S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Ali Meshkini, Amir Ghorbani Haghjo, Zahra Hasanpour Segherlou, Masoud Nouri-Vaskeh
{"title":"S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Ali Meshkini,&nbsp;Amir Ghorbani Haghjo,&nbsp;Zahra Hasanpour Segherlou,&nbsp;Masoud Nouri-Vaskeh","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2021.89355.1231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the GFAP and S100B ability in prevention unnecessary brain Computed tomography (CT) scan in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and compare them with the single extremity fracture in orthopedic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, two orthopedics patients' groups and mTBI patients were studied to assess the biomarkers' ability in prevention unnecessary brain CT scan at the emergency setting. There were 40 orthopedics' patients with single extremity fracture and 41 mTBI patients. Brain CT scans were done for all mTBI patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Brain CT scans showed no intracranial traumatic lesions. The median levels for S100B in the mTBI group was 14.8 (4.4-335.9) ng/L, and in orthopedic patients' group was 13.3 (5-353.10) ng/L. Statistically significant differences were observed between both groups in S100B levels (<i>p</i>=0.006). The median Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) levels in the mTBI patients' group were 600 (400-16300) and in the orthopedic patients' groups was 60 ng/L (300-14900). Statistically significant differences were observed between groups in GFAP (<i>p</i>=0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that S100B and GFAP serum levels were significantly higher in patients with mTBI than in patients with a single limb fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"9 4","pages":"183-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525696/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2021.89355.1231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: To examine the GFAP and S100B ability in prevention unnecessary brain Computed tomography (CT) scan in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and compare them with the single extremity fracture in orthopedic patients.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, two orthopedics patients' groups and mTBI patients were studied to assess the biomarkers' ability in prevention unnecessary brain CT scan at the emergency setting. There were 40 orthopedics' patients with single extremity fracture and 41 mTBI patients. Brain CT scans were done for all mTBI patients.

Results: Brain CT scans showed no intracranial traumatic lesions. The median levels for S100B in the mTBI group was 14.8 (4.4-335.9) ng/L, and in orthopedic patients' group was 13.3 (5-353.10) ng/L. Statistically significant differences were observed between both groups in S100B levels (p=0.006). The median Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) levels in the mTBI patients' group were 600 (400-16300) and in the orthopedic patients' groups was 60 ng/L (300-14900). Statistically significant differences were observed between groups in GFAP (p=0.041).

Conclusion: Our results showed that S100B and GFAP serum levels were significantly higher in patients with mTBI than in patients with a single limb fracture.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
S100钙结合蛋白B和胶质纤维酸性蛋白在轻度颅脑损伤中的作用。
目的:探讨GFAP和S100B在轻度外伤性脑损伤(mTBI)中预防不必要脑CT扫描的能力,并与骨科患者单肢骨折进行比较。方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,研究了两个骨科患者组和mTBI患者,以评估生物标志物在急诊环境中预防不必要的脑部CT扫描的能力。骨科单肢骨折40例,mTBI 41例。对所有mTBI患者进行脑部CT扫描。结果:颅脑CT扫描未见颅内外伤性病变。mTBI组S100B的中位水平为14.8 (4.4-335.9)ng/L,骨科组为13.3 (5-353.10)ng/L。两组间S100B水平差异有统计学意义(p=0.006)。mTBI患者组中位胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)水平为600(400-16300),骨科患者组为60 ng/L(300-14900)。GFAP组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.041)。结论:我们的研究结果显示,mTBI患者血清S100B和GFAP水平明显高于单侧肢体骨折患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
期刊最新文献
An Epidemiological Investigation on Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from 2010 to 2020. A Novel Skin Incision for Posterior Fossa Midline and Paramedian Lesions: A Technical Note and Case Series. Surgical Treatment versus Conservative Management of Splenic Rupture: Outcomes and Risk Factors. Effect of Intranasal Remifentanil versus Lidocaine on Facilitation of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Cardiovascular Response: A Double-blind Clinical Trial Study. Ten-year Causes of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Patients Referred to Ghaem Hospital from 2009 to 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1