Prioritization of Pesticides for Assessment of Risk to Aquatic Ecosystems in Canada and Identification of Knowledge Gaps.

IF 6.1 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1007/398_2021_81
Julie C Anderson, Sarah C Marteinson, Ryan S Prosser
{"title":"Prioritization of Pesticides for Assessment of Risk to Aquatic Ecosystems in Canada and Identification of Knowledge Gaps.","authors":"Julie C Anderson,&nbsp;Sarah C Marteinson,&nbsp;Ryan S Prosser","doi":"10.1007/398_2021_81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pesticides can enter aquatic environments via direct application, via overspray or drift during application, or by runoff or leaching from fields during rain events, where they can have unintended effects on non-target aquatic biota. As such, Fisheries and Oceans Canada identified a need to prioritize current-use pesticides based on potential risks towards fish, their prey species, and habitats in Canada. A literature review was conducted to: (1) Identify current-use pesticides of concern for Canadian marine and freshwater environments based on use and environmental presence in Canada, (2) Outline current knowledge on the biological effects of the pesticides of concern, and (3) Identify general data gaps specific to biological effects of pesticides on aquatic species. Prioritization was based upon recent sales data, measured concentrations in Canadian aquatic environments between 2000 and 2020, and inherent toxicity as represented by aquatic guideline values. Prioritization identified 55 pesticides for further research nationally. Based on rank, a sub-group of seven were chosen as the top-priority pesticides, including three herbicides (atrazine, diquat, and S-metolachlor), three insecticides (chlorpyrifos, clothianidin, and permethrin), and one fungicide (chlorothalonil). A number of knowledge gaps became apparent through this process, including gaps in our understanding of sub-lethal toxicity, environmental fate, species sensitivity distributions, and/or surface water concentrations for each of the active ingredients reviewed. More generally, we identified a need for more baseline fish and fish habitat data, ongoing environmental monitoring, development of marine and sediment-toxicity benchmarks, improved study design including sufficiently low method detection limits, and collaboration around accessible data reporting and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"259 ","pages":"171-231"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2021_81","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Pesticides can enter aquatic environments via direct application, via overspray or drift during application, or by runoff or leaching from fields during rain events, where they can have unintended effects on non-target aquatic biota. As such, Fisheries and Oceans Canada identified a need to prioritize current-use pesticides based on potential risks towards fish, their prey species, and habitats in Canada. A literature review was conducted to: (1) Identify current-use pesticides of concern for Canadian marine and freshwater environments based on use and environmental presence in Canada, (2) Outline current knowledge on the biological effects of the pesticides of concern, and (3) Identify general data gaps specific to biological effects of pesticides on aquatic species. Prioritization was based upon recent sales data, measured concentrations in Canadian aquatic environments between 2000 and 2020, and inherent toxicity as represented by aquatic guideline values. Prioritization identified 55 pesticides for further research nationally. Based on rank, a sub-group of seven were chosen as the top-priority pesticides, including three herbicides (atrazine, diquat, and S-metolachlor), three insecticides (chlorpyrifos, clothianidin, and permethrin), and one fungicide (chlorothalonil). A number of knowledge gaps became apparent through this process, including gaps in our understanding of sub-lethal toxicity, environmental fate, species sensitivity distributions, and/or surface water concentrations for each of the active ingredients reviewed. More generally, we identified a need for more baseline fish and fish habitat data, ongoing environmental monitoring, development of marine and sediment-toxicity benchmarks, improved study design including sufficiently low method detection limits, and collaboration around accessible data reporting and management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大水生生态系统风险评估中农药的优先排序和知识空白的确定。
农药可以通过直接施用、过量喷洒或在施用过程中漂移,或在降雨期间通过农田径流或淋滤进入水生环境,从而对非目标水生生物群产生意想不到的影响。因此,加拿大渔业和海洋部确定有必要根据对加拿大鱼类、其猎物种类和栖息地的潜在风险,对当前使用的农药进行优先排序。进行文献综述,以:(1)根据加拿大的使用和环境存在,确定当前使用的加拿大海洋和淡水环境关注的农药,(2)概述当前关于关注农药的生物效应的知识,以及(3)确定农药对水生物种的生物效应的一般数据缺口。优先排序基于最近的销售数据、2000年至2020年加拿大水生环境中测量的浓度以及水生指导值所代表的固有毒性。优先确定了55种农药供全国进一步研究。根据排名,选择了7个亚组作为最优先的农药,包括3种除草剂(阿特拉津、敌敌畏和s -甲草胺)、3种杀虫剂(毒死蜱、噻虫胺和氯菊酯)和1种杀菌剂(百菌清)。在这一过程中,许多知识空白变得明显,包括我们对亚致死毒性、环境命运、物种敏感性分布和/或每一种活性成分的地表水浓度的理解空白。更一般地说,我们确定需要更多的基线鱼类和鱼类栖息地数据,持续的环境监测,海洋和沉积物毒性基准的开发,改进的研究设计,包括足够低的方法检测限,以及围绕可访问的数据报告和管理进行合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology publishes reviews pertaining to the sources, transport, fate and effects of contaminants in the environment. The journal provides a place for the publication of critical reviews of the current knowledge and understanding of environmental sciences in order to provide insight into contaminant pathways, fate and behavior in environmental compartments and the possible consequences of their presence, with multidisciplinary contributions from the fields of analytical chemistry, biochemistry, biology, ecology, molecular and cellular biology (in an environmental context), and human, wildlife and environmental toxicology. •Standing on a 55+ year history of publishing environmental toxicology reviews •Now publishing in journal format boasting rigorous review and expanded editorial board •Publishing home for extensive environmental reviews dealing with sources, transport, fate and effect of contaminants •Through Springer Compact agreements, authors from participating institutions can publish Open Choice at no cost to the authors
期刊最新文献
Environmental Impact Assessment in the Entire Life Cycle of Lithium-Ion Batteries A Review of Life Cycle Assessment of Soil Remediation Technology: Method Applications and Technological Characteristics Advances in Microbe-Driven Ecological Restoration on Bauxite Residue Disposal Areas Green Agriculture: Nanoparticles as Tools to Mitigate Heavy Metal Toxicity Use of Additives in Composting Promotes Passivation and Reduction in Bioavailability of Heavy Metals (HMs) in Compost
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1