The Relational Trip Task, a novel ecological measure of relational memory: data from a schizophrenia sample.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-11 DOI:10.1080/13546805.2021.1987870
Ana Elisa Sousa, Gabrielle Pochiet, Jennifer D Ryan, Martin Lepage
{"title":"The Relational Trip Task, a novel ecological measure of relational memory: data from a schizophrenia sample.","authors":"Ana Elisa Sousa,&nbsp;Gabrielle Pochiet,&nbsp;Jennifer D Ryan,&nbsp;Martin Lepage","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2021.1987870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Relational memory (RM) is severely impaired in schizophrenia. Unitisation can circumvent RM impairments in clinical populations as measured by the transverse-patterning (TP) task, a well-established measure of RM capacity. We compared memory performance on a new ecological RM measure, the Relational Trip Task (RTT), to that of TP at baseline and examined the effects of a unitisation intervention in RTT performance. RTT involves learning relational information of real-life stimuli, such as the relationship between people and places or objects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TP and RTT performances were examined in 45 individuals with schizophrenia. TP-impaired participants (<i>n</i> = 22) were randomised to either the intervention or an active control group. TP and RTT were administered again after unitisation training. Task validity and reliability were assessed. Intervention group's pre- and post-RTT accuracies were compared and contrasted to that in the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RTT and TP were moderately correlated. TP non-learners had inferior performance in RTT at baseline. Improvement in RTT performance after unitisation training was observed in the intervention group; no pre-post improvement was observed in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RTT has an acceptable criterion validity and excellent alternate-form reliability. Unitisation seemed to be successfully generalized to support associations of real-life stimuli.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":"26 6","pages":"421-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2021.1987870","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Relational memory (RM) is severely impaired in schizophrenia. Unitisation can circumvent RM impairments in clinical populations as measured by the transverse-patterning (TP) task, a well-established measure of RM capacity. We compared memory performance on a new ecological RM measure, the Relational Trip Task (RTT), to that of TP at baseline and examined the effects of a unitisation intervention in RTT performance. RTT involves learning relational information of real-life stimuli, such as the relationship between people and places or objects.

Methods: TP and RTT performances were examined in 45 individuals with schizophrenia. TP-impaired participants (n = 22) were randomised to either the intervention or an active control group. TP and RTT were administered again after unitisation training. Task validity and reliability were assessed. Intervention group's pre- and post-RTT accuracies were compared and contrasted to that in the control group.

Results: RTT and TP were moderately correlated. TP non-learners had inferior performance in RTT at baseline. Improvement in RTT performance after unitisation training was observed in the intervention group; no pre-post improvement was observed in the control group.

Conclusion: RTT has an acceptable criterion validity and excellent alternate-form reliability. Unitisation seemed to be successfully generalized to support associations of real-life stimuli.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关系旅行任务,一种新的关系记忆的生态测量:来自精神分裂症样本的数据。
关系记忆(RM)在精神分裂症中严重受损。通过横向模式(TP)任务,一种完善的RM能力测量,统一可以避免临床人群中的RM损伤。我们比较了一种新的生态RM测量的记忆性能,关系旅行任务(RTT),与TP基线的记忆性能,并检查了统一干预对RTT性能的影响。RTT包括学习现实生活刺激的关系信息,比如人与地点或物体之间的关系。方法:对45例精神分裂症患者进行TP和RTT测试。tp受损的参与者(n = 22)被随机分为干预组或积极对照组。统一训练后再次进行TP和RTT。评估任务效度和信度。将干预组rtt前后的准确性与对照组进行比较。结果:RTT与TP呈正相关。非TP学习者在RTT的基线表现较差。观察到干预组在统一训练后RTT表现的改善;对照组未见前后改善。结论:RTT具有良好的标准效度和良好的替代信度。统一似乎被成功地推广到支持现实生活刺激的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
期刊最新文献
How disrupted interoception could lead to disturbances in perceptual reality monitoring. Can neurocognitive performance account for dimensional paranoid ideation? Conspiracy mentality in autistic and non-autistic individuals Pattern glare sensitivity distinguishes subclinical autism and schizotypy. Limited awareness of hallucinations in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1