saline pellets.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用氧化锆冠的儿童外用肾上腺素的心血管安全性和止血效果。
目的:本研究的主要目的是通过测量在全身麻醉下接受牙科护理的儿童的心率、收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压来确定外用外消旋肾上腺素颗粒的心血管安全性。第二个目的是通过测量达到充分止血的时间来评估临床疗效。方法:本研究采用裂口随机设计,招募了13例需要在上颌第一磨牙上安装预制氧化锆冠的患者。患者连续输注异丙酚和瑞芬太尼,同时吸入50-70%的氧化亚氮和氧气。随机化和牙齿准备后,生理盐水微球(对照组)或外消旋肾上腺素微球(实验)直接应用于牙龈组织。记录生命体征5分钟。在对侧使用替代(对照或实验)治疗重复该程序。结果:与生理盐水相比,局部消旋肾上腺素能显著降低平均舒张压(-11.1% vs -3.9%;P < 0.01)和平均动脉压(-8.1% vs -2.1%;P < 0.01),尽管所有心血管变量的下降在临床上都不显著。所有实验性治疗牙均在2.2分钟后达到充分止血。在5分钟的观察时间内,13颗对照治疗牙中只有5颗达到充分止血(1.6 vs 4.2分钟;P = 0.01)。结论:总的来说,我们得出结论,使用外用外消旋肾上腺素微球不会导致心血管不良反应,与生理盐水微球相比,止血更快、更可预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia progress
Anesthesia progress Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Anesthesia Progress is a peer-reviewed journal and the official publication of the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology. The journal is dedicated to providing a better understanding of the advances being made in the art and science of pain and anxiety control in dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Sedation Levels Using SedLine During Intravenous Sedation for Dental Procedures: A Case-Series Study. Cardiac Arrest Due to Pacing Failure From Pilsicainide Poisoning. A New Dental Specialty in Canada. Literature Review for Office-Based Anesthesia. Hypotension Without Skin Symptoms at Local Anesthesia in Dental Treatment: Anaphylaxis? Or Vasovagal Reaction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1