Platelet Reactivity Was Not Associated with Infarct Size after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Chonnam Medical Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-24 DOI:10.4068/cmj.2021.57.3.204
Seohwa Park, Kyeong Ho Yun, Jae Young Cho, Seung-Yul Lee
{"title":"Platelet Reactivity Was Not Associated with Infarct Size after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Seohwa Park,&nbsp;Kyeong Ho Yun,&nbsp;Jae Young Cho,&nbsp;Seung-Yul Lee","doi":"10.4068/cmj.2021.57.3.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Potent antiplatelet therapy after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has the potential to reduce infarct size. This study analyzed the association between on-treatment platelet reactivity and myocardial infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary PCI. In this single-center, retrospective study, 253 patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI were divided into two groups according to platelet reactivity measurements (53 patients in the high platelet reactivity [HPR] group and 200 in the non-HPR group). Technetium Tc-99m tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed before hospital discharge. We measured the infarct size using SPECT imaging and serial cardiac biomarker levels, and compared the infarct sizes of each group. The patients with HPR were older (65.5±13.2 vs. 60.6±12.1 years, p=0.011) than the patients with non-HPR. On the other hand, the non-HPR group had a higher incidence of smoking (26.4% vs. 51.0%, p=0.001) than the HPR group. Infarct size was similar between the two groups (22.6±17.3% vs. 24.8±17.7%, p=0.416). Multivariate analysis revealed that onset to balloon time >240 min (odds ratio [OR]=1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08-3.40; p=0.025) and anterior infarction (OR=5.28; 95% CI=3.05-9.14; p<0.001) were independent predictors of large (>22%) infarct size. HPR was not a predictor of infarct size assessed by SPECT. The two groups also showed analogous cumulative creatinine kinase-myocardial band and troponin T levels. In conclusion, compared to non-HPR, HPR showed no significant association with myocardial infarct size measured by SPECT imaging in early phase of MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10307,"journal":{"name":"Chonnam Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/9f/cmj-57-204.PMC8485085.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chonnam Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2021.57.3.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Potent antiplatelet therapy after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has the potential to reduce infarct size. This study analyzed the association between on-treatment platelet reactivity and myocardial infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary PCI. In this single-center, retrospective study, 253 patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI were divided into two groups according to platelet reactivity measurements (53 patients in the high platelet reactivity [HPR] group and 200 in the non-HPR group). Technetium Tc-99m tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed before hospital discharge. We measured the infarct size using SPECT imaging and serial cardiac biomarker levels, and compared the infarct sizes of each group. The patients with HPR were older (65.5±13.2 vs. 60.6±12.1 years, p=0.011) than the patients with non-HPR. On the other hand, the non-HPR group had a higher incidence of smoking (26.4% vs. 51.0%, p=0.001) than the HPR group. Infarct size was similar between the two groups (22.6±17.3% vs. 24.8±17.7%, p=0.416). Multivariate analysis revealed that onset to balloon time >240 min (odds ratio [OR]=1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08-3.40; p=0.025) and anterior infarction (OR=5.28; 95% CI=3.05-9.14; p<0.001) were independent predictors of large (>22%) infarct size. HPR was not a predictor of infarct size assessed by SPECT. The two groups also showed analogous cumulative creatinine kinase-myocardial band and troponin T levels. In conclusion, compared to non-HPR, HPR showed no significant association with myocardial infarct size measured by SPECT imaging in early phase of MI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血小板反应性与梗死面积无关。
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后有效的抗血小板治疗有可能减少梗死面积。本研究分析了st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者接受初级PCI治疗时血小板反应性与心肌梗死面积之间的关系。在这项单中心回顾性研究中,253例STEMI患者接受了首次PCI治疗,根据血小板反应性分为两组(高血小板反应性[HPR]组53例,非HPR组200例)。出院前行Tc-99m四氟氰单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)。我们使用SPECT成像和一系列心脏生物标志物水平测量梗死面积,并比较各组梗死面积。HPR患者比非HPR患者年龄大(65.5±13.2∶60.6±12.1,p=0.011)。另一方面,非HPR组的吸烟发生率高于HPR组(26.4%比51.0%,p=0.001)。两组梗死面积相似(22.6±17.3% vs. 24.8±17.7%,p=0.416)。多因素分析显示,发病至球囊时间>240 min(优势比[OR]=1.92;95%置信区间[CI]=1.08-3.40;p=0.025)和前壁梗死(OR=5.28;95%可信区间= 3.05 - -9.14;P22%)梗死面积。HPR不是SPECT评估梗死面积的预测因子。两组也显示相似的累积肌酸酐激酶-心肌带和肌钙蛋白T水平。总之,与非HPR相比,HPR与心肌梗死早期SPECT成像测量的心肌梗死面积无显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urban-Rural Differences in the Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms in Korean Adults. Adverse Effects Associated with Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors. Vomiting Associated with Rapid Weight Loss. Gender Differences in the Risk of Depression in Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors Compared to the General Population without Stroke. Superior Sagittal Sinus Thrombosis in Chronic Liver Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1