Workplace Violence in Emergency Departments in Turkey.

Avicenna Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2021-08-13 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1732284
Mustafa Sabak, Ameer Al-Hadidi, Mehmet Murat Oktay, Behcet Al, Tanyeli Kazaz, Terry Kowalenko, Wael Hakmeh
{"title":"Workplace Violence in Emergency Departments in Turkey.","authors":"Mustafa Sabak,&nbsp;Ameer Al-Hadidi,&nbsp;Mehmet Murat Oktay,&nbsp;Behcet Al,&nbsp;Tanyeli Kazaz,&nbsp;Terry Kowalenko,&nbsp;Wael Hakmeh","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1732284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Studies on workplace violence against physicians in emergency departments (EDs) in Turkey are lacking. <b>Methods</b> To describe the frequency and types of workplace violence, a 34-question online survey of the past 12 months was sent to physicians working in EDs in Turkey. Types of violence were categorized as verbal threats, physical assaults, confrontation, stalking, and sexual harassment. <b>Results</b> A total of 366 physicians completed the survey; 4 were excluded (minimum 20 hours/week). Sixty-two percent of respondents were men. Ninety-nine percent reported verbal abuse and 54% reported physical violence. Family members, not patients, were the most common perpetrators of every form of workplace violence. Hospitals limiting the number of visitors and loitering had 14% reduction in physical threats. Only 23% of respondents indicated that their hospital offered information about preventing and managing workplace violence even though 86% noted interest. Only 1% never had fear, even though 89% indicated they had security staff. Over 89% felt that hospital security was lacking in number and ability to protect. For 82%, workplace violence affected their ability to provide patient care. Ninety percent indicated that current laws do not adequately protect them. There was also no statistically significant difference in any type of workplace violence based on the timing or length of shifts, type of hospital, or number of hours worked. Of all types of violence reported, only stalking demonstrated a statistically significant difference between men and women. <b>Conclusion</b> Workplace violence is a real danger for physicians working in EDs in Turkey, similar to other countries, demonstrating that this problem transcends borders. Further studies should assess root causes of violent behaviors of patients and their visitors, as well as possible (administrative, social, and legal) mechanisms to minimize such violence. Hospitals that limited the number of visitors and empowered security officers were associated with decreased violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":32889,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a7/c7/10-1055-s-0041-1732284.PMC8500074.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Studies on workplace violence against physicians in emergency departments (EDs) in Turkey are lacking. Methods To describe the frequency and types of workplace violence, a 34-question online survey of the past 12 months was sent to physicians working in EDs in Turkey. Types of violence were categorized as verbal threats, physical assaults, confrontation, stalking, and sexual harassment. Results A total of 366 physicians completed the survey; 4 were excluded (minimum 20 hours/week). Sixty-two percent of respondents were men. Ninety-nine percent reported verbal abuse and 54% reported physical violence. Family members, not patients, were the most common perpetrators of every form of workplace violence. Hospitals limiting the number of visitors and loitering had 14% reduction in physical threats. Only 23% of respondents indicated that their hospital offered information about preventing and managing workplace violence even though 86% noted interest. Only 1% never had fear, even though 89% indicated they had security staff. Over 89% felt that hospital security was lacking in number and ability to protect. For 82%, workplace violence affected their ability to provide patient care. Ninety percent indicated that current laws do not adequately protect them. There was also no statistically significant difference in any type of workplace violence based on the timing or length of shifts, type of hospital, or number of hours worked. Of all types of violence reported, only stalking demonstrated a statistically significant difference between men and women. Conclusion Workplace violence is a real danger for physicians working in EDs in Turkey, similar to other countries, demonstrating that this problem transcends borders. Further studies should assess root causes of violent behaviors of patients and their visitors, as well as possible (administrative, social, and legal) mechanisms to minimize such violence. Hospitals that limited the number of visitors and empowered security officers were associated with decreased violence.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其急诊部门的工作场所暴力。
背景:土耳其缺乏针对急诊科医生的工作场所暴力的研究。方法为描述工作场所暴力的频率和类型,向在土耳其急诊科工作的医生发送了过去12个月的34个问题的在线调查。暴力类型分为口头威胁、身体攻击、对抗、跟踪和性骚扰。结果共366名医师完成调查;4例被排除(最少20小时/周)。62%的受访者是男性。99%的人报告了语言虐待,54%的人报告了身体暴力。在各种形式的职场暴力中,最常见的肇事者是家庭成员,而不是病人。医院限制访客和闲逛的数量,人身威胁减少了14%。只有23%的受访者表示,他们的医院提供有关预防和管理工作场所暴力的信息,尽管86%的人表示感兴趣。只有1%的人从不害怕,尽管89%的人表示他们有保安人员。超过89%的人认为医院安全在数量和保护能力上都有所欠缺。对82%的人来说,工作场所暴力影响了他们提供病人护理的能力。90%的人表示,现行法律没有充分保护他们。根据轮班时间或时间长短、医院类型或工作时间长短,任何类型的工作场所暴力在统计上也没有显著差异。在所有报告的暴力类型中,只有跟踪在男女之间显示出统计学上的显著差异。与其他国家一样,工作场所暴力对在土耳其急诊室工作的医生来说是一个真正的危险,这表明这个问题超越了国界。进一步的研究应评估患者及其来访者暴力行为的根本原因,以及尽可能减少此类暴力的(行政、社会和法律)机制。限制探视人数和授权保安人员的医院与减少暴力有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clearing the Skepticism about Subclinical Hypothyroidism: Is It Beneficial to Treat Patients with Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone >4.5 and <10 mIU/L? Investigation of Correlation between Communication Skills and Self-Reported Elder Mistreatment in Family Abuse. Burden of Chronic Hemodialysis on the Ability to Work: Time for Action. Rheumatic Diseases Amidst Conflict in Northwest Syria: Unveiling Health Challenges and Implications Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastasizing to Oral Soft Tissues: Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1