Biopharmaceutical innovation ecosystems: a stakeholder model and the case of Lombardy.

IF 4.6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Technology Transfer Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s10961-021-09890-1
Alberto Bettanti, Antonella Lanati, Alessandro Missoni
{"title":"Biopharmaceutical innovation ecosystems: a stakeholder model and the case of Lombardy.","authors":"Alberto Bettanti,&nbsp;Antonella Lanati,&nbsp;Alessandro Missoni","doi":"10.1007/s10961-021-09890-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to examine biopharma innovation ecosystems (IEs) through the lenses of a stakeholder model. In doing so, this work aims to answer the following research question: which stakeholders are required in an IE within biopharma industry and what are their main roles in the IE value creation. The research strategy was designed according to the grounded theory methodology. By applying this methodology, data were collected through verbatim interviews with several stakeholders. Both data collection and data analysis phases were carried out concurrently up to saturation where all data were identified and their consistency across the many forms was reached. The thesis of the paper intends to prove that biopharma IEs consist of a multilevel and longitudinal set of key stakeholders. Furthermore, by investigating the Lombardy case study, it explains the role of each stakeholder with regards to the comparative advantages required in the engagement with the IE. In addition, arising from a holistic view of the biopharma IEs, this research traces the biopharma IE dynamics through the analysis of the IE's driving forces. This paper represents one of the first heuristic attempts to analyze in-depth biopharma IE from a holistic perspective. The paper findings can be considered to be an impactful extension to biopharma IEs world-wide. This broader scope is well supported by expert interviews as a central part of the methodology and by the investigated scientific literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":48228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Transfer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8485311/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09890-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine biopharma innovation ecosystems (IEs) through the lenses of a stakeholder model. In doing so, this work aims to answer the following research question: which stakeholders are required in an IE within biopharma industry and what are their main roles in the IE value creation. The research strategy was designed according to the grounded theory methodology. By applying this methodology, data were collected through verbatim interviews with several stakeholders. Both data collection and data analysis phases were carried out concurrently up to saturation where all data were identified and their consistency across the many forms was reached. The thesis of the paper intends to prove that biopharma IEs consist of a multilevel and longitudinal set of key stakeholders. Furthermore, by investigating the Lombardy case study, it explains the role of each stakeholder with regards to the comparative advantages required in the engagement with the IE. In addition, arising from a holistic view of the biopharma IEs, this research traces the biopharma IE dynamics through the analysis of the IE's driving forces. This paper represents one of the first heuristic attempts to analyze in-depth biopharma IE from a holistic perspective. The paper findings can be considered to be an impactful extension to biopharma IEs world-wide. This broader scope is well supported by expert interviews as a central part of the methodology and by the investigated scientific literature.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物制药创新生态系统:利益相关者模型和伦巴第案例。
本文的目的是通过利益相关者模型的镜头来检查生物制药创新生态系统(IEs)。在这样做的过程中,这项工作旨在回答以下研究问题:在生物制药行业的IE中需要哪些利益相关者,以及他们在IE价值创造中的主要角色是什么。根据扎根理论方法论设计研究策略。通过应用这种方法,通过对几个利益相关者的逐字访谈收集数据。数据收集和数据分析两个阶段同时进行,直到饱和,所有数据都被识别出来,并在许多形式中达到一致性。本文旨在证明生物制药企业是由多层次和纵向的关键利益相关者组成的。此外,通过调查伦巴第案例研究,它解释了每个利益相关者在与IE合作所需的比较优势方面的作用。此外,本研究从生物制药企业创新的整体视角出发,通过分析企业创新的驱动力,追溯了生物制药企业创新的动态。本文代表了从整体角度深入分析生物制药IE的首次启发式尝试之一。本文的研究结果可以被认为是对世界范围内生物制药IEs的有影响力的延伸。作为研究方法的核心部分,专家访谈和调查的科学文献很好地支持了这一更广泛的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Transfer provides an international forum for research on the economic, managerial and policy implication of technology transfer, entrepreneurship, and innovation. The Journal is especially interested in articles that focus on the relationship between the external environment and organizations (governments, public agencies, firms, universities) and their innovation process. The Journal welcomes alternative modes of presentation ranging from broad empirical analyses, to theoretical models, to case studies based on theoretical foundations.  Officially cited as: J Technol Transf
期刊最新文献
An empirical investigation into UK university–industry collaboration: the development of an impact framework Supply chain constraints and research spending: an international investigation A micro-level study of research impact and motivational diversity Public biofoundries as innovation intermediaries: the integration of translation, sustainability, and responsibility Analysis of factors influencing attitude and intention to use electric vehicles for a sustainable future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1