Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between women of advanced maternal age (≥35 years) versus younger women in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Saudi Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-07 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2021.274
Taghreed Shams, Tala Gazzaz, Khalda Althobiti, Nouf Alghamdi, Waleed Bamarouf, Lujain Almarhoumi, Hashem Alhashemi
{"title":"Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between women of advanced maternal age (≥35 years) versus younger women in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Taghreed Shams,&nbsp;Tala Gazzaz,&nbsp;Khalda Althobiti,&nbsp;Nouf Alghamdi,&nbsp;Waleed Bamarouf,&nbsp;Lujain Almarhoumi,&nbsp;Hashem Alhashemi","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2021.274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnancy in women aged 35 years or above is generally considered an advanced maternal age (AMA). AMA is associated with an increased rate of maternal and neonatal complications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the effect of AMA on maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Analytical cross-sectional study of medical records.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>In-patient hospital tertiary care setting in Jeddah.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All women who attended antenatal care and delivered at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah in the first half of 2018 were included in the study. Outcomes for women 35 years of age or older were compared with younger women. Significant factors in a univariate analysis were entered in a multiple logistic regression model to assess the association between AMA and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rates of maternal neonatal complications, analysis of factors associated with advanced maternal, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>1586 women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1586 women, 406 were 35 years of age or older (25.6%), and 1180 were younger than 35 years. The AMA group had a significantly higher proportion of GDM (32.0% versus 13.2%, <i>P</i><.001). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for GDM was 2.6 (95% CI 2-3.5, <i>P</i><.001.) compared with younger women in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Older women had a higher rate of cesarean delivery (43.6% versus 30.8%, <i>P</i><.001). The adjusted OR for cesarean vs. vaginal delivery was 1.5 (CI 1.2-1.9, <i>P</i>=.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnancy in women 35 years or older was associated with an increased risk of GDM and cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Cross-sectional design, small sample size, single hospital.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":8016,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","volume":"41 5","pages":"274-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cd/9c/0256-4947.2021.274.PMC8497009.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2021.274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy in women aged 35 years or above is generally considered an advanced maternal age (AMA). AMA is associated with an increased rate of maternal and neonatal complications.

Objectives: Assess the effect of AMA on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Design: Analytical cross-sectional study of medical records.

Settings: In-patient hospital tertiary care setting in Jeddah.

Patients and methods: All women who attended antenatal care and delivered at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah in the first half of 2018 were included in the study. Outcomes for women 35 years of age or older were compared with younger women. Significant factors in a univariate analysis were entered in a multiple logistic regression model to assess the association between AMA and outcomes.

Main outcome measures: Rates of maternal neonatal complications, analysis of factors associated with advanced maternal, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), cesarean delivery.

Sample size: 1586 women.

Results: Of the 1586 women, 406 were 35 years of age or older (25.6%), and 1180 were younger than 35 years. The AMA group had a significantly higher proportion of GDM (32.0% versus 13.2%, P<.001). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for GDM was 2.6 (95% CI 2-3.5, P<.001.) compared with younger women in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Older women had a higher rate of cesarean delivery (43.6% versus 30.8%, P<.001). The adjusted OR for cesarean vs. vaginal delivery was 1.5 (CI 1.2-1.9, P=.002).

Conclusion: Pregnancy in women 35 years or older was associated with an increased risk of GDM and cesarean delivery.

Limitations: Cross-sectional design, small sample size, single hospital.

Conflict of interest: None.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯三级护理中心高龄产妇(≥35岁)与年轻妇女妊娠结局的比较。
背景:35岁或以上的妇女怀孕通常被认为是高龄产妇(AMA)。AMA与孕产妇和新生儿并发症发生率增加有关。目的:评估AMA对孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响。设计:对医疗记录进行分析性横断面研究。环境:吉达的住院医院三级保健环境。患者和方法:2018年上半年在吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城接受产前护理和分娩的所有妇女都被纳入研究。将35岁及以上女性的结果与年轻女性进行比较。单变量分析中的重要因素被输入到多元逻辑回归模型中,以评估AMA与结果之间的关系。主要观察指标:产妇新生儿并发症发生率、高龄产妇相关因素分析、妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)、剖宫产。样本量:1586名女性。结果:1586例女性中,年龄在35岁及以上的406例(25.6%),年龄小于35岁的1180例。AMA组GDM比例显著高于对照组(32.0% vs 13.2%, ppp = 0.002)。结论:35岁及以上妇女妊娠与GDM和剖宫产的风险增加有关。局限性:横断面设计,小样本量,单一医院。利益冲突:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Saudi Medicine
Annals of Saudi Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Saudi Medicine (ASM) is published bimonthly by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We publish scientific reports of clinical interest in English. All submissions are subject to peer review by the editorial board and by reviewers in appropriate specialties. The journal will consider for publication manuscripts from any part of the world, but particularly reports that would be of interest to readers in the Middle East or other parts of Asia and Africa. Please go to the Author Resource Center for additional information.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of secondary infections and association with mortality rates of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Management of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: eight cases over 13 years. Effect of atmospheric pressure changes on the development of pulmonary embolism: a retrospective analysis of 8 years of data. Placenta accreta spectrum in major placenta previa diagnosed only by MRI: incidence, risk factors, and maternal morbidity. Effect of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on the fetus in pregnant women who recovered from infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1