Interpreting Risk from Sunscreens in the Marine Environment.

Current problems in dermatology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-25 DOI:10.1159/000517636
Abigail Renegar, Denis K Dudley
{"title":"Interpreting Risk from Sunscreens in the Marine Environment.","authors":"Abigail Renegar,&nbsp;Denis K Dudley","doi":"10.1159/000517636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent and pending bans in specific jurisdictions of some organic ultraviolet (UV) filters have resulted in significant concern and controversy over the potential impacts of these contaminants in the marine environment. Organic UV filters have been quantified in the aquatic environment as contaminants in water, sediments, and the tissues of aquatic organisms. The limited available laboratory studies on the toxicity of UV filters to keystone marine species such as reef-building corals describe a wide variety of impacts, from significant acute effects to no observed effects. However, interpretation of results is complicated by differences in methodology, and exposures to single agents in vitro may not reflect the effects of longer exposure to finished sunscreens containing UV filters in combination with numerous other chemicals. Relatively short-term observations of laboratory effects thus may not translate to real-life field conditions, where organisms may be subject to the effects of long-term chronic exposure to UV filters as well as other environmental contaminants and stressors. The lack of current understanding of the full impacts of UV filters, both in the laboratory and in the environment, represents a significant challenge in interpreting the environmental risk associated with the widespread use of sunscreens.</p>","PeriodicalId":11010,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in dermatology","volume":"55 ","pages":"259-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000517636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent and pending bans in specific jurisdictions of some organic ultraviolet (UV) filters have resulted in significant concern and controversy over the potential impacts of these contaminants in the marine environment. Organic UV filters have been quantified in the aquatic environment as contaminants in water, sediments, and the tissues of aquatic organisms. The limited available laboratory studies on the toxicity of UV filters to keystone marine species such as reef-building corals describe a wide variety of impacts, from significant acute effects to no observed effects. However, interpretation of results is complicated by differences in methodology, and exposures to single agents in vitro may not reflect the effects of longer exposure to finished sunscreens containing UV filters in combination with numerous other chemicals. Relatively short-term observations of laboratory effects thus may not translate to real-life field conditions, where organisms may be subject to the effects of long-term chronic exposure to UV filters as well as other environmental contaminants and stressors. The lack of current understanding of the full impacts of UV filters, both in the laboratory and in the environment, represents a significant challenge in interpreting the environmental risk associated with the widespread use of sunscreens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读海洋环境中防晒霜的风险。
最近和即将在特定司法管辖区禁止某些有机紫外线(UV)过滤器,导致了对这些污染物对海洋环境的潜在影响的重大关注和争议。有机紫外线过滤器在水生环境中被量化为水、沉积物和水生生物组织中的污染物。有关紫外线过滤器对重要海洋物种(如造礁珊瑚)毒性的有限实验室研究描述了各种各样的影响,从严重的急性影响到没有观察到的影响。然而,对结果的解释由于方法的不同而变得复杂,并且在体外暴露于单一剂可能不能反映长期暴露于含有紫外线过滤器的成品防晒霜与许多其他化学物质的组合的影响。因此,对实验室效应的相对短期观察可能无法转化为现实生活中的实地条件,在实地条件下,生物体可能受到长期慢性暴露于紫外线过滤器以及其他环境污染物和压力源的影响。目前对紫外线过滤器在实验室和环境中的全面影响缺乏了解,这对解释与广泛使用防晒霜相关的环境风险构成了重大挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auxiliary Utensils in Cosmetic and Medical Tattoo Settings. Static and Dynamic Anatomy of the Face, in Particular Eyebrows, Eyelids and Lips. Stretch Mark Treatment by Tattooing and Microneedling. On the Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Face Masks, Gloves, and Disinfectants to Prevent Transfer of Microbials between the Tattooist and the Customer: A Practical Review of Pros and Cons Including the Occupational Safety of the Tattooist. Microblading Technique for Tattooing of "Hairstrokes" That Simulate Natural Hair: Eyebrow Tattooing and Correction of Medical Conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1