Physician trainees' compassion satisfaction, burnout, and self-efficacy when caring for people who inject drugs.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Substance abuse Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-19 DOI:10.1080/08897077.2021.1986881
Raagini Jawa, Jordana Laks, Nivetha Saravanan, Lindsay Demers, Gabriel Wishik-Miller
{"title":"Physician trainees' compassion satisfaction, burnout, and self-efficacy when caring for people who inject drugs.","authors":"Raagini Jawa,&nbsp;Jordana Laks,&nbsp;Nivetha Saravanan,&nbsp;Lindsay Demers,&nbsp;Gabriel Wishik-Miller","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2021.1986881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Front-line providers working with people who inject drugs (PWID) are at increased risk of experiencing burnout. Few studies have examined protective factors against burnout incurred in the care of PWID, including harm reduction counseling skills. We measured self-efficacy in harm reduction counseling, burnout, and compassion satisfaction among Internal Medicine (IM) trainees caring for PWID. <i>Methods</i>: In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed IM interns and residents. Self-efficacy was assessed by asking trainees about attitudes, comfort, and knowledge in harm reduction counseling on a five-point Likert scale. Burnout and compassion satisfaction were assessed via an adapted 20-question Professional Quality of Life Scale. We compared self-efficacy in harm reduction counseling, compassion satisfaction, and burnout between interns and residents using ANOVA and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests. We used Spearman's rho correlational analysis to examine the relationship between these three variables. <i>Results</i>: Seventy-nine IM trainees (36 interns, 43 residents) completed the survey for a 52% response rate. Residents reported higher self-efficacy in harm reduction counseling, similar levels of burnout, and higher compassion satisfaction compared to interns. Across training levels, we found a negative correlation between burnout and compassion satisfaction (<i>r</i> = -0.55, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and a positive correlation between compassion satisfaction and comfort counseling PWID on harm reduction (<i>r</i> = 0.30, <i>p</i> < 0.01). <i>Conclusions</i>: Among IM trainees at an urban institution serving a large population of PWID, self-efficacy in harm reduction counseling and compassion satisfaction increase with time in training while burnout remains similar. Strengthening trainees' capacity to counsel PWID on harm reduction may improve their compassion satisfaction in caring for this population, potentially leading to improved care. This relationship should be explored longitudinally in larger cohorts and through evaluations of harm reduction-focused medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1986881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Front-line providers working with people who inject drugs (PWID) are at increased risk of experiencing burnout. Few studies have examined protective factors against burnout incurred in the care of PWID, including harm reduction counseling skills. We measured self-efficacy in harm reduction counseling, burnout, and compassion satisfaction among Internal Medicine (IM) trainees caring for PWID. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed IM interns and residents. Self-efficacy was assessed by asking trainees about attitudes, comfort, and knowledge in harm reduction counseling on a five-point Likert scale. Burnout and compassion satisfaction were assessed via an adapted 20-question Professional Quality of Life Scale. We compared self-efficacy in harm reduction counseling, compassion satisfaction, and burnout between interns and residents using ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests. We used Spearman's rho correlational analysis to examine the relationship between these three variables. Results: Seventy-nine IM trainees (36 interns, 43 residents) completed the survey for a 52% response rate. Residents reported higher self-efficacy in harm reduction counseling, similar levels of burnout, and higher compassion satisfaction compared to interns. Across training levels, we found a negative correlation between burnout and compassion satisfaction (r = -0.55, p < 0.01) and a positive correlation between compassion satisfaction and comfort counseling PWID on harm reduction (r = 0.30, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Among IM trainees at an urban institution serving a large population of PWID, self-efficacy in harm reduction counseling and compassion satisfaction increase with time in training while burnout remains similar. Strengthening trainees' capacity to counsel PWID on harm reduction may improve their compassion satisfaction in caring for this population, potentially leading to improved care. This relationship should be explored longitudinally in larger cohorts and through evaluations of harm reduction-focused medical education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实习医师在照顾注射吸毒者时的同情满足、倦怠和自我效能感。
背景:与注射吸毒者(PWID)一起工作的一线提供者经历倦怠的风险增加。很少有研究检查了在PWID护理中产生的防止倦怠的保护因素,包括减少伤害的咨询技巧。我们测量了内科(IM)受训人员在减少伤害咨询、倦怠和同情满意度方面的自我效能感。方法:在横断面研究中,我们调查了IM实习生和住院医师。自我效能是通过询问受训者在减少伤害咨询方面的态度、舒适度和知识来评估的。倦怠和同情满意度通过一个改编的20个问题的职业生活质量量表进行评估。我们采用方差分析和曼-惠特尼U检验比较了实习生和住院医生在减少伤害咨询、同情满意度和倦怠方面的自我效能感。我们使用Spearman的rho相关分析来检验这三个变量之间的关系。结果:79名实习生(实习生36名,住院医师43名)完成调查,回复率52%。与实习生相比,住院医生在减少伤害咨询方面的自我效能更高,倦怠程度相似,同情心满意度更高。在不同的培训水平上,我们发现倦怠感与同情心满意度呈负相关(r = -0.55, p r = 0.30, p)。结论:在为大量PWID患者服务的城市机构中,在减少伤害咨询中的自我效能感和同情心满意度随着培训时间的增加而增加,而倦怠感保持不变。加强受训者就减少伤害向PWID提供咨询的能力,可能会提高他们在照顾这一人群时的同情心满意度,从而有可能改善护理。这种关系应该在更大的队列中进行纵向探索,并通过评估以减少危害为重点的医学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Substance abuse
Substance abuse SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its 4th decade of publication, Substance Abuse journal is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the official publication of Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA) in association with The International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) and the International Coalition for Addiction Studies in Education (INCASE). Substance Abuse journal offers wide-ranging coverage for healthcare professionals, addiction specialists and others engaged in research, education, clinical care, and service delivery and evaluation. It features articles on a variety of topics, including: Interdisciplinary addiction research, education, and treatment Clinical trial, epidemiology, health services, and translation addiction research Implementation science related to addiction Innovations and subsequent outcomes in addiction education Addiction policy and opinion International addiction topics Clinical care regarding addictions.
期刊最新文献
Cocaine Use is Associated With Increased LVMI in Unstably Housed Women With Polysubstance Use. Impact of Mandated Case Review Policy on Opioid Discontinuation and Mortality Among High-Risk Long-Term Opioid Therapy Patients: The STORM Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Improving DEIB in Addiction Medicine Training Through Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Program Evaluation. Advancing Proficiencies for Health Professionals in the Treatment of Tobacco Use Among Marginalized Communities: Development of a Competency-Based Curriculum and Virtual Workshop. Care Practices of Mental Health Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners Within an Interdisciplinary Primary Care Model for Patients With Substance Use Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1