The statistical power of genome-wide association studies for threshold traits with different frequencies of causal variants.

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genetica Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-27 DOI:10.1007/s10709-021-00140-8
Hassan Khanzadeh, Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, Shahrokh Ghovvati
{"title":"The statistical power of genome-wide association studies for threshold traits with different frequencies of causal variants.","authors":"Hassan Khanzadeh,&nbsp;Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh,&nbsp;Shahrokh Ghovvati","doi":"10.1007/s10709-021-00140-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the effects of incidence rate, heritability, and polygenic variance on the statistical power of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for threshold traits. Different incidence rates of threshold trait (1, 3, 5, 10, 25, 40, 50, 60, 75 and 90%), heritability (10 and 25%), and polygenic variance ratio (0 and 25%) were simulated separately for common (MAF ≥ 0.05), low-frequency (0.05 > MAF ≥ 0.01), and rare (MAF < 0.01) variants. Association studies were performed by logistic and linear mixed models. The highest statistical powers were observed in common and low-frequency variants with an incidence of 25-50% and 10-40%, respectively, but for rare variants, the highest statistical power was observed at low incidence. For all causal variant frequencies, the estimated heritability decline with an increase in incidence rate. We found high statistical power for traits with high heritability. In contrast, those with a high polygenic variance ratio have lower statistical power to detect common causal variants using a linear mixed model. These results demonstrate that the incidence rate of threshold traits, heritability, and polygenic variance may affect the statistical power of GWAS. Therefore, it is recommended that the effect of incidence rate, heritability, and polygenic variance be considered in designing GWAS for threshold traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":55121,"journal":{"name":"Genetica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-021-00140-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of incidence rate, heritability, and polygenic variance on the statistical power of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for threshold traits. Different incidence rates of threshold trait (1, 3, 5, 10, 25, 40, 50, 60, 75 and 90%), heritability (10 and 25%), and polygenic variance ratio (0 and 25%) were simulated separately for common (MAF ≥ 0.05), low-frequency (0.05 > MAF ≥ 0.01), and rare (MAF < 0.01) variants. Association studies were performed by logistic and linear mixed models. The highest statistical powers were observed in common and low-frequency variants with an incidence of 25-50% and 10-40%, respectively, but for rare variants, the highest statistical power was observed at low incidence. For all causal variant frequencies, the estimated heritability decline with an increase in incidence rate. We found high statistical power for traits with high heritability. In contrast, those with a high polygenic variance ratio have lower statistical power to detect common causal variants using a linear mixed model. These results demonstrate that the incidence rate of threshold traits, heritability, and polygenic variance may affect the statistical power of GWAS. Therefore, it is recommended that the effect of incidence rate, heritability, and polygenic variance be considered in designing GWAS for threshold traits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有不同因果变异频率的阈值性状的全基因组关联研究的统计能力。
本研究旨在探讨发生率、遗传力和多基因方差对阈值性状全基因组关联研究(GWAS)统计力的影响。分别模拟常见(MAF≥0.05)、低频(0.05 > MAF≥0.01)和罕见(MAF)的阈值性状(1、3、5、10、25、40、50、60、75和90%)、遗传率(10和25%)和多基因方差比(0和25%)的不同发生率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genetica
Genetica 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetica publishes papers dealing with genetics, genomics, and evolution. Our journal covers novel advances in the fields of genomics, conservation genetics, genotype-phenotype interactions, evo-devo, population and quantitative genetics, and biodiversity. Genetica publishes original research articles addressing novel conceptual, experimental, and theoretical issues in these areas, whatever the taxon considered. Biomedical papers and papers on breeding animal and plant genetics are not within the scope of Genetica, unless framed in an evolutionary context. Recent advances in genetics, genomics and evolution are also published in thematic issues and synthesis papers published by experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Genome-wide identification and data mining reveals major-latex protein (MLP) from the PR-10 protein family played defense-related roles against phytopathogenic challenges in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Comparative genomic analysis reveals expansion of the DnaJ gene family in Lagerstroemia indica and its members response to salt stress. Identification and expression analysis of XIP gene family members in rice. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the universal stress protein (USP) gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana, Zea mays, and Oryza sativa. A multi-tissue de novo transcriptome assembly and relative gene expression of the vulnerable freshwater salmonid Thymallus ligericus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1