Jennifer L Hughes, Bruce D Grannemann, Joseph M Trombello, W Blake Martin, Anne K Fuller, Madhukar H Trivedi
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale in youth: Screening in a primary care sample.","authors":"Jennifer L Hughes, Bruce D Grannemann, Joseph M Trombello, W Blake Martin, Anne K Fuller, Madhukar H Trivedi","doi":"10.12788/acp.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety disorders in youth are frequently underdiagnosed and untreated, partly due to a lack of screening in primary care. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale is a brief self-report measure designed to screen for anxiety in primary care settings. However, little is known about the psychometrics of this scale with adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included 579 youth age 11 to 17 years who received screening for depression in a primary care setting through a web-based application, VitalSign<sup>6</sup>, over a 4-year period. Psychometric analyses were completed based on classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using CTT and IRT methods, the GAD-7 has a unidimensional structure with good psychometric properties. In addition, the IRT analysis demonstrates that items 1 and 2 are strongly associated with the total score, and thus are good choices as a 2-item screening tool. Convergent validity was demonstrated, with high correlations between the GAD-7 and other measures of anxiety, and discriminant validity was also demonstrated, with low correlations to measures of other psychological states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This psychometric evaluation of the GAD-7 provides support for the utility of this measure with adolescents. The GAD-2 is a good estimate of GAD-7 total score.</p>","PeriodicalId":50770,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"33 4","pages":"241-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/acp.0047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Background: Anxiety disorders in youth are frequently underdiagnosed and untreated, partly due to a lack of screening in primary care. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale is a brief self-report measure designed to screen for anxiety in primary care settings. However, little is known about the psychometrics of this scale with adolescents.
Methods: Participants included 579 youth age 11 to 17 years who received screening for depression in a primary care setting through a web-based application, VitalSign6, over a 4-year period. Psychometric analyses were completed based on classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT).
Results: Using CTT and IRT methods, the GAD-7 has a unidimensional structure with good psychometric properties. In addition, the IRT analysis demonstrates that items 1 and 2 are strongly associated with the total score, and thus are good choices as a 2-item screening tool. Convergent validity was demonstrated, with high correlations between the GAD-7 and other measures of anxiety, and discriminant validity was also demonstrated, with low correlations to measures of other psychological states.
Conclusions: This psychometric evaluation of the GAD-7 provides support for the utility of this measure with adolescents. The GAD-2 is a good estimate of GAD-7 total score.
期刊介绍:
The ANNALS publishes up-to-date information regarding the diagnosis and /or treatment of persons with mental disorders. Preferred manuscripts are those that report the results of controlled clinical trials, timely and thorough evidence-based reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports that present new appraisals of pertinent clinical topics.