"Left in limbo": Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2021-10-16 DOI:10.1186/s13053-021-00201-1
Nicole den Elzen, Sharelle L Joseland, Sibel Saya, Sowmya Jonnagadla, Joanne Isbister, Ingrid Winship, Daniel D Buchanan
{"title":"\"Left in limbo\": Exploring how patients with colorectal cancer interpret and respond to a suspected Lynch syndrome diagnosis.","authors":"Nicole den Elzen,&nbsp;Sharelle L Joseland,&nbsp;Sibel Saya,&nbsp;Sowmya Jonnagadla,&nbsp;Joanne Isbister,&nbsp;Ingrid Winship,&nbsp;Daniel D Buchanan","doi":"10.1186/s13053-021-00201-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A diagnosis of suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS) is given when a tumour displays characteristics consistent with Lynch syndrome (LS), but no germline pathogenic variant is identified. This inconclusive diagnosis results in uncertainty around appropriate cancer risk management. This qualitative study explored how patients with CRC interpret and respond to an SLS diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 15 patients with CRC who received an SLS diagnosis, recruited from cancer genetics services across Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Participant responses were compared with appointment summary letters from cancer genetics services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' interpretations of genetic test results were found to vary widely. While this variation often aligned with variation in interpretations by cancer genetics services, participants also had difficulties with the complexity and recall of genetic test results. Participants had a range of psychological responses to the uncertainty that their results presented, from relief to disappointment and doubt. Cancer risk perceptions also varied widely, with participants' interpretations of their genetic test results just one of several influencing factors. Despite this variability, almost all participants adhered to cancer risk management advice, although different participants received different advice. All participants also communicated any cancer risk management advice to first-degree relatives, motivated by protecting them, but information communicated was not always consistent with advice received.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study findings highlight the variability in patients' interpretations of their diagnosis, cancer risk management and family communication when a diagnosis of SLS is received, and provide novel insights into how healthcare professionals can better support patients with SLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":55058,"journal":{"name":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8520179/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00201-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: A diagnosis of suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS) is given when a tumour displays characteristics consistent with Lynch syndrome (LS), but no germline pathogenic variant is identified. This inconclusive diagnosis results in uncertainty around appropriate cancer risk management. This qualitative study explored how patients with CRC interpret and respond to an SLS diagnosis.

Methods: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 15 patients with CRC who received an SLS diagnosis, recruited from cancer genetics services across Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Participant responses were compared with appointment summary letters from cancer genetics services.

Results: Participants' interpretations of genetic test results were found to vary widely. While this variation often aligned with variation in interpretations by cancer genetics services, participants also had difficulties with the complexity and recall of genetic test results. Participants had a range of psychological responses to the uncertainty that their results presented, from relief to disappointment and doubt. Cancer risk perceptions also varied widely, with participants' interpretations of their genetic test results just one of several influencing factors. Despite this variability, almost all participants adhered to cancer risk management advice, although different participants received different advice. All participants also communicated any cancer risk management advice to first-degree relatives, motivated by protecting them, but information communicated was not always consistent with advice received.

Conclusions: Our study findings highlight the variability in patients' interpretations of their diagnosis, cancer risk management and family communication when a diagnosis of SLS is received, and provide novel insights into how healthcare professionals can better support patients with SLS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“陷入困境”:探讨结直肠癌患者对疑似Lynch综合征诊断的理解和反应。
背景:当肿瘤表现出与Lynch综合征(LS)一致的特征时,诊断为疑似Lynch综合征(SLS),但未发现种系致病变异。这种不确定的诊断导致在适当的癌症风险管理方面存在不确定性。本定性研究探讨了CRC患者对SLS诊断的理解和反应。方法:对15名接受SLS诊断的结直肠癌患者进行半结构化电话访谈,这些患者来自澳大利亚的癌症遗传学服务机构。访谈内容逐字记录,并采用专题分析进行分析。参与者的回答与癌症遗传学服务的预约摘要信件进行了比较。结果:参与者对基因检测结果的解释差异很大。虽然这种差异通常与癌症遗传学服务解释的差异一致,但参与者在基因测试结果的复杂性和回忆方面也存在困难。参与者对结果的不确定性有一系列的心理反应,从宽慰到失望和怀疑。对癌症风险的认知也存在很大差异,参与者对基因检测结果的解释只是几个影响因素之一。尽管存在差异,但几乎所有参与者都遵守了癌症风险管理建议,尽管不同的参与者收到了不同的建议。出于保护他们的动机,所有参与者还向一级亲属传达了任何癌症风险管理建议,但传达的信息并不总是与收到的建议一致。结论:我们的研究结果强调了在接受SLS诊断时,患者对其诊断、癌症风险管理和家庭沟通的解释存在差异,并为医疗保健专业人员如何更好地支持SLS患者提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice is an open access journal that publishes articles of interest for the cancer genetics community and serves as a discussion forum for the development appropriate healthcare strategies. Cancer genetics encompasses a wide variety of disciplines and knowledge in the field is rapidly growing, especially as the amount of information linking genetic differences to inherited cancer predispositions continues expanding. With the increased knowledge of genetic variability and how this relates to cancer risk there is a growing demand not only to disseminate this information into clinical practice but also to enable competent debate concerning how such information is managed and what it implies for patient care. Topics covered by the journal include but are not limited to: Original research articles on any aspect of inherited predispositions to cancer. Reviews of inherited cancer predispositions. Application of molecular and cytogenetic analysis to clinical decision making. Clinical aspects of the management of hereditary cancers. Genetic counselling issues associated with cancer genetics. The role of registries in improving health care of patients with an inherited predisposition to cancer.
期刊最新文献
Current advances and challenges in Managing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC): a narrative review. PMS2 mutation spectra in Norway and risk of cancer for carriers of pathogenic variants. Blood molybdenum level as a marker of cancer risk on BRCA1 carriers Universal screening of colorectal tumors for lynch syndrome: a survey of patient experiences and opinions. Adrenal tumours in patients with pathogenic APC mutations: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1