In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex

Q1 Immunology and Microbiology Cell Surface Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tcsw.2021.100064
James Harrison , John A. Weaver , Maya Desai , Jonathan A.G. Cox
{"title":"In vitro efficacy of relebactam versus avibactam against Mycobacterium abscessus complex","authors":"James Harrison ,&nbsp;John A. Weaver ,&nbsp;Maya Desai ,&nbsp;Jonathan A.G. Cox","doi":"10.1016/j.tcsw.2021.100064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Infections resulting from <em>Mycobacterium abscessus</em> are increasing in prevalence worldwide, with the greatest risk posed to patients with underlying respiratory conditions. Treatment for infections is difficult due to wide ranging intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, which is compounded by the existence of a range of subspecies within the <em>M. abscessus</em> complex, each with varying additional antimicrobial resistance profiles. Previously, the use of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors within a combination therapy has been proposed as an effective treatment option for pulmonary <em>M. abscessus</em> infections. Here, we assess the <em>in vitro</em> efficacy of two non-β-lactam based inhibitors, relebactam and avibactam, as agents against <em>M. abscessus</em> with their respective partner drugs imipenem and ceftazidime, as well as in triplicate combinations with additional β-lactam antibiotics against the <em>M. abscessus</em> complex. We have shown that the commercially available ratio of imipenem to relebactam is the appropriate ratio for bactericidal activity against <em>M. abscessus</em>, whereas the ratio between ceftazidime and avibactam is redundant, due to inactivity of ceftazidime to inhibit the bacteria. We have identified that the use of imipenem and meropenem alongside either relebactam or avibactam yield low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) for each <em>M. abscessus</em> subspecies, which are within the therapeutically achievable concentration ranges within the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs. We propose the implementation of imipenem with relebactam in place of stand-alone imipenem into the current treatment regime, alongside meropenem, as a future front-line treatment option for <em>M. abscessus</em> complex infections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36539,"journal":{"name":"Cell Surface","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100064"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8521170/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Surface","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468233021000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Infections resulting from Mycobacterium abscessus are increasing in prevalence worldwide, with the greatest risk posed to patients with underlying respiratory conditions. Treatment for infections is difficult due to wide ranging intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, which is compounded by the existence of a range of subspecies within the M. abscessus complex, each with varying additional antimicrobial resistance profiles. Previously, the use of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors within a combination therapy has been proposed as an effective treatment option for pulmonary M. abscessus infections. Here, we assess the in vitro efficacy of two non-β-lactam based inhibitors, relebactam and avibactam, as agents against M. abscessus with their respective partner drugs imipenem and ceftazidime, as well as in triplicate combinations with additional β-lactam antibiotics against the M. abscessus complex. We have shown that the commercially available ratio of imipenem to relebactam is the appropriate ratio for bactericidal activity against M. abscessus, whereas the ratio between ceftazidime and avibactam is redundant, due to inactivity of ceftazidime to inhibit the bacteria. We have identified that the use of imipenem and meropenem alongside either relebactam or avibactam yield low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) for each M. abscessus subspecies, which are within the therapeutically achievable concentration ranges within the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs. We propose the implementation of imipenem with relebactam in place of stand-alone imipenem into the current treatment regime, alongside meropenem, as a future front-line treatment option for M. abscessus complex infections.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞巴坦与阿维巴坦抗脓肿分枝杆菌复合体的体外疗效比较
脓肿分枝杆菌引起的感染在世界范围内的流行率正在上升,对有潜在呼吸系统疾病的患者构成的风险最大。由于广泛的内在抗菌素耐药性,感染的治疗是困难的,这是由脓肿分枝杆菌复合体内一系列亚种的存在加剧的,每个亚种都有不同的额外抗菌素耐药性概况。以前,在联合治疗中使用β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂已被提出作为肺脓肿分枝杆菌感染的有效治疗选择。在这里,我们评估了两种非β-内酰胺类抑制剂,乐巴坦和阿维巴坦,分别与它们各自的伴侣药物亚胺培南和头孢他啶一起作为治疗脓肿支原体的药物,以及与额外的β-内酰胺类抗生素联合治疗脓肿支原体复合体的体外疗效。我们已经证明,市售的亚胺培南与瑞巴坦的比例是对脓肿支原体杀菌活性的合适比例,而头孢他啶与阿维巴坦的比例是多余的,因为头孢他啶对细菌没有抑制活性。我们已经确定,亚胺培南和美罗培南与瑞乐巴坦或阿维巴坦一起使用对每个脓肿分枝杆菌亚种产生低最低抑制浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MBC),这些浓度在肺上皮内层液的治疗可达到的浓度范围内。我们建议在目前的治疗方案中使用亚胺培南和瑞巴坦,以取代单独的亚胺培南,并与美罗培南一起,作为脓肿分枝杆菌复杂感染的未来一线治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cell Surface
Cell Surface Immunology and Microbiology-Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive phenotypic analysis of multiple gene deletions of α-glucan synthase and Crh-transglycosylase gene families in Aspergillus niger highlighting the versatility of the fungal cell wall Sporothrix brasiliensis Gp70 is a cell wall protein required for adhesion, proper interaction with innate immune cells, and virulence Characterization of the Neurospora crassa GH72 family of Laminarin/Lichenin transferases and their roles in cell wall biogenesis Endocytic tethers modulate unconventional GAPDH secretion Mucilicious methods: Navigating the tools developed to Arabidopsis Seed Coat Mucilage analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1