Understanding the relationship between personality pathology and attachment style in the context of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Personality and Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-05 DOI:10.1002/pmh.1530
Rachel A Pad, Hayrettin Okut, Rosey Zackula, Matthew Macaluso, Steven K Huprich
{"title":"Understanding the relationship between personality pathology and attachment style in the context of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders.","authors":"Rachel A Pad,&nbsp;Hayrettin Okut,&nbsp;Rosey Zackula,&nbsp;Matthew Macaluso,&nbsp;Steven K Huprich","doi":"10.1002/pmh.1530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study utilizes the two different criteria of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorder Assessment to evaluate the relationship between attachment style and personality pathology. One-hundred forty patients from a combined sample of psychiatric and internal medicine clinics were given a survey composed of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire (DLOPFQ), the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF), and the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ). Analysis of variance indicated that attachment styles were differentiated across all four the DLOPFQ scales and the Detachment trait domain. Elastic net regression modeling with bootstrap was used to assess the strength of the level of personality functioning dimensions and trait domains in the prediction of attachment style, both independently and interactively while accounting for multicollinearity. This study offers readers insight to a novel statistical approach to model building that addresses two issues among psychiatric data: high correlation and small sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"163-179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study utilizes the two different criteria of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorder Assessment to evaluate the relationship between attachment style and personality pathology. One-hundred forty patients from a combined sample of psychiatric and internal medicine clinics were given a survey composed of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire (DLOPFQ), the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF), and the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ). Analysis of variance indicated that attachment styles were differentiated across all four the DLOPFQ scales and the Detachment trait domain. Elastic net regression modeling with bootstrap was used to assess the strength of the level of personality functioning dimensions and trait domains in the prediction of attachment style, both independently and interactively while accounting for multicollinearity. This study offers readers insight to a novel statistical approach to model building that addresses two issues among psychiatric data: high correlation and small sample size.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在DSM-5人格障碍替代模型的背景下理解人格病理与依恋类型之间的关系。
本研究采用DSM-5人格障碍替代评估模型的两种不同标准来评估依恋类型与人格病理的关系。对140例精神科和内科门诊患者进行问卷调查,问卷由DSM-5人格功能水平问卷(DLOPFQ)、DSM-5简要人格量表(PID-5-BF)和关系问卷(RQ)组成。方差分析表明,依恋类型在四种DLOPFQ量表和分离特质域之间存在差异。在考虑多重共线性的情况下,采用自举弹性网络回归模型评估人格功能维度和特质域水平在预测依恋风格中的作用强度。这项研究为读者提供了一种新的统计方法来建立模型,解决了精神病学数据中的两个问题:高相关性和小样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.
期刊最新文献
DSM-5 Functional Framework: Structure and Psychopathological Correlates of the DSM-5 Levels of Functioning Questionnaire-Short Form. Correspondence on "Validation of the Personality Disorder Severity for ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) Scale in a Danish Mixed Clinical and Prison Treatment Sample". The Role of Social Adversity in the Association Between Autistic Traits and Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms. Criterion A as Developmental Severity: Reclaiming the Psychodynamic Core of Personality Functioning. Historical Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Current Coping Strategies: The Role of Emotion Regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1