Privatized Medicare Advantage for All: The Latest Assault on U.S. Health Care.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Health Services Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-27 DOI:10.1177/00207314211051887
John Geyman
{"title":"Privatized Medicare Advantage for All: The Latest Assault on U.S. Health Care.","authors":"John Geyman","doi":"10.1177/00207314211051887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Privatized Medicare Advantage has grown rapidly among seniors in the United States in recent years. It is now being promoted actively by corporate stakeholders and even by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services itself as a new proposal to extend this approach to cover all Americans. There is little public awareness, however, of the current costs and adverse impacts of Medicare Advantage on enrollees' access, costs, and outcomes of care while deceptive marketing and disinformation prevails. This article traces the history of Medicare Advantage, outlines false assertions being made by proponents of Medicare Advantage for All, and refutes them based on evidence and their track record. If ever enacted, it would end up lining the pockets of corporate stakeholders and Wall Street investors while limiting access to care, increasing costs, and reducing quality and outcomes of care. The United States already ranks last for access, equity, and outcomes of care in periodic studies by the Commonwealth Fund. This proposal would worsen that situation while costing patients, families, and taxpayers more as their health suffers.</p>","PeriodicalId":54959,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Services","volume":"52 1","pages":"141-145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207314211051887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Privatized Medicare Advantage has grown rapidly among seniors in the United States in recent years. It is now being promoted actively by corporate stakeholders and even by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services itself as a new proposal to extend this approach to cover all Americans. There is little public awareness, however, of the current costs and adverse impacts of Medicare Advantage on enrollees' access, costs, and outcomes of care while deceptive marketing and disinformation prevails. This article traces the history of Medicare Advantage, outlines false assertions being made by proponents of Medicare Advantage for All, and refutes them based on evidence and their track record. If ever enacted, it would end up lining the pockets of corporate stakeholders and Wall Street investors while limiting access to care, increasing costs, and reducing quality and outcomes of care. The United States already ranks last for access, equity, and outcomes of care in periodic studies by the Commonwealth Fund. This proposal would worsen that situation while costing patients, families, and taxpayers more as their health suffers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全民医保私有化优势:对美国医疗保健的最新攻击。
近年来,私有化的医疗保险优势在美国老年人中迅速发展。现在,企业利益相关者,甚至医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心本身,都在积极推动这一方案,将其作为一项新提案,将这一方法扩展到所有美国人。然而,在欺骗性营销和虚假信息盛行的情况下,公众很少意识到当前的成本和医疗保险优势对参保人的获取、成本和护理结果的不利影响。本文追溯了医疗保险优惠的历史,概述了全民医疗保险优惠的支持者所做的错误断言,并根据证据和他们的记录驳斥了他们。如果通过,它最终将使企业利益相关者和华尔街投资者中饱私囊,同时限制获得医疗服务的机会,增加成本,降低医疗质量和效果。在英联邦基金的定期研究中,美国在可及性、公平性和护理效果方面已经排在最后。这一提议将使情况恶化,同时使患者、家属和纳税人的健康受到更大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Health Services is a peer-reviewed journal that contains articles on health and social policy, political economy and sociology, history and philosophy, ethics and law in the areas of health and well-being. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
The Violence of Non-Violence: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Review on the Health Effects of Sanctions. Life and Health Under Israeli Military Occupation During COVID-19: Report from the West Bank, Occupied Palestinian Territory. Minority Rule: A Lethal Threat to the People's Health, Democracy, and our Planet. Private Equity Looting of U.S. Health Care: An Under-Recognized and Uncontrolled Scourge. An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Household Demographics on Diarrhea Morbidity in Children Aged 0 to 48 Months in Namibia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1