A critique of measures of emotion and empathy in First Peoples' cultural safety in nursing education: A systematic literature review.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Contemporary Nurse Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-25 DOI:10.1080/10376178.2021.1991413
Kyly Mills, D K Creedy, N Sunderland, J Allen, S Corporal
{"title":"A critique of measures of emotion and empathy in First Peoples' cultural safety in nursing education: A systematic literature review.","authors":"Kyly Mills,&nbsp;D K Creedy,&nbsp;N Sunderland,&nbsp;J Allen,&nbsp;S Corporal","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2021.1991413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Australia, undertaking cultural safety education often evokes strong emotional responses by health students. Despite the potential for emotion to drive transformative learning in this space, measures of emotion are uncommon.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review existing tools that intend to measure emotional components of learning in relation to cultural safety education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles published in English from January 2005 to January 2020; reported studies from Australia, New Zealand, Canada and United States of America; and measured an emotional construct/s after an education intervention offered to university students enrolled in a health programme were included. Studies were assessed for quality according to the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight articles were reviewed; five conducted in the United States of America, and three in Australia. Intervention type, measures, methodological rigour and outcomes varied. Studies predominately measured empathy, guilt and/or fear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although students' emotional responses were measured, processes for students to reflect upon these reactions were not incorporated in the classroom. The review has implications for future research and curricula through developments in measuring and acting upon emotion in cultural safety education for nursing students in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":55633,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Nurse","volume":"57 5","pages":"338-355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1991413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Australia, undertaking cultural safety education often evokes strong emotional responses by health students. Despite the potential for emotion to drive transformative learning in this space, measures of emotion are uncommon.

Aim: To review existing tools that intend to measure emotional components of learning in relation to cultural safety education.

Methods: Articles published in English from January 2005 to January 2020; reported studies from Australia, New Zealand, Canada and United States of America; and measured an emotional construct/s after an education intervention offered to university students enrolled in a health programme were included. Studies were assessed for quality according to the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme criteria.

Results: Eight articles were reviewed; five conducted in the United States of America, and three in Australia. Intervention type, measures, methodological rigour and outcomes varied. Studies predominately measured empathy, guilt and/or fear.

Conclusions: Although students' emotional responses were measured, processes for students to reflect upon these reactions were not incorporated in the classroom. The review has implications for future research and curricula through developments in measuring and acting upon emotion in cultural safety education for nursing students in Australia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对护理教育中第一民族文化安全的情感和共情措施的批判:系统的文献综述。
背景:在澳大利亚,开展文化安全教育往往会引起卫生专业学生强烈的情绪反应。尽管在这个领域,情感有可能推动变革性的学习,但情感的测量并不常见。目的:回顾现有的工具,旨在衡量与文化安全教育有关的学习的情感成分。方法:2005年1月~ 2020年1月发表的英文论文;来自澳大利亚、新西兰、加拿大和美利坚合众国的报告研究;并测量了参加健康项目的大学生在接受教育干预后的情绪结构。根据关键评估技能计划标准评估研究的质量。结果:共回顾8篇;五个在美利坚合众国进行,三个在澳大利亚进行。干预类型、措施、方法严谨性和结果各不相同。研究主要测量了同理心、内疚和/或恐惧。结论:虽然测量了学生的情绪反应,但学生反思这些反应的过程并未纳入课堂。通过对澳大利亚护生文化安全教育中情感的测量和作用的发展,本综述对未来的研究和课程具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Nurse
Contemporary Nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Nurse is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to increase nursing skills, knowledge and communication, assist in professional development and to enhance educational standards by publishing stimulating, informative and useful articles on a range of issues influencing professional nursing research, teaching and practice. Contemporary Nurse is a forum for nursing educators, researchers and professionals who require high-quality, peer-reviewed research on emerging research fronts, perspectives and protocols, community and family health, cross-cultural research, recruitment, retention, education, training and practitioner perspectives. Contemporary Nurse publishes original research articles, reviews and discussion papers.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing job satisfaction among advanced nurse practitioners: insights and reflections from Taiwan Special Issue: Advances in Frailty Science Special Issue: Quality Improvement Developing nursing interventions in Paediatric Emergence Delirium: a scoping review Integrating technology in aged care: challenges, opportunities, and a nursing lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1