What happened to hip fragility fractures during COVID-19 pandemic?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY Acta reumatologica portuguesa Pub Date : 2021-07-01
Carolina Mazeda, Pedro Bernardo Santos, Paulo Vilas-Boas, Joana Antão, Anabela Barcelos
{"title":"What happened to hip fragility fractures during COVID-19 pandemic?","authors":"Carolina Mazeda,&nbsp;Pedro Bernardo Santos,&nbsp;Paulo Vilas-Boas,&nbsp;Joana Antão,&nbsp;Anabela Barcelos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>COVID-19 changed the dynamics of all healthcare system, leading to the restructuring of inpatient teams as well as the emergency department. Scheduled surgeries were suspended, operating rooms were closed, and anesthesiologists redistributed among the various intensive care units. At the Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga the number of patients admitted to the emergency department decreased to approximately 8.000 during the period of lockdown which ranged from 18th March to 1st June 2020. The aim of this study was to compare the number of patients presenting with hip fractures during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic with the equivalent period in 2019 and to analyze postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational retrospective study was conducted in two different periods. Patients over the age of 50 years admitted with hip fracture were included for analysis. The data was collected from the hospital database. A general descriptive analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an overall reduction in the number of admissions due to hip fractures in Period 2020 compared with homologous Period in 2019 (68 patients and 94 patients, respectively). No statistically significant differences could be found regarding age, gender, ASA grade and pre-admission residence among patients admitted during these both periods. Nursing home patients in Period 2020 had a longer hospital stay (p=0.03), independently of the functional status (p=0.07). There were no statistically significant differences in the time it took the patient to go to the emergency department after the fall, place where the fracture had occurred, waiting time to perform the surgery, type of treatment performed, post-surgical complications and mortality. There was no relationship between mortality and the time it took the patient to access the emergency department (p=0,487), or mortality and the mean length of stay in the hospital (p=0,151). All the patients admitted to the emergency department in Period 2020 were negative to PCR test for SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The measures taken by the hospital during the pandemic had no impact in the healthcare provided to the admitted patients. This should be taken into account in order to optimize the efficiency of the health care system in future outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":7229,"journal":{"name":"Acta reumatologica portuguesa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta reumatologica portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: COVID-19 changed the dynamics of all healthcare system, leading to the restructuring of inpatient teams as well as the emergency department. Scheduled surgeries were suspended, operating rooms were closed, and anesthesiologists redistributed among the various intensive care units. At the Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga the number of patients admitted to the emergency department decreased to approximately 8.000 during the period of lockdown which ranged from 18th March to 1st June 2020. The aim of this study was to compare the number of patients presenting with hip fractures during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic with the equivalent period in 2019 and to analyze postoperative outcomes.

Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted in two different periods. Patients over the age of 50 years admitted with hip fracture were included for analysis. The data was collected from the hospital database. A general descriptive analysis was performed.

Results: There was an overall reduction in the number of admissions due to hip fractures in Period 2020 compared with homologous Period in 2019 (68 patients and 94 patients, respectively). No statistically significant differences could be found regarding age, gender, ASA grade and pre-admission residence among patients admitted during these both periods. Nursing home patients in Period 2020 had a longer hospital stay (p=0.03), independently of the functional status (p=0.07). There were no statistically significant differences in the time it took the patient to go to the emergency department after the fall, place where the fracture had occurred, waiting time to perform the surgery, type of treatment performed, post-surgical complications and mortality. There was no relationship between mortality and the time it took the patient to access the emergency department (p=0,487), or mortality and the mean length of stay in the hospital (p=0,151). All the patients admitted to the emergency department in Period 2020 were negative to PCR test for SARS-CoV-2.

Conclusion: The measures taken by the hospital during the pandemic had no impact in the healthcare provided to the admitted patients. This should be taken into account in order to optimize the efficiency of the health care system in future outbreaks.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,髋部脆性骨折发生了什么?
目的:COVID-19改变了所有医疗保健系统的动态,导致住院团队和急诊科的重组。预定的手术被暂停,手术室被关闭,麻醉师被重新分配到各个重症监护室。在Baixo Vouga中心医院,在2020年3月18日至6月1日的封锁期间,急诊科收治的患者人数减少到约8000人。本研究的目的是比较2019年第一波COVID-19大流行期间髋部骨折患者的数量,并分析术后结果。方法:在两个不同时期进行观察性回顾性研究。年龄超过50岁的髋部骨折患者被纳入分析。数据是从医院数据库中收集的。进行一般性描述性分析。结果:与2019年同期相比,2020年髋部骨折入院人数总体减少(分别为68例和94例)。两期住院患者的年龄、性别、ASA分级及入院前居住地均无统计学差异。2020年期间养老院患者住院时间较长(p=0.03),与功能状态无关(p=0.07)。在患者跌倒后到急诊室的时间、骨折发生的位置、等待手术的时间、所进行的治疗类型、术后并发症和死亡率方面,没有统计学上的显著差异。死亡率与患者进入急诊科所需的时间(p=0,487)或死亡率与平均住院时间(p=0,151)之间没有关系。2020年期间急诊科收治的患者SARS-CoV-2 PCR检测均阴性。结论:大流行期间医院采取的措施对住院患者的医疗服务没有影响。应考虑到这一点,以便在未来疫情爆发时优化卫生保健系统的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta reumatologica portuguesa
Acta reumatologica portuguesa 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Reumatólogica Portuguesa is a scientific peer reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatic diseases and related to Rheumatology. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, clinical cases, images in rheumatology, letters to the editor and clinical teaching (e.g. guidelines and clinical protocols). Published since 1973, Acta Reumatológica Portuguesa is the official scientific publication of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology, a non-profit organization that promotes the knowledge and investigation of rheumatic diseases and the development of Rheumatology.
期刊最新文献
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis - the incomplete puzzle. Large-vessel vasculitis induced by pegfilgrastim. How did we get here? Do mobility exercises in different environments have different effects in ankylosing spondylitis? Evolution of clinical, histological and serological features in a Primary Sjὄgren´s Syndrome cohort and the limitations of the current classification criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1